skip to main content
10.1145/956750.956783acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Screening and interpreting multi-item associations based on log-linear modeling

Published:24 August 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

Association rules have received a lot of attention in the data mining community since their introduction. The classical approach to find rules whose items enjoy high support (appear in a lot of the transactions in the data set) is, however, filled with shortcomings. It has been shown that support can be misleading as an indicator of how interesting the rule is. Alternative measures, such as lift, have been proposed. More recently, a paper by DuMouchel et al. proposed the use of all-two-factor loglinear models to discover sets of items that cannot be explained by pairwise associations between the items involved. This approach, however, has its limitations, since it stops short of considering higher order interactions (other than pairwise) among the items. In this paper, we propose a method that examines the parameters of the fitted loglinear models to find all the significant association patterns among the items. Since fitting loglinear models for large data sets can be computationally prohibitive, we apply graph-theoretical results to divide the original set of items into components (sets of items) that are statistically independent from each other. We then apply loglinear modeling to each of the components and find the interesting associations among items in them. The technique is experimentally evaluated with a real data set (insurance data) and a series of synthetic data sets. The results show that the technique is effective in finding interesting associations among the items involved.

References

  1. R. Agrawal, T. Imilienski, and A. Swami. Mining association rules between sets of items in large databases. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Database, pages 207--216, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Agrawal and R. Srikant. Fast algorithms for mining association rules. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pages 487--499, September 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. A. Agresti. Categorical data anlysis. Wiley, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. J. Badsberg. An environment for graphical models. Ph.D. Thesis, Aalborg University, Demark, 1995.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Barbará, W. DuMouchel, C. Faloutsos, P. Hass, J. M. Hellerstein, Y. Ioannidis, H. Jagadish, T. Johnson, R. Ng, V. Poosala, K. Ross, and K. Sevcik. The new jersey data reduction report. Bulletin of the Technical Committee on Data Engineering, 20(4):3--45, December 1997.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. D. Barbará and X. Wu. Loglinear based quasi cubes. Journal of Information and Intelligent Systems, 16(3):255--276, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. J. Benedetti and M. Brown. Stratigies for the selection of loglinear models. Biometrics, 34:680--686, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Y. M. Bishop, S. E. Fienberg, and P. W. Holland. Discrete Multivariate Analysis: Theory and Practice. The MIT Press, Cambride, Massachusetts, and London, England, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. M. Brown. Screening effects in multidimensional contigency tables. Applied Statistics, 25:37--46, 1976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. COIL challenge 2000. The insurance company (tic) benchmark. http://kdd.uci.edu/databases/tic/tic.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. A. Deshpande, M. Garofalakis, and R. Rastogi. Independence is good: Dependency-based histogram synopses for high-dimensional data. In Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, pages 199--210. Santa Barbara, California, May 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. W. DuMouchel and D. Pregibon. Empirical bayes screening for multi-item association. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data. San Francisco, CA, August 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. L. Goodman. The analysis of multidimensional contigency tables: Stepwise procedures and direct estimation methods for building models for multiple classifications. Technometrics, 13:33--61, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. J. Han, J. Pei, and Y. Yin. Mining frequent patterns without candidate generation. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Database, pages 1--12. Dallas, TX, May 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. V. Harinarayan, A. Rajaraman, and J. Ullman. Implementing data cubes efficiently. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Database, pages 205--216. Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. S. Lauritzen. Graphical Models. Oxford University Press, 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. D. Pavlov, H. Mannila, and P. Symth. Probabilistic models for query approximation with large sparse binary data sets. In Proceedings of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 199--210. Stanford, California, June 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. S. Sarawagi, R. Agrawal, and N. Meggido. Discovery-driven explorations of olap data cubes. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Extending Data Base Technolgy, pages 168--182. Valencia, Spain, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. C. Silverstein, S. Brin, and R. Motwani. Beyond market baskets: Generalizing association rules to dependence rules. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2:39--68, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. R. Tarjan. Decomposition by clique separators. Discrete Mathematics, 55:221--232, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. J. Whittaker. Graphical Models in Applied Mathematical Multivariate Statistics. Wiley, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. X. Wu and D. Barbará. Modeling and imputation of large incomplete multidimensional datasets. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Warehousing and Knowledge Discovery. Aix-en-Provence, France, Septemeber 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Screening and interpreting multi-item associations based on log-linear modeling

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      KDD '03: Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
      August 2003
      736 pages
      ISBN:1581137370
      DOI:10.1145/956750

      Copyright © 2003 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 24 August 2003

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      KDD '03 Paper Acceptance Rate46of298submissions,15%Overall Acceptance Rate1,133of8,635submissions,13%

      Upcoming Conference

      KDD '24

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader