skip to main content
10.1145/1592568.1592584acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescommConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free Access

Cutting the electric bill for internet-scale systems

Published:16 August 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

Energy expenses are becoming an increasingly important fraction of data center operating costs. At the same time, the energy expense per unit of computation can vary significantly between two different locations. In this paper, we characterize the variation due to fluctuating electricity prices and argue that existing distributed systems should be able to exploit this variation for significant economic gains. Electricity prices exhibit both temporal and geographic variation, due to regional demand differences, transmission inefficiencies, and generation diversity. Starting with historical electricity prices, for twenty nine locations in the US, and network traffic data collected on Akamai's CDN, we use simulation to quantify the possible economic gains for a realistic workload. Our results imply that existing systems may be able to save millions of dollars a year in electricity costs, by being cognizant of locational computation cost differences.

References

  1. R. H. Katz, "Tech Titans Building Boom," IEEE Spectrum, February 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. K. G. Brill, "The Invisible Crisis in the Data Center: The Economic Meltdown of Moore's Law," white paper, Uptime Institute, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. "Server and Data Center Energy Efficiency," Final Report to Congress, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Google Inc., "Efficient Computing: Data Centers." http://www.google.com/corporate/green/ datacenters/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. X. Fan, W.-D. Weber, and L. A. Barroso, "Power Provisioning for a Warehouse-sized Computer," in ACM International Symposium on Computer Architecture, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. L. A. Barroso and U. Hölzle, "The Case for Energy Proportional Computing," IEEE Computer, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. D. Meisner, B. T. Gold, and T. F. Wenisch, "PowerNap: Eliminating Server Idle power," in ACM ASPLOS, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. G. Chen, W. He, J. Liu, S. Nath, L. Rigas, L. Xiao, and F. Zhao, "Energy-Aware Server Provisioning and Load dispatching for Connection-Intensive Internet Services," in NSDI, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. VMware DRS: Dynamic Scheduling of System Resources.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. N. Tolia, Z. Wang, M. Marwah, C. Bash, P. Ranganathan, and X. Zhu, "Delivering Energy Proportionality with Non Energy-Proportional Systems - Optimizing the Ensemble," in HotPower, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. N. Joukov and J. Sipek, "GreenFS: Making Enterprise Computers Greener by Protecting Them Better," in ACM Eurosys, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Randy Shoup, "Scalability Best Practices: Lessons from eBay."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. J. Markoff and S. Hansell, "Hiding in Plain Sight, Google Seeks an Expansion of Power," the New York Times, June 2006.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Microsoft Environmental Sustainability group, "Q&A with Rob Bernard," Video.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. "61 Billion Searches Conducted Worldwide in August," Press Release, comScore Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. United States Department of Energy, Official Statistics. http://www.eia.doe.gov.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. World Bank, "World Development Indicators Database."Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Platts, "Day-Ahead Market Prices," in Megawatt Daily, McGraw-Hill. 2006-2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. United States Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Market Oversight. http://www.ferc.gov.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Midwest ISO, "Market Concepts Study Guide," 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. P. L. Joskow, "Markets for Power in the United States: an Interim Assessment," Aug. 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Severin Borenstein, "The Trouble With Electricity Markets: Understanding California's Restructuring Disaster," Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. L. Hadsell and H. A. Shawky, "Electricity Price Volatility and the Marginal Cost of Congestion: An Empirical Study of Peak Hours on the NYISO Market," The Energy Journal.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. U. Hölzle, "Powering a Google Search," Official Google Blog, Jan. 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. J. Chabarek, J. Sommers, P. Barford, C. Estan, D. Tsiang, and S. Wright, "Power Awareness in Network Design and Routing," INFOCOM, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. "Commonwealth Edison." www.comed.com.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. K. C. Martin, P. L. Joskow, and A. D. Ellerman, "Time and Location Differentiated NOX Control in Competitive Electricity Markets Using Cap-and-Trade Mechanisms," April 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Cutting the electric bill for internet-scale systems

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        SIGCOMM '09: Proceedings of the ACM SIGCOMM 2009 conference on Data communication
        August 2009
        340 pages
        ISBN:9781605585949
        DOI:10.1145/1592568
        • cover image ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review
          ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review  Volume 39, Issue 4
          SIGCOMM '09
          October 2009
          325 pages
          ISSN:0146-4833
          DOI:10.1145/1594977
          Issue’s Table of Contents

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 16 August 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate554of3,547submissions,16%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader