skip to main content
10.3115/1220355.1220544dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescolingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

HITIQA: towards analytical question answering

Authors Info & Claims
Published:23 August 2004Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we describe the analytic question answering system HITIQA (High-Quality Interactive Question Answering) which has been developed over the last 2 years as an advanced research tool for information analysts. HITIQA is an interactive open-domain question answering technology designed to allow analysts to pose complex exploratory questions in natural language and obtain relevant information units to prepare their briefing reports. The system uses novel data-driven semantics to conduct a clarification dialogue with the user that explores the scope and the context of the desired answer space. The system has undergone extensive hands-on evaluations by a group of intelligence analysts. This evaluation validated the overall approach in HITIQA but also exposed limitations of the current prototype.

References

  1. Allen, J. and M. Core. 1997. Draft of DAMSL: Dialog Act Markup in Several Layers. www.cs.rochester.edu/research/cisd.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckley, C. 1985. Implementation of the Smart information retrieval system. TR85-686, Computer Science, Cornell University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Ferguson, G. and J. Allen. 1998. TRIPS: An Intelligent Integrated Problem-Solving Assistant. AAAI-98 Conf., pp. 567--573. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Fillmore, C. & C. F. Baker. 2001. Frame semantics for text understanding. WordNet Workshop at NAACL.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Hardy, H., et al. 2002a. Cross-Document Summarization by Concept Classification. Proceedings of SIGIR, Tampere, Finland. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hardy, H., et al. 2002b. Multi-layer Dialogue Annotation for Automated Multilingual Customer Service. ISLE Workshop, UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Harabagiu, S., et. al. 2002. Answering Complex, List and Context questions with LCC's Question Answering Server. TREC-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Hovy, E., et al. 2000. Question Answering in Webclopedia. Notebook. Proceedings of Text Retrieval Conference TREC-9.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Humphreys, R. et al. 1998. Description of the LaSIE-II System as Used for MUC-7. Proc. of 7th Message Under. Conf. (MUC-7.).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Class and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Litman, Diane J. and Shimei Pan. 2002. Designing and Evaluating an Adaptive Spoken Dialogue System. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction. Vol. 12, No. 2/3, pp. 111--137. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Prager, J. et al, 2003. In Question-Answering Two Heads are Better Than One. Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2003, pp 24--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Seneff, S. and J. Polifroni. 2000. Dialogue Management in the MERCURY Flight Reservation System. ANLP-NAACL 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Small et al. 2004. A Data Driven Approach to Interactive Question Answering. In M. Maybury (ed). Future Directions in Automated Question Answering. MIT Press (to appear). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Strzalkowski, T and J. Wang. 1996. A self-learning Universal Concept Spotter. Proceedings of COLING-96, pp. 931--936. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Walker, M. A. 2002. An Application of Reinforcement Learning to Dialogue Strategy Selection in a Spoken Dialogue System for Email. Journal of AI Research, vol 12., pp. 387--416. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Wu, M. et al. 2003. Question Answering by Pattern Matching, Web-Proofing, Semantic Form Proofing. TREC-12.Notebook.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image DL Hosted proceedings
    COLING '04: Proceedings of the 20th international conference on Computational Linguistics
    August 2004
    1411 pages

    Publisher

    Association for Computational Linguistics

    United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 23 August 2004

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    COLING '04 Paper Acceptance Rate1,411of1,411submissions,100%Overall Acceptance Rate1,537of1,537submissions,100%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader