skip to main content
10.3115/977035.977050dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseaclConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

Full text parsing using cascades of rules: an information extraction perspective

Authors Info & Claims
Published:08 June 1999Publication History

ABSTRACT

This paper proposes an approach to full parsing suitable for Information Extraction from texts. Sequences of cascades of rules deterministically analyze the text, building unambiguous structures. Initially basic chunks are analyzed; then argumental relations are recognized; finally modifier attachment is performed and the global parse tree is built. The approach was proven to work for three languages and different domains. It was implemented in the IE module of FACILE, a EU project for multilingual text classification and IE.

References

  1. Steven Abney. 1996. Partial parsing via finitestate cascades. In Proceedings of the ESSLI '96 Robust Parsing Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Chinatsu Aone, Lauren Halverson, Tom Hampton, and Mila Ramos-Santacruz. 1998. SRA: description of the IE2 system used for MUC-7. In Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understanding Conference (MUC-7), http://www.muc.saic.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Douglas E. Appelt, Jerry R. Hobbs, John Bear, David Israel, and Mabry Tyson. 1993. FASTUS: A finite-state processor for information extraction from real-world text. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Chambery, FranceGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Fabio Ciravegna, Alberto Lavelli, Nadia Mana, Luca Gilardoni, Silvia Mazza, Massimo Ferraro, Johannes Matiasek, William J. Black, Fabio Rinaldi, and David Mowatt. 1999. FACILE: Classifying texts integrating pattern matching and information extraction. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Stockholm, Sweden. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Aaron Douthat. 1998. The message understanding conference scoring software user's manual. In Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understanding Conference (MUC-7), http://www.muc.saic.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Ralph Grishman. 1995. The NYU system for MUC-6 or where's syntax? In Sixth message understanding conference MUC-6. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Ralph Grishman. 1997. Information extraction: Techniques and challenges. In M. T. Pazienza, editor, Information Extraction: a multidisciplinary approach to an emerging technology. Springer Verlag. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Megumi Kameyama. 1997. Recognizing referential links: An information extraction perspective. In Mitkov and Boguraev, editors, Proceedings of ACL/EACL Workshop on Operational Factors in Practical, Robust Anaphora Resolution for Unrestricted Texts, Madrid, Spain. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Adam Kilgarriff. 1997. Foreground and background lexicons and word sense disambiguation for information extraction. In International Workshop on Lexically Driven Information Extraction, Frascati, Italy.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. MUC7. 1998. Proceedings of the Seventh Message Understanding Conference (MUC-7). SAIC, http://www.muc.saic.com/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  1. Full text parsing using cascades of rules: an information extraction perspective

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image DL Hosted proceedings
        EACL '99: Proceedings of the ninth conference on European chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics
        June 1999
        310 pages

        Publisher

        Association for Computational Linguistics

        United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 8 June 1999

        Qualifiers

        • Article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate100of360submissions,28%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader