skip to main content
10.1145/971300.971387acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessigcseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Wanted: CS1 students. no experience required

Authors Info & Claims
Published:01 March 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper reports research on the effect of prior programming experience on success in an objects-first CS1. In an objects-first, approach students are taught from the very beginning to think in terms of objects and the fundamentals of object-oriented programming, encapsulation, inheritance, and polymorphism. These concepts are introduced before traditional selection and iterative constructs. The finding that students with prior programming experience do not do better than those without such experience flies in the face of conventional wisdom.

References

  1. Alphonce, C. G., & Ventura, P. R. (2002). Object orientation in CS1-CS2 by design. Paper presented at the 7th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Aarhus, Denmark. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Aron, A., & Aron, E. N. (2002). Statistics for the Behavioral and Social Sciences: A Brief Course (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bergin, J., Koffman, E., Proulx, V. K., Rasala, R., & Wolz, U. (1999). Objects: When, why, and how? Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 14(4).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Booch, G., Rumbaugh, J., & Jacobson, I. (1999). The Unified Modeling Language User Guide: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Cantwell Wilson, B., & Shrock, S. (2001). Contributing to success in an introductory computer science course: A study of twelve factors. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin , Proceedings of the thirty second SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer Science Education, 33(1), 184--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Culwin, F. (1999). Object Imperatives! ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, The proceedings of the thirtieth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 31(1), 31--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Dahl, O.-J., & Nygaard, K.How object-oriented programming started. Retrieved 04/06, 2002, from http://www.ifi.uio.no/~kristen/FORSKNINGSDOK_MAPPE/F_OO_start.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Evans, G. E., & Simkin, M. G. (1989). What best predicts computer proficiency? Communications of the ACM, 32(11), 1322--1327. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., & Vlissides, J. (1995). Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software: Addison-Wesley. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Hagan, D., & Markham, S. (2000). Does it help to have some programming experience before beginning a computing degree program? ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 5th annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, 32(3), 25--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kölling, M., & Rosenberg, J. (2001). Guidelines for teaching object orientation with Java. Proceedings of the 6th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, 33--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Meyer, B. (1997). Object-Oriented Software Construction, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Mitchell, W. (2001). A paradigm shift to OOP has occurred..implementation to follow. Journal of Computing in Small Colleges, 16(2), 95--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Nguyen, D. Z., & Wong, S. B. (2001). OOP in introductory CS: Better students through abstraction. Paper presented at the Fifth Workshop on and Tools for Assimilating Object-Oriented Concepts, OOPSLA01, Tampa, Florida.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Norusis, M. J. (2002). SPSS 11.0 Guide to Data Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Perry, J. E. (1996). An introduction to object-oriented design in C++: Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Ramalingam, V., & Wiedenbeck, S. (1998). Development and validation of scores on a computer programming self-efficacy scale and group analyses of novice programmer self-efficacy. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(4), 367--381.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. The Joint Task Force on Computing Curricula. (2001). Computing Curricula 2001 Computer Science: IEEE Computer Society & Association for Computing Machinery.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. van Dam, A. (2002). CS015 Home Page. Retrieved September 2, 2002, from http://www.cs.brown.edu/courses/cs015/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Ventura, P. R. (2002). Objects-first CS1 not considered harmful: An empirical investigation of CS1. Paper presented at the SIGCSE Doctoral Consortium, Covington, Kentucky.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Ventura, P. R., & Alphonce, C. G. (2001). Teaching OOD and OOP through Java and UML in CS 1 and 2. Paper presented at the Fifth Workshop on and Tools for Assimilating Object-Oriented Concepts, OOPSLA01, Tampa, Florida.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Weber-Wulff, D. (2000). Combating the code warrior: A different sort of programming instruction. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin , 5th annual SIGCSE/SIGCUE conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education, 32(3), 85--88. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Wong, S. B.CS150 Lab 3. Retrieved September 10, 2003, from http://exciton.cs.rice.edu/cs150/labs/lab3/default.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Wong, S. B., & Hutchinson, D.CS150 Lab 2. Retrieved September 10, 2003, from http://exciton.cs.rice.edu/cs150/labs/lab2/default.htmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Woodman, M., Davis, G., & Holland, S. (1996). The joy of software -- starting with objects. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin , Proceedings of the twenty-seventh SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education, 28(1), 88--92. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Wanted: CS1 students. no experience required

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      SIGCSE '04: Proceedings of the 35th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
      March 2004
      544 pages
      ISBN:1581137982
      DOI:10.1145/971300

      Copyright © 2004 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 1 March 2004

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • Article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate1,595of4,542submissions,35%

      Upcoming Conference

      SIGCSE Virtual 2024

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader