skip to main content
10.1145/2016911.2016919acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicerConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Research design: necessary bricolage

Published:08 August 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper we suggest that in order to advance, the field of computer science education needs to craft its own research methods, to augment the borrowing of "traditional" methods such as semi-structured interviews and surveys from other research traditions. Two example instruments used in our recent research are discussed. We adopt the metaphor of "bricolage" to characterise not only what researchers do, but to argue that this may be a necessary step towards developing theory.

References

  1. Barker, L., Garvin-Doxas, K. and Jackson, M. (2002). Defensive climate in the computer science classroom. In Proceedings of the 33rd SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education (SIGCSE '02). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bruner, J. (1987). Life as narrative. Social Research 54(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Cole, M. (1998). Cultural Psychology: A Once and Future Discipline, Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Collins, H. (2001). What is tacit knowledge? In Schatzky, T., Knorr Cetina, K., and von Savigny, E. (Eds.) The practice turn in contemporary theory. Routledge.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Denzin, N. and Lincoln, Y. (2008). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials, 3e. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Do, A., Rupert, A., and Wolford, G. (2008). Evaluations of pleasurable experiences: The peak-end rule. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 15(1):96--98.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Eckerdal, A., Thuné, M., and Berglund, A. (2005). What does it take to learn 'programming thinking'?. In Proceedings of the first international workshop on Computing education research (ICER '05). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Fensham, P. J. (2004). Defining an Identity: The Evolution of Science Education as a Field of Research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Fincher, S. and Petre, M. (2004). Computer science education research. Routledge-Falmer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Gaver, B., Dunne, T., and Pacenti, E. (1999). Design: Cultural probes. interactions 6(1): 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Goody, J. (1977). The domestication of the savage mind. Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Harper, D. (1987). Working knowledge: Skill and community in a small shop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Harper, D. (2002). Talking about pictures: A case for photo elicitation. Visual studies 17(1):13--26.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Kerth, N. L. (2001). Project retrospectives : a handbook for team reviews. New York: Dorset House. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Klein, G. (1999). Sources of power. MIT Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Labov, W. & Waletzky, J. (1967). Narrative analysis: Oral versions of personal experience. In J. Helm (Ed.), Essays on the verbal and visual arts: Proceedings of the 1996 Annual spring Meeting of the American Ethnological Society (pp12--44). Univeristy of Washington Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Levine, R. (1997). A geography of time. Basic Books.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Levine, L., Safer, M., and Lench, H. (2006). Remembering and misremembering emotions. In Sanna, L. and Chang, E. (Eds.) Judgments over time: The interplay of thoughts, feelings, and behaviors. Oxford University Pres.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Mishler, E. (1991). Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Pink, S. (2007). Doing visual ethnography: Images, media, and representation in research. Sage.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  21. Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. Doubleday.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Rogoff, B. (2003). The Cultural Nature of Human Development, Oxford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Rogoff, B. and Lave, J. (1984). Everyday cognition: its development in social context. Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Rose, Mike. (2004). The Mind at Work. Viking Adult.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Scott, J. (1999). Seeing like a state. Yale University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Sternberg, R. and Horvath, J. (1999). Tacit knowledge in professional practice: Researcher and practitioner perspectives. Lawrence Erlbaum.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Tenenberg, J. and McCartney, R. (2010). Why discipline matters in computing education scholarship. ACM Transactions on Compututing Educaction 9(4): 18:1--18:7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Tulving, E. (2003). Episodic Memory: From Mind to Brain. Annual Review of Psychology. 53:1--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in Society, Harvard University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Research design: necessary bricolage
          Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ICER '11: Proceedings of the seventh international workshop on Computing education research
            August 2011
            156 pages
            ISBN:9781450308298
            DOI:10.1145/2016911
            • General Chair:
            • Kate Sanders,
            • Program Chairs:
            • Michael E. Caspersen,
            • Alison Clear,
            • Kate Sanders

            Copyright © 2011 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 8 August 2011

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate189of803submissions,24%

            Upcoming Conference

            ICER 2024
            ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research
            August 13 - 15, 2024
            Melbourne , VIC , Australia

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader