skip to main content
10.1145/73393.73399acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessocgConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

The complexity of many faces in arrangements of lines of segments

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 January 1988Publication History

ABSTRACT

We show that the total number of edges of m faces of an arrangement of n lines in the plane is Ο(m2/3-δ n2/3+2δ + n), for any δ > 0. The proof takes an algorithmic approach, that is, we describe an algorithm for the calculation of these m faces and derive the upper bound from the analysis of the algorithm. The algorithm uses randomization and, with high probability, its time complexity is within a log2n factor of the above bound. If instead of lines we have an arrangement of n line segments, then the maximum number of edges of m faces is Ogr;(m2/3-δn2/3+2δ + nα(n)logm), for any δ > 0, where α(n) is the functional inverse of Ackermann's function. We give a (randomized) algorithm that produces these faces and, with high probability, takes time that is within a log2n factor of the combinatorial bound.

References

  1. Ca.Canham, R. J. A theorem on arrangements of lines in the plane, israel j. Math. 7 (1969), 393-397.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. CD.Chazelle, B. and Dobkin, D. P. Intersection of convex objects in two and three dimensions. J. Assoc. Comput. Math. 34 (1987), 1-27. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Cl.Clarkson, K. New applications of random sampling in computational geometry. Discrete Comput. Geom. 2 (1987), 195- 222.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. CEGSW.Clarkson, K., Edelsbrunner, H., Guibas, L. J., Sharir, M. and Welzl, E. Complexity bounds for arrangements. In preparation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. CSY.Cole, R., Sharir M. and Yap, C. K. On k-hulls and related problems. SIAM J. Comput. 16 (1987), 61-77. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Ed.Edelsbrunner, H. Algorithms in Combinatorial Geometry. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. EGSh.Edelsbrunner, H., Guibas, L. J. and Sharir, M. The complexity of many cells in arrangements of planes and related problems. In preparation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. ES.Edelsbrunner, H. and Sharir, M. The maximum number of ways to stab n convex non-intersecting objects in the plane is 2n -2. To appear in Discrete Comput. Geom.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. EW.Edelsbrunner, H. and Welzl, E. On the maximal number of edges of many faces in an arrangement. J. Combin. Theory, 5er. A 41 (1986), 159-166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. EW2.Edelsbrunner, H. and Welzl, E. Halfplanar range search in linear space and O(n~'695) query time. Inform. Process, Letl. 23 (1986), 289-293. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Gr.Grfinbaum, B. Convex Polytopes. John Wiley & Sons, Lon. don, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. GOS.Guibas, L. J., Overmars, M.H. and Sharir, M. Intersections, connectivity, and related problems for arrangements of line segments. In preparation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. GSS.Guibas, L. J., Sharir, M. and Sifrony, S. On general motion planning problems with two degrees of freedom. In "Proc. 4'h ACM Syrup. Comput. Geom. 1988". Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. HS.Hart, S. and Sharir, M. Nonlinearity of Davenport Schinzel sequences and of generalized path compression schemes. Combinatorica 6 (1986), 151-177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. HW.Haussler, D. and Welzl, E. Epsilon-nets and simplex range queries. Discrete Comput. Geom. 2 (1987), 127-151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. OR.O'Rourke, J. The signature of a plane curve. SIAM J. Comput. 15 (1986), 34-51. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. PSS.Pollack, R., Sharir, M. and Sifrony, S. Separating two simple polygons by a sequence of translations. Discrete Corn- . put. Geom. 3 (1988), 123-136.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. PS.Preparata, F. P. and Shamos, M. I. Computational Geometry - an Introduction. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1985. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. SML.Schmitt, A., Muller, H. and Leister, W. Ray tracing algorithms - theory and practice. In Theoretical Foundations of Computer Graphics and CAD (R.A. Earnshaw, Ed.), NATO ASI Series, Vol. F40, Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1988, 997-1030.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. ST.Szemerbti, E. and Trotter, W. T. Extremal problems in discrete geometry. Combinatorica 3 (1983), 381-392.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. WS.Wiernik, A. and Sharir, M. Planar realization of nonlinear Davenport Schinzel sequences by segments. Discrete Comput. Geom. 3 (1988), 15-47. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. The complexity of many faces in arrangements of lines of segments

                              Recommendations

                              Comments

                              Login options

                              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

                              Sign in
                              • Published in

                                cover image ACM Conferences
                                SCG '88: Proceedings of the fourth annual symposium on Computational geometry
                                January 1988
                                403 pages
                                ISBN:0897912705
                                DOI:10.1145/73393

                                Copyright © 1988 ACM

                                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                                Publisher

                                Association for Computing Machinery

                                New York, NY, United States

                                Publication History

                                • Published: 6 January 1988

                                Permissions

                                Request permissions about this article.

                                Request Permissions

                                Check for updates

                                Qualifiers

                                • Article

                                Acceptance Rates

                                Overall Acceptance Rate625of1,685submissions,37%

                              PDF Format

                              View or Download as a PDF file.

                              PDF

                              eReader

                              View online with eReader.

                              eReader