skip to main content
10.1145/997078.997094acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesduxConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Visualizing health: imagery in diabetes education

Published:06 June 2003Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we describe research designed to impact diabetes education programs. We have tried to connect medical facts and information about diabetes to personal experiences by introducing photography as a tool for data collection. Diabetics typically measure their blood sugar levels to understand their physiological state, but these data cannot explain the causal factors leading to anomalous health. We have introduced additional qualitative data into the diabetes portfolio by having patients photograph their eating, exercise, and stress management habits. We discuss two related projects in the paper: a new approach to diabetes education courses and visualization software that allows photographs of behavior to be synchronized with glucose data. In both cases, our goal is to help diabetics reflect on their health practices, and to use personal imagery as data to explain their conditions.

References

  1. Alonso, D. L., Rose, A., Plaisant, C., & Norman, K. L. (1998). Viewing personal history records: A comparison of tabular format and graphical presentation using LifeLines. Behaviour & Information Technology, 17(5): 249--262.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bernstein, R. K. (1997). Dr. Bernstein's Diabetes Solution: A Complete Guide to Achieving Normal Blood Sugars. Boston, MA: Little, Brown & Company.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bransford, J. D., Sherwood, R. D., Hasselbring, T. S., Kinzer, C. K., & Williams, S. M. (1990). Anchored instruction: Why we need it and how technology can help. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.), Cognition, Education, and Multimedia: Exploring Ideas in High Technology (pp. 115--141). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Cappo, M. & Darling, K. (1996). Measurement in Motion. Communications of the ACM, 39(8): 91--93. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Collins, A. & Brown, J. S. (1988). The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In H. Mandl & A. Lesgold (Eds.), Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 1--18). New York: Springer-Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Committee on Health and Behavior. (2001). Health and Behavior: The Interplay of Biological, Behavioral, and Societal Influences. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Glasgow, R. E., Fisher, E. B., Anderson, B. J., LaGreca, A., Marrero, D., Johnson, S. B., Rubin, R. R., & Cox, D. J. (1999). Behavioral science in diabetes: Contributions and opportunities. Diabetes Care, 22: 832--843.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Goldman-Segall, R. (1997). Points of Viewing Children's Thinking: A Digital Ethnographer's Journey. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Gross, M. M. (1998). Analysis of human movement using digital video. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 7(4): 375--395. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Kilman, D. G. & Forslund, D. W. (1997). An international collaboratory based on virtual patient records. Communications of the ACM, 40(8): 111--117. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Klayman, J. & Ha, Y.-W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94: 211--228.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11): 2098--2109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Nardi, B. A., Kuchinsky, A., Whittaker, S., Leichner, R., & Schwarz, H. (1996). Video-as-data: Technical and social aspects of a collaborative multimedia application. Computer Supported Collaborative Work, 4: 73--100. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. National Institute of Diabetes & Digestive & Kidney Diseases. Diabetes Overview. 1998, National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, MD.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Norris, S. L., Engelgau, M. M., & Narayan, K. M. V. (2001). Effectiveness of self-management training in Type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care, 24: 561--587.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Plaisant, C., Milash, B., Rose, A., Widoff, S., & Shneiderman, B. (1996). LifeLines: Visualizing personal histories. In Proceedings of the CHI 96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 221--227). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Powsner, S. M. & Tufte, E. R. (1994). Graphical summary of patient status. The Lancet, 344: 386--389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Rich, M., Lamola, S., Amorty, C., & Schneider, L. (2000). Asthma in life context: Video intervention/prevention assessment (VIA). Pediatrics, 105(3): 469--477.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Rubin, A., Bresnahan, S., & Ducas, T. (1996). Cartwheeling through CamMotion. Communications of the ACM, 39(8): 84--85. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Rubin, A. & Win, D. (1994). Studying motion with KidVid: A data collection and analysis tool for digitized video. In Conference Companion to CHI '94 (pp. 13--14). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Schiffrin, A. & Belmonte, M. (1982). Multiple daily self-glucose monitoring: Its essential role in long term glucose control in insulin-dependent diabetic patients treated with pump and multiple subcutaneous injections. Diabetes Care, 5(5): 479--484.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Smith, B. K. (2002). You prick your finger, we do the rest: Glucose meter evolution. User Experience: The Magazine of the Usability Professionals' Association, 3: 31--34.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Smith, B. K. & Blankinship, E. (2000). Justifying imagery: Multimedia support for learning through explanation. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3&4): 749--767. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Smith, B. K., Blankinship, E., Ashford III, A., Baker, M., & Hirzel, T. (1999). Inquiry with imagery: Historical archive retrieval with digital cameras. In ACM Multimedia 99 Proceedings (pp. 405--408). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Smith, B. K. & Reiser, B. J. (1998). National Geographic unplugged: Classroom-centered design of interactive nature films. In Proceedings of the CHI 98 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 424--431). New York: ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Strowig, S. M. & Raskin, P. (1998). Improved glycemic control in intensively treated type 1 diabetic patients using blood glucose meters with storage capability and computer-assisted analyses. Diabetes Care, 21(10): 1694--1698.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Wason, P. C. (1960). On the failure to eliminate hypotheses in a conceptual task. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12(3): 129--140.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Whittaker, S. (1995). Rethinking video as a technology for interpersonal communications: Theory and design implications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42: 501--529. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Visualizing health: imagery in diabetes education

        Recommendations

        Reviews

        Andrew Brooks

        The use of visualization software and photography in the management of diabetes is discussed in this paper. Anecdotes are provided of the use of photographs of daily activities, taken by diabetics themselves, in group discussions during diabetes education. For example, a photograph of an unhealthy meal generated criticism by group members. Another photograph inadvertently captured poor eating habits. The photographs are also described as helping diabetics frame questions to ask healthcare professionals. Visualizations are shown of blood sugar levels, (high, acceptable, or low) by time of day and by day of the month, with corresponding photographs of daily activities (such as eating and exercise) taken on a particular day. For example, a photograph of a pizza is shown with a line graph of blood sugar levels indicating a dramatic rise after the pizza was eaten. Initial users of the software are, however, reported as having suffered confirmation bias; they were not altering their beliefs about how they should manage their diabetes. The authors conclude that the visualizations and photography must be interpreted in a collaborative setting. Good management of diabetes is of extreme importance. While this paper provides very useful insights into how visualization software incorporating photographic evidence can support the making of connections between lifestyle choices and blood sugar levels, experimental studies are required to determine whether the use of such software can result in better management of diabetes. This paper is highly recommended to healthcare specialists in diabetes, and those developing technology to support the management of it. Online Computing Reviews Service

        Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

        Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          DUX '03: Proceedings of the 2003 conference on Designing for user experiences
          June 2003
          301 pages
          ISBN:1581137281
          DOI:10.1145/997078

          Copyright © 2003 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 June 2003

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate59of59submissions,100%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader