skip to main content
10.1145/3022227.3022241acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesicuimcConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Lecturers' perception on social media networks uses in education

Authors Info & Claims
Published:05 January 2017Publication History

ABSTRACT

Reputation of higher education institutes are significantly affected by the degree of the students' satisfactions. Therefore, considering students opinions about the quality of education is very important in order to maintain the academic institutes' reputation. Thus, the use of social media in the assessment of course quality enhances the education outcomes. Most universities explore their students' views about the quality of the offered courses using online and paper based questionnaires. However, the students' opinions in social media such as Facebook and twitters are not considered in the courses assessment of universities. This paper conduct a study on how university lectures react toward the students views throughout the social media. The contain analysis approach has been used to accomplish this study. The results showed that involving social media in courses assessments strengthen truthfulness of the courses evaluations results.

References

  1. A. Benetoli, T. F. Chen, and P. Aslani, "The use of social media in pharmacy practice and education," Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1--46, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. V. S. Ban, B. Lega, and H. H. Batjer, "Maximizing the potential of social media and social networks in neurosurgery," World neurosurgery, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. L. N. Tobey and M. M. Manore, "Social media and nutrition education: the food hero experience," Journal of nutrition education and behavior, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 128--133, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. P. Dorta-González and M. I. Dorta-González, "Student evaluation of teaching," Proceedings in ARSA-Advanced Research in Scientific Areas, no. 1, 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. N. M. Alotaibi, D. Guha, A. Fallah, A. Aldakkan, F. Nassiri, J. H. Badhiwala, G. M. Ibrahim, M. F. Shamji, R. L. Macdonald, and A. M. Lozano, "Social media metrics and bibliometric profiles of neurosurgical departments and journals: Is there a relationship?" World neurosurgery, 2016.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. W. Sinclair, M. McLoughlin, and T. Warne, "To twitter to woo: Harnessing the power of social media (some) in nurse education to enhance the student's experience," Nurse education in practice, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 507--511, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Y. Cheong Cheng and W. Ming Tam, "Multi-models of quality in education," Quality assurance in Education, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 22--31, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. B. M. Oldfield and S. Baron, "Student perceptions of service quality in a uk university business and management faculty," Quality Assurance in education, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 85--95, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. P. Sultan and H. Yin Wong, "Antecedents and consequences of service quality in a higher education context: a qualitative research approach," Quality assurance in education, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 70--95, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. P. Sultan and H. Yin Wong, "An integrated-process model of service quality, institutional brand and behavioural intentions: The case of a university," Managing Service Quality, vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 487--521, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. C. Abad, J. Taylor, C. Sengul, W. Yurcik, Y. Zhou, and K. Rowe, "Log correlation for intrusion detection: A proof of concept," in Computer Security Applications Conference, 2003. Proceedings. 19th Annual. IEEE, 2003, pp. 255--264. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. A. Parasuraman, V. A. Zeithaml, and L. L. Berry, "A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research," the Journal of Marketing, pp. 41--50, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. S. F. Slater, "Developing a customer value-based theory of the firm," Journal of the Academy of marketing Science, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 162--167, 1997.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. P. Altbach, "Knowledge and education as international commodities," International higher education, no. 28, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. D. S. Fike, D. J. Doyle, and R. J. Connelly, "Online vs. paper evaluations of faculty: When less is just as good." Journal of Effective Teaching, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 42--54, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. C. J. Dommeyer*, P. Baum, R. W. Hanna, and K. S. Chapman, "Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by in-class and online surveys: their effects on response rates and evaluations," assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 611--623, 2004.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. S. L. Annan, S. Tratnack, C. Rubenstein, E. Metzler-Sawin, and L. Hulton, "An integrative review of student evaluations of teaching: Implications for evaluation of nursing faculty," Journal of Professional Nursing, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. e10--e24, 2013.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. K. Alok, "Student evaluation of teaching: An instrument and a development process." International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 226--235, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. T. Beran and C. Violato, "Ratings of university teacher instruction: How much do student and course characteristics really matter?" Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 593--601, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. T. Beran and C. Violato, "Student ratings of teaching effectiveness: Student engagement and course characteristics," The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, vol. 39, no. 1, p. 1, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. N. Ghatasheh, "Knowledge level assessment in e-learning systems using machine learning and user activity analysis," INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 107--113, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. R. Popping, "Analyzing open-ended questions by means of text analysis procedures," Bulletin of Sociological Methodology/Bulletin de Methodologies Sociologies, vol. 128, no. 1, pp. 23--39, 2015.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. H.-F. Hsieh and S. E. Shannon, "Three approaches to qualitative content analysis," Qualitative health research, vol. 15, no. 9, pp. 1277--1288, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Lecturers' perception on social media networks uses in education

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        IMCOM '17: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Information Management and Communication
        January 2017
        746 pages
        ISBN:9781450348881
        DOI:10.1145/3022227

        Copyright © 2017 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 5 January 2017

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        IMCOM '17 Paper Acceptance Rate113of366submissions,31%Overall Acceptance Rate213of621submissions,34%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader