Dan Cosley
Shyong K. Lam
Joseph A. Konstan
John Riedl
ABSTRACT
Recommender systems use people's opinions about items in an information domain to help people choose other items. These systems have succeeded in domains as diverse as movies, news articles, Web pages, and wines. The psychological literature on conformity suggests that in the course of helping people make choices, these systems probably affect users' opinions of the items. If opinions are influenced by recommendations, they might be less valuable for making recommendations for other users. Further, manipulators who seek to make the system generate artificially high or low recommendations might benefit if their efforts influence users to change the opinions they contribute to the recommender. We study two aspects of recommender system interfaces that may affect users' opinions: the rating scale and the display of predictions at the time users rate items. We find that users rate fairly consistently across rating scales. Users can be manipulated, though, tending to rate toward the prediction the system shows, whether the prediction is accurate or not. However, users can detect systems that manipulate predictions. We discuss how designers of recommender systems might react to these findings.
- T. Amoo and H. H. Friedman. Do numeric values influence subjects' responses to rating scales? Journal of International Marketing and Marketing Research, 26:41--46, February 2001.Google Scholar
- S. E. Asch. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgements. In Groups, Leadership, and Men, pages 177--190, 1951.Google Scholar
- J. S. Breese, D. Heckerman, and C. Kadie. Empirical analysis of predictive algorithms for collaborative filtering. In Proc. UAI '98, pages 43--52, July 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Dellarocas. Immunizing online reputation reporting systems against unfair ratings and discriminatory behavior. In Proc. 2nd ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 150--157, Minneapolis, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Domingos and M. Richardson. Mining the network value of customers. In Proc. SIGKDD 2001., pages 57--66, San Francisco, 2001. ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- H. H. Friedman and T. Amoo. Rating the rating scales. Journal of Marketing Management, 9(3):114--123, 1999.Google Scholar
- R. Garland. The midpoint on a rating scale: Is it desirable? Marketing Bulletin, 2:66--70, 1991.Google Scholar
- K. Goldberg, T. Roeder, D. Gupta, and C. Perkins. Eigentaste: A constant time collaborative filtering algorithm. Information Retrieval, 4(2):133--151, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. L. Herlocker, J. A. Konstan, and J. Riedl. Explaining collaborative filtering recommendations. In Proc. CSCW2000, pages 241--250, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- W. Hill, L. Stead, M. Rosenstein, and G. Furnas. Recommending and evaluating choices in a virtual community of use. In Proc. CHI95, pages 194--201, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Nass and Y. Moon. Machines and mindlessness: Social responses to computers. Journal of Social Issues, 60(1):81--103, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- D. M. Pennock, E. Horvitz, S. Lawrence, and C. L. Giles. Collaborative filtering by personality diagnosis: A hybrid memory and modelbased approach. In Proc. UAI'00, pages 473--480, San Francisco, July 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Resnick, N. Iacovou, M. Suchak, P. Bergstrom, and J. Riedl. GroupLens: An open architecture for collaborative filtering of netnews. In Proc. CSCW94, pages 175--186, 1994. Google ScholarDigital Library
- B. M. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. A. Konstan, and J. Reidl. Item based collaborative filtering recommendation algorithms. In WWW10, pages 285--295, 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
- U. Shardanand and P. Maes. Social information filtering: Algorithms for automating "word of mouth". In Proc. CHI95, pages 210--217, 1995. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Swearingen and R. Sinha. Interaction design for recommender systems. In Designing Interactive Systems (DIS2002), London, June 25--28 2002.Google Scholar
- A. H. Turpin and W. Hersh. Why batch and user evaluations do not give the same results. In Proc. SIGIR2001, pages 225--231, New Orleans, Sept. 9--13 2001. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Is seeing believing?: how recommender system interfaces affect users' opinions
Recommendations
A Scalable, Accurate Hybrid Recommender System
WKDD '10: Proceedings of the 2010 Third International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data MiningRecommender systems apply machine learning techniques for filtering unseen information and can predict whether a user would like a given resource. There are three main types of recommender systems: collaborative filtering, content-based filtering, and ...
A framework for diversifying recommendation lists by user interest expansion
Recommender systems have been widely used to discover users' preferences and recommend interesting items to users during this age of information overload. Researchers in the field of recommender systems have realized that the quality of a top-N ...
Recommender systems for product bundling
Recommender systems (RS) are a class of information filter applications whose main goal is to provide personalized recommendations, content, and services to users. Recommendation services may support a firm's marketing strategy and contribute to ...
Comments