ABSTRACT
In this paper we present the experience gained and lessons learned when the IT department at Statoil ASA, a large Oil and Gas company in Norway, extended their Enterprise Architecture with strategic level Domain-Driven design techniques and used the extended Enterprise Architecture to improve the software architecture of a large enterprise system.Traditionally, Enterprise Architecture has been prescribed as the key tool to conquer complexity and align IT development with business priorities and strategies, but we found our Enterprise Architecture too coarse to be practical useful at the software level.By extending our Enterprise Architecture with context maps and the process of context mapping valuable insight was gained, insight that enabled better scoping of new projects and architectural improvement of existing software in a controlled way.In addition, use of responsibility layers combined with context maps reduces the perceived complexity of the architecture. Use of other techniques such as distillation and identification of the core domain looks promising at the tactical level of a single project, but its value is more uncertain at the strategic level.The key issue is that large enterprise systems do not have a single core. On the other hand, at the project level, there should always be a core, and the project is best of by knowing its core domain and aim its best resources to work with the core.
- Armour., Kaisler. and Y. Liu. A big picture look at enterprise architecture, IEEE IT Pro January/February 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Armour., Kaisler. and Valivullah. Enterprise Architecting: Critical Problems, IEEE Proceedings of the 38 Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences - 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Evans E., Domain-Driven Design, Tackling Complexity in the Heart of Software, Addison-Wesley, 2003, ISBN 0-321-12521-5. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Domain-Driven design, http://domaindrivendesign.org.Google Scholar
- Hitchins D. K. Advanced Systems, thinking, engineering and management, Artech House, 2003, ISBN 1-58053-619-0.Google Scholar
- Zachman J., http://www.zifa.com.Google Scholar
- Rechtin E. and Maier M. The art of systems architecting, CRC Press, 2002, ISBN 0-8493-0440-7. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Service Oriented Architecture (SOA), http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service_oriented_architecture.Google Scholar
- TAFIM, http://www.sei.cmu.edu/str/descriptions/tafim.html.Google Scholar
- TOGAF, http://www.opengroup.org/architecture/togaf.Google Scholar
- Wesenberg, H., Landre, E., and Rønneberg, H. Using Domain-Driven Design to evaluate commercial-off-the-shelf software, OOPSLA 2006. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Architectural improvement by use of strategic level domain-driven design
Recommendations
Using domain-driven design to evaluate commercial off-the-shelf software
OOPSLA '06: Companion to the 21st ACM SIGPLAN symposium on Object-oriented programming systems, languages, and applicationsPurchasing a Commercial-Off-The-Shelf (COTS) package solution can be a complex and daunting task. Selecting and evaluating the right candidate is difficult, especially when the solution aims at the heart of company business. The company's competitive ...
Modelling Strategic Alignment of Business and IT through Enterprise Architecture
In the last decade, Enterprise Architecture (EA) has been proposed to have the potential to improve and support strategic alignment between business and IT. This paper presents a new model, using a new modelling technique based on two leading modelling ...
Architectural representations for describing enterprise information and data
ICCOMP'06: Proceedings of the 10th WSEAS international conference on ComputersEnterprise Architecture is a generalised term, which refers to a number of architectural representations each based on a different viewpoint. The core representations being: the Business, the Information, the Application and the Technology ...
Comments