Lloyd H. Nakatani
ABSTRACT
Machines and computer systems differ in many characteristics that have important consequences for the user. Machines are special-purpose, have forms suggestive of their functions, are operated with controls in obvious one-to-one correspondence with their actions, and the consequences of the actions on visible objects are immediately and readily apparent. By contrast, computer systems are general-purpose, have inscrutable form, are operated symbolically via a keyboard with no obvious correspondence between keys and actions, and typically operate on invisible objects with consequences that are not immediately or readily apparent. The characteristics possessed by machines, but typically absent in computer systems, aid learning, use and transfer among machines. But “hard,” physical machines have limitations: they are inflexible, and their complexity can overwhelm us. We have built in our laboratory “soft machine” interfaces for computer systems to capitalize on the good characteristics of machines and overcome their limitations. A soft machine is implemented using the synergistic combination of real-time computer graphics to display “soft controls,” and a touch screen to make soft controls operable like conventional hard controls.
- 1.A.F. Albert, "The Effect of Graphic Input Devices on Performance in a Cursor Positioning Task," Proceedings of the Human Factors Society, 1982, pp. 54-58.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- 2.S. K. Card, W. K. English and B. J. Burr, "Evaluation of Mouse, Rate-Controlled Isometric Joystick, Step Keys, and Text Keys for Text Selection on a CRT," Ergonomics, 21, 1978, pp. 601-613.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 3.A. Chapanis, "Design of Controls," in H. P. Van Cott and R. G. Kinkade, Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design, McGraw-Hill, 1972, pp. 346-379.Google Scholar
- 4.J. L. Ehardt, "Apple's Lisa: A Personal Office System," The Seybold Report on Office Systems, 6, January 1983.Google Scholar
- 5.K. C. Knowlton, "Computer Displays Optically Superimposed on Input Devices," Bell System Technical Journal, 56, March 1977, pp. 367-383.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 6.B. J. Mirrer, "An Interactive, Graphical, Touch-Oriented Speech Editor," MIT Master's Thesis, 1982.Google Scholar
- 7.C. Schmandt, "The Intelligent Ear—A Graphical Interface to Digital Audio," Proceedings of the 1981 International Conference on Cybernetics and Society, 1981, pp. 393-397.Google Scholar
- 8.P. J. Schuyten, "Xerox Introduces 'Intelligent Copier,'" The New York Times, Thursday, September 25, 1980, p. D4.Google Scholar
- 9.D. C. Smith, C. Irby, R. Kimball and B. Verplank, "Designing the Star User Interface," Byte, April 1982, pp. 242-282.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Soft machines: A philosophy of user-computer interface design
Recommendations
Soft topological soft groups and soft rings
In this paper, we produce and examine several new notions such as soft topological soft groups and their subsystem. Also, soft topological soft rings and their subsystems are introduced. Furthermore, we introduce some new concepts like softly ...
Training soft margin support vector machines by simulated annealing
It was proposed a method to solve the dual quadratic optimization problem of SVMs.The proposal named SATE is based on simulated annealing.The objective function and constraints for SVM were successfully embedded in SATE.Our proposal is very simple to ...
Soft ωs-irresoluteness and soft pre-ωs-openness insoft topological spaces
We use soft ωs-open sets to define soft ωs-irresoluteness, soft ωs-openness, and soft pre-ωs-openness as three new classes of soft mappings. We give several characterizations for each of them, specially via soft ωs-closure and soft ωs-interior soft ...
Comments