Thore Danielsen
Wolfgang Prinz
ABSTRACT
In this paper we discuss and elaborate on the conceptual requirements as well as the tools of the General AMIGO Model for group communication. The special features of the model are examined with particular reference to the social and ethical implications in the communication process. The applicability of the AMIGO Model is demonstrated by examples, and we give indications of further work to refine and advance the model.
- AMIGO DOCUMENT by Palme, J; Amigo: Document Storage and Retrieval, 25-11-1985 (Internal Document).Google Scholar
- AMIGO DOCUMENT Group Communication in MHS, 27-7-85 (Internal Document).Google Scholar
- AMIGO DOCUMENT by Pazos, Santo and Prinz Group Distribution Agents as Distribution List in an X.400 MHS, Working Document, 27-1-86, obtainable from GMD.Google Scholar
- Aiello, L., Nardi, D., Panti, M.; Modelling the office structure: A First Step Towards the Office Expert System, in: Second ACM SIGOA Conference Office Information Systems, ACM SIGOA, Vol.5, No. 1--2, 1984, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Allaire, Y., Firsirotu, M.E.; Theories of Organisational Culture, in: Organization Studies, No.5, 1984.Google Scholar
- Babatz, R., Pankoke-Babatz, U., Santo, H., Theidig, G.; Experimental Use of KOMEX in the GMD, Computer Compacts, April 1983, pp.83.Google Scholar
- Brotz, D.K.; Message System Mores: Etiquette in Laurel, in: ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, Vol.1, No.2, 1983. Google ScholarDigital Library
- CCITT SG5/VII; Recommendations X.400 Message Handling Systems (and the 6 companion parts), ITU, Geneva, 1984.Google Scholar
- Denning, P.; Electronic Junk, Communications of the ACM, Vol.25, No.3, 1982. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fikes, R.E.; A Commitment-Based Framework for Describing Cooperative Work, in: Cognitive Science, 1982, pp. 331--347.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gardner, P.C.; A System for the Automated Office Environment, IBM Systems Journal, No.3, 1981.Google Scholar
- Helmreich, R., Wimmer, K.; Field Study, with a Computerbased Office System, in: Telecommunications Policy 6, June 1982.Google Scholar
- Hiltz, St.R., Turoff, M.; The Evolution of User Behaviour in a Computerized Conferencing System, CACM Nov.1981, pp.739. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Hiltz, St.R., Kerr, E.B.; Computer-Mediated Communication Systems - Status and Evaluation, Academic Press, New York London, 1982. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Holt, A.W., Cashman, P.M.; Designing Systems to Support Cooperative Activity, An Example from Software Maintenance Management, IEEE COMPSAC, 1981.Google Scholar
- Horing, K., Spengler-Rast, C., Stellmacher, P.; Untersuchung des Computerkonferenzsystems KOMEX in der GMD Arbeitspapiere, Nr. 110, 1984.Google Scholar
- ISO/TC97/SC 18/WG 4 N277 Output document from ISO on Group Communication, 29-5-85.Google Scholar
- ISO/TC97/SC 18/WG 4 N355 Distributed Office Services (Applications), January, 1986.Google Scholar
- Kreifelts, T.; Coordination Procedures: A Model for Cooperative Office Process, Kommunication in Verteilten Systemem-Anwendungen und Betrieb, GI/NTG Fachtagung, Berlin, January, 1983, Informatik Fachberichte, Bd.60, Springer, Berlin, 1983). Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ohlson, M.; The Impact of Office Automation on the Organisation: Some Implications for Research and Practice, CACM, Nov.1982, pp.838. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Palme, J.; Experience with the Use of the COM Computerized, Conferencing System, (FOA Rapport (10166E-M6(h)), Dec.1981).Google Scholar
- Palme, J.; Survey of Computer-based Message Systems, Paper presented at Interact'84, the first IFIP Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, September 1984.Google Scholar
- Panko, R., Sprague, R.H.; Towards a New Framework for Office Support, ACM, 1982.Google Scholar
- Pankoke-Babatz, U.; Experiences with the KOMEX System as an Inhouse CBMS System KOMEX, in: Hugh T. Smith (ed) Computer-Based Message Services, Elsevier, North Holland, 1984. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rihaczek, K.; Datenschutz und Kommunikationssysteme, Reihe DuD-Fachbeitrage 1, Vieweg Braunschweig 1981.Google Scholar
- Turoff, M., Hiltz, R.S.; Working at Home or Living in the Office, in: IFIP 1983, Elsevier, North Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
- Watzlawik, P., Beavin, J.H., Jackson, Don D.; Pragmatics of Human Communication, W.W Norton & Company Inc., New York, Elsevier, 1967.Google Scholar
- Wosnitza, L.; Group Communication in the MHS Context, Paper presented at the IFIP 2nd International Symposium on Computer Message Systems, Washington, D.C., September, 1985.Google Scholar
Recommendations
Communication characteristics of instant messaging: effects and predictions of interpersonal relationships
CSCW '06: Proceedings of the 2006 20th anniversary conference on Computer supported cooperative workInstant Messaging is a popular medium for both social and work-related communication. In this paper we report an investigation of the effect of interpersonal relationship on underlying basic communication characteristics (such as messaging rate and ...
Comments