skip to main content
10.1145/1273496.1273509acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicmlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
Article

Efficiently computing minimax expected-size confidence regions

Published:20 June 2007Publication History

ABSTRACT

Given observed data and a collection of parameterized candidate models, a 1 -- α confidence region in parameter space provides useful insight as to those models which are a good fit to the data, all while keeping the probability of incorrect exclusion below α. With complex models, optimally precise procedures (those with small expected size) are, in practice, difficult to derive; one solution is the Minimax Expected-Size (MES) confidence procedure. The key computational problem of MES is computing a minimax equilibria to a certain zero-sum game. We show that this game is convex with bilinear payoffs, allowing us to apply any convex game solver, including linear programming. Exploiting the sparsity of the matrix, along with using fast linear programming software, allows us to compute approximate minimax expected-size confidence regions orders of magnitude faster than previously published methods. We test these approaches by estimating parameters for a cosmological model.

References

  1. Astier, P., et al. (2006). The Supernova Legacy Survey: measurement of Ω M , Ω and w from the first year data set. Astronomy and Astrophysics, 447, 31--48.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Bryan, B., et al. (2005). Active learning for identifying function threshold boundaries. In Advances in neural information processing systems 18. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Evans, S. N., Hansen, B. B., & Stark, P. B. (2005). Minimax expected measure confidence sets for restricted location parameters. Bernoulli, 11, 571--590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Genovese, C. et al. (2004). Nonparametric inference for the cosmic microwave background. Statistical Science, 19, 308--321.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Koller, D., Megiddo, N., & von Stengel, B. (1994). Fast algorithms for finding randomized strategies in game trees. STOC. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. McMahan, H. B. (2006). Robust planning in domains with stochastic outcomes, adversaries, and partial observability. Doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. McMahan, H. B., & Gordon, G. J. (2007). A fast bundle-based anytime algorithm for poker and other convex games. Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. McMahan, H. B., Gordon, G. J., & Blum, A. (2003). Planning in the presence of cost functions controlled by an adversary. ICML 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Morrison, D., Wolff, S., & Fraknoi, A. (1995). Abell's exploration of the universe. Saunders College Publishing. 7th edition.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Neyman, J., & Pearson, K. (1933). On the problem of the most efficient test of statistical hypotheses. Phil. Trans. of Royal Soc. of London, 231, 289--337.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Pratt, J. W. (1961). Length of confidence intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 56, 549--567.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Robertson, H. (1936). An interpretation of page's "new relativity". Phyiscal Review, 49, 755--760.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Schafer, C., & Stark, P. (2006). Constructing Confidence Sets of Optimal Expected Size (Technical Report 836). Department of Statistics, Carnegie Mellon University.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Schafer, C. M., & Stark, P. B. (2003). Using what we know: Inference with physical constraints. PHYSTAT 2003: Statiscal Problems in Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Wasserman, L. (2004). All of statistics. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Recommendations

Comments

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Sign in
  • Published in

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    ICML '07: Proceedings of the 24th international conference on Machine learning
    June 2007
    1233 pages
    ISBN:9781595937933
    DOI:10.1145/1273496

    Copyright © 2007 ACM

    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    • Published: 20 June 2007

    Permissions

    Request permissions about this article.

    Request Permissions

    Check for updates

    Qualifiers

    • Article

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate140of548submissions,26%

PDF Format

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader