skip to main content
10.3115/1220355.1220464dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescolingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Discriminative slot detection using kernel methods

Published:23 August 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

Most traditional information extraction approaches are generative models that assume events exist in text in certain patterns and these patterns can be regenerated in various ways. These assumptions limited the syntactic clues being considered for finding an event and confined these approaches to a particular syntactic level. This paper presents a discriminative framework based on kernel SVMs that takes into account different levels of syntactic information and automatically identifies the appropriate clues. Kernels are used to represent certain levels of syntactic structure and can be combined in principled ways as input for an SVM. We will show that by combining a low level sequence kernel with a high level kernel on a GLARF dependency graph, the new approach outperformed a good rule-based system on slot filler detection for MUC-6.

References

  1. D. Appelt, J. Hobbs, J. Bear, D. Israel, M. Kameyama, A. Kehler, D. Martin, K. Meyers, and M. Tyson 1996. SRI International FASTUS system: MUC-6 test results and analysis. In Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. H. L. Chieu, H. T. Ng, & Y. K. Lee. 2003. Closing the Gap: Learning-Based Information Extraction Rivaling Knowledge-Engineering Methods. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Collins and S. Miller. 1998. Semantic Tagging using a Probabilistic Context Free Grammar, In Proceedings of the Sixth Workshop on Very Large Corpora.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. M. Collins and N. Duffy. 2001. Convolution Kernels for Natural Language, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14, MIT Press.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. D. Fisher, S. Soderland, J. McCarthy, F. Feng and W. Lehnert. 1996. Description of The UMass System As Used For MUC-6. In Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. R. Grishman. 1996. The NYU System for MUC-6 or Where's the Syntax?. In Proceedings of the Sixth Message Understanding Conference.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. H. Lodhi, C. Sander, J. Shawe-Taylor, N. Christianini and C. Watkins. 2002. Text Classification using String Kernels. Journal of Machine Learning Research.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Meyers, R. Grishman, M. Kosaka and S. Zhao. 2001. Covering Treebanks with GLARF. In Proceedings of of the ACL Workshop on Sharing Tools and Resources.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. S. Miller, M. Crystal, H. Fox, L. Ramshaw, R. Schwartz, R. Stone, and R. Weischedel. 1998. BBN: Description of The SIFT System As Used For MUC-7, In Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understanding Conference.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. K.-R. Müller, S. Mika, G. Ratsch, K. Tsuda, B. Scholkopf. 2001. An introduction to kernel-based learning algorithms, IEEE Trans. Neural Networks, 12, 2, pages 181--201.]]Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. E. Riloff. 1993. Automatically constructing a dictionary for information extraction tasks. In Proceedings of the 11th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, 811--816.]]Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. V. N. Vapnik. 1998. Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley-Interscience Publication.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. D. Zelenko, C. Aone and A. Richardella. 2003. Kernel methods for relation extraction. Journal of Machine Learning Research.]] Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  1. Discriminative slot detection using kernel methods

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image DL Hosted proceedings
        COLING '04: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics
        August 2004
        1411 pages

        Publisher

        Association for Computational Linguistics

        United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 23 August 2004

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        COLING '04 Paper Acceptance Rate1,411of1,411submissions,100%Overall Acceptance Rate1,537of1,537submissions,100%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader