ABSTRACT
Research into providing different levels of network Quality of Service (QoS) often assumes that there is a large market for QoS-sensitive applications that will be fulfilled once QoS-enabled networks have been deployed. Multiplayer networked games are an example of such an application that requires QoS, and hence will only become popular if QoS is made widely available. The prima facie evidence, however, is that games are already popular, in spite of the existing QoS-free best-effort Internet.Networked games may have become popular despite the lack of QoS because players "make do" with what is available to them. Such popularity is a double-edged sword. It may mean that there is a demand, as yet unfulfilled, from game players for QoS-enabled networks. On the other hand, it may mean that players have become accustomed to playing games without QoS, and therefore might be less willing to pay for higher QoS when it does eventually become available.In this paper we present the results of a short experiment to examine the QoS tolerances of game players. We use a set of popular First Person Shooter (FPS) game servers that are publicly available to Internet users at large. By systematically altering the network latency to the servers, we attempt to study whether degraded QoS (in the form of higher network delay) affects a user's decision to participate in the game.We find that increased network delay has an effect on a user's decision to join a game server. It appears, however, that there is no significant difference in the number of players who leave the game as a result of increased delay. We speculate that this may be due to a user's enjoyment exceeding their QoS-sensitivity, and discuss the implications of our findings with respect to providing and charging for QoS.
- G. Armitage. Sensitivity of Quake3 players to network latency. Poster, ACM SIGCOMM Internet Measurement Workshop 2001, Berkeley, CA, USA, Nov. 2001.]]Google Scholar
- R. W. Bailey. Human Performance Engineering --- Using Human Factors/Ergonomics to Achieve Computer System Usability. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA, second edition, 1989.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. W. Bernier. Latency compensating methods in client/server in-game protocol design and optimization. In Proceedings of the 15th Games Developers Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, Mar. 2001.]]Google Scholar
- S. Blake, D. L. Black, M. Carlson, E. Davies, Z. Wang, and W. Weiss. An architecture for differentiated services, Dec. 1998. RFC 2475.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Braden, D. Clark, and S. Shenker. Integrated Services in the Internet architecture: an overview, June 1994. RFC 1633.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Cheshire. Latency and the quest for interactivity, Nov. 1996. White paper commissioned by Volpe Welty Asset Management, L.L.C., for the Synchronous Person-to-Person Interactive Computing Environments Meeting.]]Google Scholar
- M. F. Daneshmand, R. R. Roy, and C. G. Savolaine. Framework and requirements of quality of service for multimedia applications. In Proceedings of the 1997 IASTED International Conference on Intelligent Information Systems (IIS '97), pages 466--474, Grand Bahama Island, Bahamas, Dec. 1997.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Inside Sony Online Entertainment. Edge, 102:56--61, Oct. 2001.]]Google Scholar
- P. C. Fishburn and A. M. Odlyzko. Competitive pricing of information goods: Subscription pricing versus pay-per-use. Economic Theory, 13(2):447--470, Mar. 1999.]]Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Heinanen, F. Baker, W. Weiss, and J. Wroclawski. Assured forwarding PHB group, June 1999. RFC 2597.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Henderson. Latency and user behaviour on a multiplayer game server. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Networked Group Communication (NGC), pages 1--13, London, UK, Nov. 2001.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- T. Henderson. Observations on game server discovery mechanisms. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Network and System Support for Games (NetGames), pages 47--52, Braunschweig, Germany, Apr. 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. 1278.2-1995, IEEE Standard for Distributed Interactive Simulation --- Communication Services and Profiles. IEEE, New York, NY, USA, Apr. 1996.]]Google Scholar
- International Telecommunication Union. ITU-T Recommendation G.114: International telephone connections and circuits --- General Recommendations on the transmission quality for an entire international telephone connection --- One-way transmission time. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland, May 2000.]]Google Scholar
- V. Jacobson, K. Nichols, and K. Poduri. An expedited forwarding PHB, June 1999. RFC 2598.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Y. A. Korilis, A. A. Lazar, and A. Orda. Architecting noncooperative networks. IEEE Journal of Selected Areas In Communications, 13(7):1241--1251, Sept. 1995.]]Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Larkin. Winning the monster game. Far Eastern Economic Review, page 32, Sept. 05, 2002.]]Google Scholar
- I. S. MacKenzie and C. Ware. Lag as a determinant of human performance in interactive systems. In Proceedings of the CHI '93 Conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 488--493, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, Apr. 1993.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Mathy, C. Edwards, and D. Hutchison. Principles of QoS in group communications. Telecommunication Systems, 11(1--2):59--84, 1999.]]Google Scholar
- S. McCreary and K. Claffy. Trends in wide area IP traffic patterns: A view from Ames Internet Exchange. In Proceedings of the ITC Specialist Seminar on IP Traffic Modeling, Measurement and Management, Monterey, CA, USA, Sept. 2000.]]Google Scholar
- E. Medina. Yahoo enters game rental arena. Boston Globe, page C3, Sept. 23, 2002.]]Google Scholar
- netfilter/iptables project. http://netfilter.samba.org.]]Google Scholar
- A. M. Odlyzko. Internet pricing and the history of communications. Computer Networks, 36(5--6):493--517, Aug. 2001.]]Google Scholar
- M. Oliveira and T. Henderson. What online gamers really think of the Internet. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Network and System Support for Games (NetGames), pages 177--185, Redwood City, CA, USA, May 2003.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- L. Pantel and L. C. Wolf. On the impact of delay on real-time multiplayer games. In Proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video (NOSSDAV), pages 23--29, Miami Beach, FL, USA, May 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. Park, M. Sitharam, and S. Chen. Quality of service provision in noncooperative networks: heterogenous preferences, multi-dimensional QoS vectors, and burstiness. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Information and Computation Economies (ICE-98), pages 111--127, Charleston, SC, USA, Oct. 1998.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. S. Park and R. V. Kenyon. Effects of network characteristics on human performance in a collaborative virtual environment. In Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality Conference (VR '99), pages 104--111, Houston, TX, USA, Mar. 1999.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Patrizio. Coming soon: Pay-per-game. Wired News, Oct. 20, 2000. http://www.wired.com/news/culture/0,1284,39505,00.html.]]Google Scholar
- M. Ranta-aho, A. Leppinen, G. Poulain, A. Roella, M. Mirabelli, A. Ousland, and J. Norgaard. Task-dependent user requirements for Quality of service of Videoconferencing-CSCW services. In Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Human Factors in Telecommunications, pages 251--254, Oslo, Norway, May 1997.]]Google Scholar
- D. P. Reed. Going nowhere fast. Context Magazine, July/Aug. 1999.]]Google Scholar
- C. Schaefer, T. Enderes, H. Ritter, and M. Zitterbart. Subjective quality assessment for multiplayer real-time games. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Network and System Support for Games (NetGames), pages 74--78, Braunschweig, Germany, Apr. 2002.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- N. Sheldon, E. Girard, S. Borg, M. Claypool, and E. Agu. The effect of latency on user performance in Warcraft III. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Network and System Support for Games (NetGames), pages 3--14, Redwood City, CA, USA, May 2003.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Slashdot.org. How fast too slow? A study of Quake pings, May 24, 2001. http://slashdot.org/articles/01/05/24/2044233.shtml.]]Google Scholar
- M. Terrano and P. Bettner. 1500 archers on a 28.8: Network programming in Age of Empires and beyond. In Proceedings of the 15th Games Developers Conference, San Jose, CA, USA, Mar. 2001.]]Google Scholar
- I. Vaghi, C. Greenhalgh, and S. Benford. Coping with inconsistency due to network delays in collaborative virtual environments. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, pages 42--49, London, UK, Dec. 1999.]] Google ScholarDigital Library
- Networked games: a QoS-sensitive application for QoS-insensitive users?
Recommendations
Exertion in networked games
FDG '09: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital GamesPhysical play familiar from sports activities is a favorite pastime across all cultures and has been attributed with many social, mental and physical health benefits. However, the players have to be in the same physical location together in order to ...
Casual games discussion
Future Play '07: Proceedings of the 2007 conference on Future PlayDigital games have become a remarkable cultural phenomenon in the last ten years. The casual games sector especially has been growing rapidly in the last few years. However, there is no clear view on what is "casual" in games cultures and the area has ...
Cheating in networked computer games: a review
DIMEA '07: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Digital interactive media in entertainment and artsThe increasing popularity of Massively Multiplayer Online Games (MMOG) -- games involving thousands of players participating simultaneously in a single virtual world - has highlighted the scalability bottlenecks present in centralised Client/Server (C/S)...
Comments