Thomas W. Malone
ABSTRACT
In this paper, I will discuss two questions: (1) Why are computer games so captivating? and (2) How can the features that make computer games captivating be used to make other user interfaces interesting and enjoyable to use?
After briefly summarizing several studies of what makes computer games fun, I will discuss some guidelines for designing enjoyable user interfaces. Even though I will focus primarily on what makes systems enjoyable, I will suggest how some of the same features that make systems enjoyable can also make them easier to learn and to use.
- 1.Berlyne, D. E., (1965) Structure and direction in thinking. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- 2.Bricklin, D., & Frankston, B. (1979). VisiCalc Computer Software Program. Sunnyvale, Calif.: Personal Software, Inc.Google Scholar
- 3.Carroll, J. M., & Thomas, J. C. (1980). Metaphor and the cognitive representation of computing systems. Yorktown Heights, N.Y.: IBM Watson Research Center technical report no. RC 8302.Google Scholar
- 4.Dugdale, S. & Kibbey, D. (1975). Fractions curriculum of the PLATO elementary school mathematics project. Computer-based Education Research Laboratory Technical report. University of Illinois, Urbana, Ill.Google Scholar
- 5.Fischer, G., Burton, R R., & Brown, J. S. (1978). Aspects of a theory of simplification, debugging, and coaching. Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference of the Canadian Society for Computational Studies of Intelligence. Also available as Bolt Beranek and Newman, Inc. Technical report no. 3912 (ICAI Report No. 10), Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
- 6.Halasz, F., & Moran, T. P. (1982). Analogy considered harmful. Proceedings of the conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, Gaithersburg, Maryland, March 15-17, 1982. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 7.Macdonald, N. H., Frase, L. T., Gingrich, P. S., Keenan, S. A. (1982) The Writer's Workbench: Computer Aids for Text Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Communications, in press (January 1982).Google ScholarCross Ref
- 8.Malone, T. W. (1980). What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Psychology, Stanford University. Also available as technical report no. CIS-7 (SSL-80-11), Xerox Palo Alto Research Center, Palo Alto, Calif.Google Scholar
- 9.Malone, T. W. (1981a). What makes computer games fun? Byte, 6, 258-277.Google Scholar
- 10.Malone, T. W. (1981b). Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science 5, in press.Google Scholar
- 11.Piaget, J. (1951). Play, dreams, and imitation in childhood. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games
Recommendations
Building blocks for creating enjoyable games—A systematic literature review
Highlights- Game design elements that improve player enjoyment in games are presented in the article as a result of the systematic review.
AbstractDesigning serious games that engage lots of players is still a challenge, especially for domains that introduce complex, specialised, and tedious tasks that are difficult to represent in a game in terms of entertainment. Therefore, ...
GameFlow heuristics for designing and evaluating real-time strategy games
IE '12: Proceedings of The 8th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Playing the SystemThe GameFlow model strives to be a general model of player enjoyment, applicable to all game genres and platforms. Derived from a general set of heuristics for creating enjoyable player experiences, the GameFlow model has been widely used in evaluating ...
Comments