skip to main content
research-article

A Bayesian approach to discovering truth from conflicting sources for data integration

Published:01 February 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

In practical data integration systems, it is common for the data sources being integrated to provide conflicting information about the same entity. Consequently, a major challenge for data integration is to derive the most complete and accurate integrated records from diverse and sometimes conflicting sources. We term this challenge the truth finding problem. We observe that some sources are generally more reliable than others, and therefore a good model of source quality is the key to solving the truth finding problem. In this work, we propose a probabilistic graphical model that can automatically infer true records and source quality without any supervision. In contrast to previous methods, our principled approach leverages a generative process of two types of errors (false positive and false negative) by modeling two different aspects of source quality. In so doing, ours is also the first approach designed to merge multi-valued attribute types. Our method is scalable, due to an efficient sampling-based inference algorithm that needs very few iterations in practice and enjoys linear time complexity, with an even faster incremental variant. Experiments on two real world datasets show that our new method outperforms existing state-of-the-art approaches to the truth finding problem.

References

  1. M. Arenas, L. E. Bertossi, and J. Chomicki. Consistent query answers in inconsistent databases. In PODS, pages 68--79, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Balakrishnan and S. Kambhampati. SourceRank: relevance and trust assessment for deep web sources based on inter-source agreement. In WWW, pages 227--236, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. L. Blanco, V. Crescenzi, P. Merialdo, and P. Papotti. Probabilistic models to reconcile complex data from inaccurate data sources. In CAiSE, pages 83--97, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. X. L. Dong, L. Berti-Equille, and D. Srivastava. Integrating conflicting data: The role of source dependence. PVLDB, 2(1):550--561, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. X. L. Dong, L. Berti-Equille, and D. Srivastava. Truth discovery and copying detection in a dynamic world. PVLDB, 2(1):562--573, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. D. Florescu, D. Koller, and A. Y. Levy. Using probabilistic information in data integration. In VLDB, pages 216--225, 1997. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. A. Galland, S. Abiteboul, A. Marian, and P. Senellart. Corroborating information from disagreeing views. In WSDM, pages 131--140, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. G. Kasneci, J. V. Gael, D. H. Stern, and T. Graepel. CoBayes: Bayesian knowledge corroboration with assessors of unknown areas of expertise. In WSDM, pages 465--474, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. J. M. Kleinberg. Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. J. ACM, 46(5):604--632, 1999. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. J. Pasternack and D. Roth. Knowing what to believe (when you already know something). In COLING, pages 877--885, 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. J. Pasternack and D. Roth. Making better informed trust decisions with generalized fact-finding. In IJCAI, pages 2324--2329, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. S. Russell and P. Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Prentice Hall, 3rd edition, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Wang, T. Abdelzaher, L. Kaplan, and C. Aggarwal. On quantifying the accuracy of maximum likelihood estimation of participant reliability in social sensing. In DMSN, pages 7--12, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. X. Yin, J. Han, and P. S. Yu. Truth discovery with multiple conflicting information providers on the web. In KDD, pages 1048--1052, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. X. Yin and W. Tan. Semi-supervised truth discovery. In WWW, pages 217--226, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in

Full Access

  • Published in

    cover image Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment
    Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment  Volume 5, Issue 6
    February 2012
    96 pages

    Publisher

    VLDB Endowment

    Publication History

    • Published: 1 February 2012
    Published in pvldb Volume 5, Issue 6

    Qualifiers

    • research-article

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader