skip to main content
10.1145/985692.985732acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Isolating the effects of visual impairment: exploring the effect of AMD on the utility of multimodal feedback

Published:25 April 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

This study examines the effects of multimodal feedback on the performance of older adults with an ocular disease, Age-Related Macular Degeneration (AMD), when completing a simple computer-based task. Visually healthy older users (n = 6) and older users with AMD (n = 6) performed a series of drag-and-drop tasks that incorporated a variety of different feedback modalities. The user groups were equivalent with respect to traditional visual function metrics and measured subject cofactors, aside from the presence or absence of AMD. Results indicate that users with AMD exhibited decreased performance, with respect to required feedback exposure time. Some non-visual and multimodal feedback forms show potential as solutions to enhance performance, for those with AMD as well as for visually healthy older adults.

References

  1. Akamatsu, M. and Mackenzie, S.I. Movement characteristics using a mouse with tactile and force feedback. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 45. 483--493.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. American Macular Degeneration Foundation. What is macular degeneration?, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. American Medical Association. The Visual System. in Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment, American Medical Association, Chicago, IL, 1994, 209--222.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Belz, S.M. and Robinson, G.M. A new class of auditory warning signals for complex systems: Auditory Icons. Human Factors, 41 (4). 608--618.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Brewster, S.A., Sonically-enhanced drag and drop. in International Conference on Auditory Display, (Glasgow, UK, 1998), 1--7.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Brewster, S.A. and Crease, M.G. Correcting menu usability problems with sound. Behavior and Information Technology, 18 (3). 165--177.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Brewster, S.A., Wright, P.C. and Edwards, A.D.N., The design and evaluation of an auditory-enhanced scrollbar. in ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), (Boston, MA, 1994), 173--179.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Cooke, J.D., Brown, S.H. and Cunningham, D.A. Kinematics of arm movements in elderly humans. Neurobiology of Aging, 10. 159--165.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Farnsworth, D. The Farnsworth Dichotomous Test for Color Blindness: Manual. The Psychological Corporation, New York, NY, 1947.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Farrell, F.E. Fitting physical screen parameters to the human eye. in Roufs, J.A.J. ed. Vision and visual dysfunction: The man-machine interface, CRC, Boca Raton, FL, 1991.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Fraser, J. and Gutwin, C., A framework of assistive pointers for low vision users. in Fourth Annual International ACM/SIGCAPH Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS 2000), (Arlington, VA, 2000), 9--16.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gaver, W. The SonicFinder: An interface that uses auditory icons. Human Computer Interaction, 4 (1). 67--94.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Hedge, A. Human Information Processing (Course Lecture), 1999.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Inkpen, K.M. Drag-and-drop versus point-and-click mouse interaction styles for children. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interactions, 8 (1). 1--33.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Jacko, J.A., Barreto, A.B., Marmet, G.J., Chu, J.Y.M., Bautsch, H.S., Scott, I.U. and Rosa, R.H., Jr., Low vision: The role of visual acuity in the efficiency of cursor movement. in Fourth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies (ASSETS 2000), (2000), ACM, 1--8.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jacko, J.A., Rosa, R.H., Jr., Scott, I.U., Pappas, C.J. and Dixon, M.A. Visual impairment: The use of visual profiles in evaluations of icon use in computer-based tasks. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12 (1). 151--164.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jacko, J.A., Scott, I.U., Barreto, A.B., Bautsch, H.S., Chu, J.Y.M. and Fain, W.B., Iconic visual search strategies: A comparison of computer users with AMD versus computer users with normal vision. in 9th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, (New Orleans, LA, 2001), ACM, 423--427.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jacko, J.A., Scott, I.U., Sainfort, F., Barnard, L., Edwards, P.J., Emery, V.K., Kongnakorn, T., Moloney, K.P. and Zorich, B.S., Older adults and visual impairment: What do exposure times and accuracy tell us about performance gains associated with multimodal feedback? in ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2003), (Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 2003), 33--40.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Jacko, J.A. and Sears, A., Designing interfaces for an overlooked user group: Considering the visual profiles of partially sighted users. in ASSETS '98: The Third International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies, (1998), ACM.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Jacko, J.A. and Vitense, H.S. A review and reappraisal of information technologies within a conceptual framework for individuals with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society (UAIS), 1. 56--76.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Klatzky, R.L., Lederman, S.J. and Matula, D.E. Haptic exploration in the presence of vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 19 (4). 726--743.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Lundberg, L., Johannesson, M., Isacson, D. and Borquist, L. The relationship between health-state utilities and the SF-12 in a general population. Medical Decision Making, 19 (2). 128--140.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Mackenzie, I.S., Sellen, A. and Buxton, W.A.S., A comparison of input devices in elemental pointing and dragging tasks. in ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: Reaching through Technology (CHI '91), (New Orleans, LA, 1991), 161--166.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. McGee, M.R., Gray, P. and Brewster, S.A. The effective combination of haptic and auditory textural information. in Brewster, S.A. and Murray-Smith, R. eds. Haptic Human-Computer Interaction, Springer LNCS, 2001, 118--126.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Mead, S.E., Batsakes, P., Fisk, A.D. and Mykityshyn, A. Application of cognitive theory to training and design solutions for age-related computer use. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 23. 553--573.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Oakley, I., Brewster, S.A. and Gray, P.D., Solving multi-target haptic problems in menu interaction. in CHI '01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, (Seattle, Washington, 2001), ACM, 357--358.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Pelli, D.G., Robson, J.G. and Wilkins, A.J. The design of a new letter chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clinical Visual Science, 2. 187--199.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Scott, I.U., Feuer, W.J. and Jacko, J.A. Impact of visual function on computer task accuracy and reaction time in a cohort of patients with age-related macular degeneration. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 133 (3). 350--357.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Sellen, A.J., Kurtenbach, G.P. and Buxton, W.A.S. The prevention of mode errors through sensory feedback. Human Computer Interaction, 7. 141--164.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith, M.W., Sharit, J. and Czaja, S.J. Aging, Motor Control, and the Performance of Computer Mouse Tasks. Human Factors, 41 (3). 389--396.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. The Center for Macular Degeneration (UCSB). Biology of AMD, 2002.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Tiffin, J. and Asher, E.J. The Purdue Pegboard: Norms and studies of reliability and validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32. 234--247.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Vitense, H.S., Jacko, J.A. and Emery, V.K. Multimodal feedback: An assessment of performance and mental workload. Ergonomics, 46 (1-3). 58--87.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Ware, J.E., Kosinski, M. and Keller, S.D. How to Score the SF-12 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scales. The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, Boston, MA.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Wickens, C.D. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance. HarperCollins, New York, NY, 1992.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Isolating the effects of visual impairment: exploring the effect of AMD on the utility of multimodal feedback

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            CHI '04: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
            April 2004
            742 pages
            ISBN:1581137028
            DOI:10.1145/985692

            Copyright © 2004 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 25 April 2004

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • Article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader