Robert S. Fish
Robert E. Kraut
ABSTRACT
Collaborations in organizations thrive on communication that is informal because informal communication is frequent, interactive, and expressive. Informal communication is crucial for the coordination of work, learning an organization's culture, the perpetuation of the social relations that underlie collaboration, and, in general, any situation that requires communication to resolve ambiguity. Informal communication is traditionally mediated by physical proximity, but physical proximity cannot mediate in geographically distributed organizations. The research described here evaluates the adequacy of a version of a desktop video/audio conferencing system for supporting informal communication in a research and development laboratory. The evaluation took place during a trial in which the system was used by summer employees and their supervisor-mentors. While the system was used frequently, the most common uses and users' assessments suggest that it was used more like a telephone or electronic mail than like physically mediated face-to-face communication. However, some features of its use transcended traditional media and allowed users to gain awareness of their work environment. The paper concludes with a discussion of requirements for successful technology to support informal communication.
- 1.Abel, M.J. (1990). Experiences in an exploratory distributed organization. In J. Galegher & R. Kraut (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technological foundations of group work. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- 2.Altman, S., Valenzi, E. & Hodgetts, R. (1985) Organizational behavior: Theory and practice. Orlando, Florida: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- 3.Borning, A. & Travers, M. (1991) Two approaches to casual interaction over computer and video networks. In Proceedings of CHI "91, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (New Orleans, Louisiana) Association for Computing Machinery, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 4.Bulick, S., Abel, M., Corey, D., Schmidt, J. & Coffin, S. (1989) The U.S.West Advanced Technologies prototype multi-media communications system. Globecom'89: Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference. Dallas, Texas.Google Scholar
- 5.Cruz, G.C., Gomez, L.M., & Wilner, W.T. (1991) Tools to support conversational multimedia. In Globecom '91, Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, Phoenix, Arizona.Google Scholar
- 6.Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1984). Information richness: A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol, 6). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.Google Scholar
- 7.Daft, R. L. & Lengel, R. H. (1986) Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural design. Management Science, 32, 554-571. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 8.Fish, R. S. (1989) CRUISER: A multimedia system for social browsing. Siggraph Video Review, Vol 45, No. 6 New York: Association for Computing MachineryGoogle Scholar
- 9.Fish, R.S., Kraut, R.E., & Chalfonte, B.L. The VideoWindow system in informal communications. In Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW "90), pp. 1-11, Los Angeles, California, ACM Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 10.Goodman, G. O. & Abel, M. J. (1987) Communication and collaboration" Facilitating cooperative work through communication. Office: Technology and People, 3, 129-146. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 11.Heath, C. & Luff, P. (1991) Disembodied conduct: Communication through video in a multi-media office environment, In Proceedings of CHI '91, Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. (New Orleans, Louisiana) Association for Computing Machinery, New York. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 12.Johnson, S.C. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika, 32, 241-254.Google Scholar
- 13.Kendon, A. & Ferber, A. (1973). A description of some human greetings. In R. Michael & J. Crook (Eds.), Comparative ecology and behavior of primates. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- 14.Kiesler, S., Siegel, J. & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computer-mediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123- 1134.Google Scholar
- 15.Knapp, Mark L.(1978). Social intercourse: From greeting to goodbye. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
- 16.Kraut, R.E., Fish, R.S., Root, R.W., & Chalfonte, B.L. (1990). Informal communication in organizations: Form, function, and technology. In S. Oskamp & S. Spacapan (Eds)., Human Reactions to Technology: The Claremont Symposium on Applied Social Psychology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications. Pp 145-199.Google Scholar
- 17.Kruskal, J. (1964) Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika, 29, 1-27.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 18.Kruskal, J., Young, F. & Seery, J. (1977) How to use KYST- 2A, a very flexible program to do multidimensional scaling and unfolding. Unpublished paper, Bell LaboratoriesGoogle Scholar
- 19.Louie, G., Mantei, M., & Buxton, W.A.S. (1991) Making contact in a multi-media environment. HCI Consortium on CSCW, Ann Arbor, MI., February, 1991.Google Scholar
- 20.Mayer, M. (1977). The telephone and the uses of time. In I. de Sola Pool (Ed.) The social impact of the telephone. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. Pp 225-245.Google Scholar
- 21.Monge, P. R., Rothman, L. W., Eisenberg, E. M., Miller, K. L. & Kirste, K. K. (1985). The dynamics of organizational proximity. Management Science 31, 1129-1141.Google ScholarDigital Library
- 22.Olson, M. & Bly, S. (1991). The Portland experience: A report on a distributed research group. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, " 211-228. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 23.Perry, C. R. (1977) The British experience 1876- 1912: The impact of the telephone during the years of delay. In i. de Sola Pool (Ed.) The social impact of the telephone. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- 24.Rockoff, Maxine (1975a). An overview of some technological/heath-care system implications of seven exploratory broad-band communication experiments. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-23, 20-30.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 25.Rockoff, Maxine (1975b). The social implications of health care communication systems. IEEE Transactions on Communications, COM-23 (10), 1085-1088.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 26.Root, R.W. (1988). Design of a multi-media system for social browsing. Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. Portland, OR, 25-38. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 27.Shepard, R. N. (1962) The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. Psychometrika, 27,127-140, 219-246.Google Scholar
- 28.Short, J., Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976) The social psychology of telecommunications. London: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- 29.Stohl, C. & Redding, W. C. (1987). Messages and message exchange processes. In J. Jablin, L. Putnam, K. Roberts, & L. Porter (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Communication. Newbury Park, CA" Sage Publications. Pp. 451-502.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication
Recommendations
Informal communication in collaboratories
CHI EA '06: CHI '06 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing SystemsRecent years have seen an increasing use of collaboratories in distributed scientific work. This study examines the role of collaboratories in informal scientific communication. Hypotheses relating to potential opportunities for informal communication ...
Using IT to reengineer business education: an exploratory investigation of collaborative telelearning
Special issue on IS curricula and pedagogyThis longitudinal field study (three work sessions plus an initial training session), investigates the efficacy of a new technology -- desktop videoconferencing (DVC) -- in support of collaborative telelearning (i.e., collaborative learning among non-...
Comments