skip to main content
10.3115/1073012.1073064dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Logic form transformation of WordNet and its applicability to question answering

Published:06 July 2001Publication History

ABSTRACT

WordNet is a rich source of world knowledge from which formal axioms can be derived. In this paper we present a method for transforming the WordNet glosses into logic forms and further into axioms. The transformation of WordNet glosses into logic forms is useful for theorem proving and other applications. The paper demonstrates the utility of the WordNet axioms in a question answering system to rank and extract answers.

References

  1. John Bear and R. Jerry Hobbs. 1988. Localizing expression of ambiguity. In Proceedings of the Second Conference on Applied Natural Language Processing, pages 235--242. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. R. Bruce and L. Guthrie. 1992. Genus disambiguation: A study in weighted preference. In Proceedings of COLING'92, Nantes, France. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Chodorow, R. Byrd, and G. Heidorn. 1985. Extracting semantic hierarchies from a large on-line dictionary. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Meting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 299--304. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. David Davidson. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In N. Rescher, editor, The Logic of Decision and Action, pages 81--95. University of Pittsburgh Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Sanda M. Harabagiu, A. George Miller, and Dan I. Moldovan. 1999. Wordnet 2 - a morphologically and semantically enhanced resource. In Proceedings of SIGLEX-99, pages 1--8, University of Maryland, June.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Sanda Harabagiu, Dan Moldovan, Marius Pasca, Rada Mihalcea, Mihai Surdeanu, Razvan Bunescu, Roxana Girju, Vasile Rus, and Paul Morarescu. 2000. FALCON: Boosting knowledge for answer engines. In Proceedings of the Text Retrieval Conference (TREC-9), November.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Jerry R. Hobbs. 1986. Overview of the tacitus project. Computational Linquistics, 12(3). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. ISI. 1998. http://www.isi.edu/naturallanguage/dpp/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. George Miller. 1995. Wordnet: a lexical database for english. Communications of the ACM, 38(11):39--41. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. NIST. 2000. National institute for science and technology. http://trec.nist.gov.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Stephen D. Richardson, William B. Dolan, and Lucy Vanderwende. 1998. Mindnet: acquiring and structuring semantic information from text. In Proceedings of COLING '98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. G. Rigau, H. Rogdriguez, and E. Agirre. 1998. Building accurate semantic taxonomies from monolingual mrds. In Proceedings of COLING-ACL'98, Montreal, Canada. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Y. A. Wilks, B. M. Slator, and L. M. Guthrie. 1996. Electric Words- Dictionaries, Computers and Meanings. The MIT Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    ACL '01: Proceedings of the 39th Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics
    July 2001
    562 pages

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 6 July 2001

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate85of443submissions,19%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader