skip to main content
article
Free Access

I/S attitudes: toward theoretical and definitional clarity

Published:01 October 1988Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

There has long been a recognized need to measure the "success" or efficacy of information systems and the implementation process. Various constructs related to success have been suggested such as user attitudes, use, performance, and value. The attitude construct has received a great deal of attention for both theoretical and operational reasons. This paper focuses on the need for a convincing theoretical model linking systems or policies and user attitudes on the one hand, and user attitude and performance or value on the other. Using job satisfaction research as a reference discipline for understanding the relationship between attitudes and performance, a model of I/S attitudes, beliefs, and performance is developed. This model suggests that performance is affected by the correspondence or "fit" between the task requirements and the functionality of the I/S environment. In addition a distinction between beliefs and attitudes is recommended. While satisfaction might be best determined by measuring attitudes, the correspondence between task and functionality is best determined by measuring beliefs. The implications of this model for future research are discussed.

References

  1. Bailey, J.E. and Pearson, S.W., 1983, "Development of a Tool Measuring and Analyzing Computer User Satisfaction," Management Science, Vol. 29, No. 5, May, pp. 530-544.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Baroudi, J.J., Olson, M.H., and Ives, B., 1986, "An Empirical Study of the Impact of User Involvement on System Usage and Information Satisfaction," Communications Of The ACM, Vol. 29, No. 3, March. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Brayfield, A.H. and Crockett, W.H., 1955, "Employee Attitudes and Employee Performance," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 52, No. 5, pp. 396-424.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bruwer, P.J.S., 1984, "A Descriptive Model of Success For Computer-Based Information Systems," Information & Management, Vol. 7, pp. 63-67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Cheny, P.H. and Dickson, G.W., 1982, "Organizational Characteristics and Information Systems: An Exploratory Investigation," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 170-184.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Dawis, R.V., Lofquist, L.H., and Weiss, D.J., 1968, A Theory Of Work Adjustment, (A Revision), Minnesota Studies In Vocational Rehabilitation: XXIII, Industrial Relations Center, Bulletin 47, University Of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ein-Dor, P., Segev, E., Blumenthal, D., and Millet, I., 1984, "Perceived Importance, Investment, and Success of MIS, Or the MIS Zoo--An Empirical Investigation and a Taxonomy," Systems, Objectives, Solutions, Vol. 4, pp. 61-67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Epstein, B.J. and King, W.R., 1982, "An Experimental Study of the Value of Information," Omega, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 249-258.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior, Addison-Wesley, Reading, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Gallagher, C.A., 1974, "Perceptions of the Value of a Management Information System," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 17, No. 1, March, pp. 46- 55.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Gibson, D.L., Weiss, D.J., Dawis, R.V. and Lofquist, L.H., 1970, Manual For the Minnesota Satisfactoriness Scales, Minnesota Studies In Vocational Rehabilitation: XXVII, Industrial Relations Center, Bulletin 53, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Ginzberg, M.J., 1981, "Early Diagnosis of MIS Implementation Failure: Promising Results and Unanswered Questions," Management Science, Vol. 27, No. 4, April, pp. 459-478.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Peterson, R.O., and Capwell, D.F., 1957, Job Attitudes: Review of Research and Opinion, Psychological Service Of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Higgins, J.C. and Finn, R., 1977, "The Chief Executive and His Information System," Omega, Vol. 5, No. 7, pp. 557-566.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Iaffaldano, M.T. and Muchinsky, P.M. "Job Satisfaction and Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 97, No. 2, pp. 251-273.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ives, B., Olson, M.H., and Baroudi, J.J., 1983, "The Measurement of User Information Satisfaction," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 26, No. 10, October, pp. 785-793. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Jenkins, M. and Ricketts, J., 1985, "The Development of an MIS Satisfaction Questionnaire: An Instrument For Evaluating User Satisfaction With Turnkey Decision Support Systems," Discussion Paper No. 296, Division of Research, School of Business, Indiana University, August.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. King, W.R. and Epstein, B.J., 1983, "Assessing Information System Value: An Experimental Study," Decision Sciences, Vol. 14, pp. 34-45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Larcker, D.F. and Lessig, V.P., 1980, "Perceived Usefulness of Information: A Psychometric Examination," Decision Sciences, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 121-134.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Lawler E.E. and Porter, L.W., 1967, "The Effect of Performance on Job Satisfaction," Industrial Relations, Vol. 7, October. pp. 20-28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Lucas, H.C., 1975, "Performance and the Use of an Information System", Management Science, Vol. 21, No. 8, April, pp. 908-919.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Mahmood, M.A. and Becker, J.D., 1986, "Effect of Organizational Maturity on End-Users' Satisfaction With Information Systems," Journal Of Management Information Systems, Vol. 2, No. 3.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. March, J.G. and Simon, H.A., 1963, Organizations, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. McKeen, J.D., 1983, "Successful Development Strategies For Business Application Systems," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 7, No. 3, September, pp. 47-65.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Nolan, R.L., 1977, "Effects of Chargeout on User/Manager Attitudes," Communications of the ACM, Vol. 20, No. 3, March, pp. 177-185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Olson, M., 1981, "User Involvement and Decentralization of the Development Function: A Comparison of Two Case Studies," Systems, Objective, Solutions, Vol. 1, pp. 59-69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Olson, M.H. and Ives, B., 1982, "Chargeback Systems and User Involvement in Information Systems--An Empirical Investigation," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 6, No. 2, June, pp. 47-60.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. O'Reilly, C.A., III, 1982, "Variations in Decision Makers' Use of Information Sources: The Impact of Quality and Accessibility of Information," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 25, No. 4., pp. 756-771.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Petty, R.E. and Cacioppo, J.T., 1981, Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches, Wm. C. Brown, Dubuque, Iowa.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Raymond, L., 1986, "The Measurement of MIS User Satisfaction in a Small Systems Context," Proceedings of the 19th Annual Hawaii International Conference On System Sciences, Honolulu, Hawaii, January.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Robey, D., 1979, "User Attitudes and Management Information System Use," Academy Of Management Journal, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 527-538.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Sanders, G.L. and Courtney, J.F., 1985, "A Field Study of Organizational Factors Influencing DSS Success," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 1, March 1985, pp. 77-93.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Schewe, C.D., 1976, "The Management Information System User: An Exploratory Behavioral Analysis," Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 19, No. 4, December, pp. 577-590.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Schwab, D.P. and Cummings, L.L., 1973, "Theories of Performance and Satisfaction: AReview," in Readings In Organizational Behavior And Human Performance, Scott, W.E. and Cummings, L.L. (eds.) Richard D. Irwin, Inc., pp. 130-141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Schultz, R,L, and Slevin, D.P., 1975, "Implementation and Organizational Validity: An Empirical Investigation," in Implementing Operations Research/Management Science, Schultz and Slevin, (eds.), pp. 153-182, American Elsevier Company, New York, NY.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Srinivasan, A., 1985, "Alternative Measures of Systems Effectiveness: Associations and Implications," MIS Quarterly, Vol. 9, No. 3, September, pp. 243-253.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Swanson, E.B., 1974, "Management Information Systems: Appreciation and Involvement," Management Science, Vol. 21, No. 2, October, pp. 178-188.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Swanson, E.B., 1982a, "Measuring User Attitudes in MIS Research: A Review," Omega, Vol. 10, No. 2.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Swanson, E.B., 1982b, "Toward a Measure of Information Channel Disposition," Information Systems Working Paper #6-83, Computers and Information Systems Research Program, Graduate School Of Management, UCLA, December.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Swanson, E.B., 1982c, "Information Channel Disposition and Use," Information Systems Working Paper #7-83, Computers And Information Systems Research Program, Graduate School Of Management, UCLA, December.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Treacy, M.E., 1985, "An Empirical Examination of a Causal Model of User Information Satisfaction," Unpublished Paper, Center For Information Systems Research, Sloan School of Management, MIT, April.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Triandis, H.C., 1959, "A Critique and Experimental Design for the Study of the Relationship Between Productivity and Job Satisfaction," Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 56. No. 4, pp. 309-312.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Vroom, V.H., 1964, Work And Motivation, John Wiley & Sons, New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Weiss, D.J., Dawis, R.V., England, G.W. and Lofquist, L.H., 1967, Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire, Minnesota Studies In Vocational Rehabilitation: XXII, Industrial Relations Center, Bulletin 45, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. Zmud, R.W., 1978, "An Empirical Investigation of the Dimensionality of the Concept of Information," Decision Sciences, Vol. 9, pp. 187-195.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. I/S attitudes: toward theoretical and definitional clarity

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems
        ACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems  Volume 19, Issue 3-4
        Fall/Winter 1988
        58 pages
        ISSN:0095-0033
        EISSN:1532-0936
        DOI:10.1145/65766
        Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 1988 Author

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 1 October 1988

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • article

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader