skip to main content
10.1145/642611.642682acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

How do people manage their digital photographs?

Published:05 April 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we present and discuss the findings of a study that investigated how people manage their collections of digital photographs. The six-month, 13-participant study included interviews, questionnaires, and analysis of usage statistics gathered from an instrumented digital photograph management tool called Shoebox. Alongside simple browsing features such as folders, thumbnails and timelines, Shoebox has some advanced multimedia features: content-based image retrieval and speech recognition applied to voice annotations. Our results suggest that participants found their digital photos much easier to manage than their non-digital ones, but that this advantage was almost entirely due to the simple browsing features. The advanced features were not used very often and their perceived utility was low. These results should help to inform the design of improved tools for managing personal digital photographs.

References

  1. Balabanovic, M., Chu, L.L., and Wolff, G.J. Storytelling with digital photographs. In Proceedings of CHI 2000, 564--571. ACM, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bederson, B.B. PhotoMesa: A zoomable image browser using quantum treemaps and bubblemaps. In Proceedings of UIST 2001, 71--80. ACM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brown, M.G., Foote, J.T., Jones, G.J.F., Spärck Jones, K., and Young, S.J. Open-vocabulary speech indexing for voice and video mail retrieval. In Proceedings of ACM Multimedia '96, 307--316. ACM, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Graham, A., Garcia-Molina, H., Paepcke, A., and Winograd, T. Time as essence for photo browsing through personal digital libraries. In Proceedings of JCDL 2002, 326--335. ACM, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Holland, P. 'Sweet it is to scan..': Personal photographs and popular photography. In L. Wells, editor, Photography: A Critical Introduction, chapter 3, 103--150. Routledge, London, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Kuchinsky, A., Pering, C., Creech, M.L., Freeze, D., Serra, B., and Gwizdka, J. FotoFile: A consumer multimedia organization and retrieval system. In Proceedings of CHI'99, 496--503. ACM, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Lansdale, M., and Edmonds, E. Using memory for events in the design of personal filing systems. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 36(1):97--126, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mäkelä, A., Giller, V., Tscheligi, M., and Sefelin, R. Joking, storytelling, artsharing, expressing affection: A field trial of how children and their social network communicate with digital images in leisure time. In Proceedings of CHI 2000, 548--555. ACM, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Markkula, M., and Sormunen, E. End-user searching challenges indexing practices in the digital newspaper photo archive. Information Retrieval, 1(4):259--285, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Mills, T.J., Pye, D., Hollinghurst, N.J., and Wood, K.R. AT&TV: broadcast television and radio retrieval. In Proceedings of RIAO 2000, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Mills, T.J., Pye, D., Sinclair, D., and Wood, K.R. Shoebox: A digital photo management system. Technical Report 2000.10, AT&T Laboratories Cambridge, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Platt, J.C. AutoAlbum: Clustering digital photographs using probabilistic model merging. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Content-Based Access of Image and Video Libraries, 96--100. IEEE, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Platt, J.C., Czerwinski, M., and Field, B.A. PhotoTOC: Automatic clustering for browsing personal photographs. Technical Report MSR-TR-2002-17, Microsoft Research, 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Rodden, K. How do people organise their photographs? In Proceedings of the BCS IRSG Colloquium, Electronic Workshops in Computing, http://www.ewic.org.uk, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Rodden, K. Evaluating Similarity-Based Visualisations as Interfaces for Image Browsing. PhD thesis, Technical Report 543, University of Cambridge Computer Laboratory, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Rodden, K., Basalaj, W., Sinclair, D., and Wood, K. Does organisation by similarity assist image browsing? In Proceedings of CHI 2001, 190--197. ACM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Shneiderman, B., and Kang. H. Direct annotation: A drag-and-drop strategy for labeling photos. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Information Visualisation, 88--95. IEEE, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Whittaker, S., and Sidner, C. Email overload: exploring personal information management of email. In Proceedings of CHI'96, 276--283. ACM, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. How do people manage their digital photographs?

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '03: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2003
          620 pages
          ISBN:1581136307
          DOI:10.1145/642611

          Copyright © 2003 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 5 April 2003

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '03 Paper Acceptance Rate75of468submissions,16%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader