skip to main content
10.1145/3022227.3022248acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicuimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Effects of quizzes in marking supported e-learning

Published:05 January 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Marking on a textbook when studying is a natural and subjective learning activity conducted by a learner. Such activity can be positively utilized in the learning process. If we could extract marked phrases or sentences, it will be possible to develop personalized quizzes to support active learning. In this study, we presented a learning support model to use quizzes generated from markings on a digital teaching document. In this paper, the framework of the environment is explained. We conducted three experimental studies to explore the effects of the quizzes in the learning process. We examined the changes of marking after these quizzes, as well as the test scores corresponding to the markings. We conclude that the proposed model can be useful in improving e-learning.

References

  1. Jackson, H. J. 2002. Marginalia. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, T. H. 1978. Another Look at the Self-Questioning Study Technique. Reading Education Report no. 6, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign: Center for the Study of Reading.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Iwane, N., Gao, C., and Yoshida, M. 2013. Question Generation for Learner Centered Learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 330--332. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Iwane, N., Gao, C., and Yoshida, M. 2013. A Method for knowledge Acquisition from Handwritten Marks on Digital Text. In Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Smart Technologies for Energy, Information and Communication, 89--95.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Iwane, N. and Gao, C. 2014. A Study of Using Handwritten Annotations on Digital Textbooks. In Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Advanced Applied Informatics, 287--290.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Marshall, C., Price, M., Golovchinsky, G, and Schilit, B. 2001. Designing e-Books for Legal Research, In Proceedings of the 1st ACM/IEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, 41--48. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Mostow, J. and Jang, H. 2012. Generating Diagnostic Multiple Choice Comprehension Cloze Questions, In Proceedings of of Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, 136--146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Dunlosky1, J., Rawson1, K.A., Marsh, E.J., Nathan, M.J., and Willingham, D.T. 2013. Improving Students' Learning with Effective Learning Techniques: Promising Directions from Cognitive and Educational Psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1) 4--58Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Yue, C.L., Storm, B.C, Kornell, N., and Bjork, E.L. 2014. Highlighting and Its Relation to Distributed Study and Students' Metacognitive Beliefs. Educational Psycholo.gy Review, 27(1), 69--78Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Bell, K. E., and Limber, J. E. 2010. Reading skill, textbook marking, and course performance. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49, 56--67.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Shin, D., An, H., & Kim, J. (in-press). How the second screens change the way people interact and learn: The effects of second screen use on information processing. Interactive Learning Environment. In-press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Shin, D., Biocca, F., & Choo, H. 2013. Exploring the user experience of three dimensional virtual learning environments. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32 (2), 203--214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Shin, D., Shin, Y., Choo, H., & Beom, K. 2011. Smartphones as smart pedagogical tools: Implications for smartphones as u-learning devices. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2207--2214. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Junco, R. and Clem, C. 2015. Predicting course outcomes with digital textbook usage data. Internet and Higher Education 27, 54--63Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Effects of quizzes in marking supported e-learning

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      IMCOM '17: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
      January 2017
      746 pages
      ISBN:9781450348881
      DOI:10.1145/3022227

      Copyright © 2017 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 5 January 2017

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      IMCOM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate113of366submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate213of621submissions,34%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader