skip to main content
10.1145/191666.191679acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article
Free Access

An improved interface for tutorial dialogues: browsing a visual dialogue history

Authors Info & Claims
Published:24 April 1994Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1.Carenini, G., Ponzi, M. and Stock, O. Combining Natural Language and Hypermedia as New Means for Information Access. In Proceedings of the Fifth European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics (Urbino, Italy), 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.Carenini, G. and Moore, J.D. Generating explanations in context. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Intelligent User Interfaces (Orlando, USA), January 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3.Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M., Reimann, P. and Glaser R. Self-Explanations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Lea~ng to Solve Problems. Cognitive Science 13, 2, (1989), 145-182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. 4.Cohen, ER. The Role of Natural Language in a Multimodal Interface. In Proceedings of Fifth Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, (Monterey, CA), 1992, pp. 143-149. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. 5.Collins, A. and Brown, J.S. The computer as a tool for learning through reflection. In Learning Issues for Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Mandl & Lesgold (eds), Springer Verlag, New-York, 1988, pp. 1-18. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.DahlbaeE, N., JOnssort, A. and Ahrenberg L. Wizard of Oz studies - why and how. In Proceedings of the international workshop on Intelligent User interfaces, (Orlando, Florida, January), 1993, pp. 193-200. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7.Gagn6, E.D., Yekovich, C.W. and Yekovich F.R. The cognitive psychology of school learning, Harper Collins, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.Glyrm S.M. Explaining science concepts: a teachingwith-analogies model. In The Psychology of Learning Science, Glynn, Yeany, Britton (eds), HiUsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1991, pp. 219-240.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.Hayes-Roth, B. and Thorndyke, P.W. Integration of knowledge from text. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 18, 1979, pp. 91-108.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. 10.Kurlander, D. and Feiner S. A Visual Language for Browsing, Undoing, and Redoing Graphical Interface Commands. In Hsual Languages and Hsual Programming, S.K. Chang (ed.), Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1990, pp. 257-275.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.Lambert, L. and Carberry, S. A Tripartite Plan-Based Model of Dialogue. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (Berkeley, CA, June), 1991, pp. 47-54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12.Lesgold, A., Lajoie, S., Bunzo, M. and Eggan G. Sherlock: A Coached Practice Environment for an Electronics Troubleshooting Job. In Computer Assisted Instruction and Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Shared Goals and Complementary Approaches, Larkin, Jill, Chabay, Ruth (eds), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.Moore, J. D. What Makes Human Explanations Effecfive? In Proceedings of the Fifteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.Moore, J.D. and Swartout W.R. Pointing: a way toward explanation dialogue. In Proceedings of AAAI'90, pp. 457--464. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15.Pokorny, R. and Gott, S. The evaluation of a real-world instructional system: Using technical experts as raters. Technical report, Armstrong Laboratodes, Brooks Air Force Base, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.Ramshaw, L. A Three-Level Model for Plan Exploration. In Proceedings of the Twenty.Ninth Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, (Berkeley, CA, June), 1991, pp. 39-46. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17.Reiser, B.I., Friedmann, P., Gevins, J., Kimberg, D.Y., Ranney, M. and Romero A. A Graphical Programming Language Interface for an Intelligent Lisp Tutor. In Proceedings of the ACM CH1'88 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1988, pp. 39-44. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18.Rosenblum, J.A. and Moore J.D. Participating in instructional dialogues: finding and exploiting relevant prior explanations, in Proceedings of the Worm Conference on AI in Education, (Edinburgh), 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. An improved interface for tutorial dialogues: browsing a visual dialogue history

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '94: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 1994
          483 pages
          ISBN:0897916506
          DOI:10.1145/191666

          Copyright © 1994 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 24 April 1994

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • Article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '94 Paper Acceptance Rate70of263submissions,27%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader