skip to main content
10.1145/2513002.2513040acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesieConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper

Towards a MOOC game

Published:30 September 2013Publication History

ABSTRACT

MOOC, or massive online open course, is the current buzzword in online delivery of higher education. They have enjoyed wide positive reception on the perceived benefits of bringing quality education to anyone willing to learn, but potentially lacks engagement and falls short on delivering several traditional graduate attributes known to be important for higher education. This paper presents the position that a MOOC game can alleviate some of these shortcomings and provides a discussion on how it can be achieved.

References

  1. R. Caillois. Man, play, and games. University of Illinois Press, 1961.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. J. Chen. Flow in games (and everything else). Communications of the ACM, 50(4):31, Apr. 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. M. Csikszentmihalyi. Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience (Book). Library Journal, 115(5):105, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. S. Deterding, D. Dixon, R. Khaled, and L. Nacke. From game design elements to gamefulness. In Proceedings MindTrek '11, page 9, New York, New York, USA, Sept. 2011. ACM Press. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. F. Fortune, B. Shifflett, and R. E. Sibley. A comparison of online (high tech) and traditional (high touch) learning in business communication courses in silicon valley. Journal of Education for Business, 81(4):210--214, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. T. Fullerton. Game Design Workshop: A Playcentric Approach to Creating Innovative Games. Elsevier Morgan Kaufmann, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. K. Salen and E. Zimmerman. Rules of Play: Game Design Fundamentals, volume 2004. MIT Press, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. A. Sher. Assessing the relationship of student-instructor and student-student interaction to student learning and satisfaction in Web-based Online Learning Environment. Learning, 8(2):102--120, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. C. T. Tan. MOOCs vs MMOGs. In International Conference on Managing the Asian Century. Springer LNCS, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Towards a MOOC game

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      IE '13: Proceedings of The 9th Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment: Matters of Life and Death
      September 2013
      243 pages
      ISBN:9781450322546
      DOI:10.1145/2513002

      Copyright © 2013 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 30 September 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • short-paper

      Acceptance Rates

      IE '13 Paper Acceptance Rate20of51submissions,39%Overall Acceptance Rate64of148submissions,43%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader