ABSTRACT
The last half decade has witnessed a rapidly accelerating trend toward the application of video display terminal (VDT) technology for information management in the office workplace, and a growing body of scientific and anecdotal data on the implications of VDT use for the well-being of office workers [2,4,6-8,11,15,16]. A striking aspect of the research on this subject is the degree of conflict among reports regarding the type, magnitude, and causes of adverse changes in the health, comfort, and satisfaction of the VDT user, as is apparent in a recent review by Dainoff [5].
Methodological limitations of much of the work to date probably account for some of these inconsistencies. Many of the studies are demonstrations, or pre-experimental or field investigations with control or statistical measures which allow at best, only general and limited inferences regarding the effects of VDT work [4,8,11,16]. A more serious limitation involves the conceptualization or operational definition of VDT use which in turn determines the elements or factors which eventually figure into a VDT stress model or study design. As an operation or job demand, VDT use is clearly not a unidimensional phenomenon. Based upon findings in an investigation of health complaints and job stress surrounding VDT use in newspaper and insurance facilities, Smith, et al. [16] demonstrated that VDTs may present a wide range of organizational as well as physical or environmental job challenges. To date, numerous investigations have focused mainly on the physical ergonomic demands associated with VDT use [7]. A few have placed strong emphasis on job content, psychosocial, and related operational-organizational factors [8,11,16]. None have systematically examined the unique and integrated effects of these two sets of potential stressors. Smith, et al. [16] maintained that in studying the problems of VDT operators, the contributions of both work and workplace design factors and their interactions must be considered. This is the aim of the present study.
- 1.Cakir, A., Hart, D., and Stewart, T. Visual Display Terminals: A Manual Covering Ergonomics, Workplace Design, Health and Safety, Task Organization. New York: John Wiley, 1980. Google ScholarDigital Library
- 2.Cakir, A., Reuter, H.J., Schmude, L., and Ambruster, A. Untersuchungen zur Anpassung von Bildschirmarbeitsplätzen an die Physische und Psychische Funtionweise des Menschen. Bonn, West Germany: Ed. Der Bundesminister für Arbeit und Sozialordnung, P.O.B. D-5300, 1978.Google Scholar
- 3.Caplan, R.D., Cobb, S., French, J.R.P., Van Harrison, R., and Pinneau, S.R., Jr. Job Demands and Worker Health (U.S. DHEW {NIOSH} Publication No. 75-160). Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, 1975.Google Scholar
- 4.Coe, J.B., Cuttle, K., McClellan, W.C., Warden, N.J., and Turner, P.J. Visual display units. Wellington, New Zealand: New Zealand Department of Health, Report N/1/80, 1980.Google Scholar
- 5.Dainoff, M.J. Occupational stress factors in video display terminal operators, a review of empirical research. Cincinnati: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Division of Biomedical and Behavioral Science, 1980.Google Scholar
- 6.Dainoff, M.J., Happ, A., and Crane, P. Visual fatigue and occupational stress in VDT operators. Human Factors, 1981, 23, 421-437.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 7.Grandjean, E., and Vigliani, E. (Eds.). Ergonomic Aspects of Video DisplayTerminals. London: Taylor and Francis, Ltd., 1980.Google Scholar
- 8.Gunnarrson, E., and Östberg, O. The Physical and Psychological Working Environment at a Terminal Based Computer Storage and Retrieval System (Report 35). Stockholm: The Swedish National Board of Occupational Safety and Health, Department of Occupational Medicine, 1977.Google Scholar
- 9.IBM. Human Factors of Workstations with Display Terminals (2nd ed.). (Publication No. 320-6102-1), San Jose, CA: IBM Human Factors Center, 1979.Google Scholar
- 10.Insel, P., and Moos, R. Work Environment Scale-Form S. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, Inc., 1974.Google Scholar
- 11.Johansson, G., and Aronsson, G. Stress reactions in computerized administrative work. Reports from the Department of Psychology, University of Stockholm, 1980, Supp. 50.Google Scholar
- 12.Karasek, R.A., Jr. Job demands, decision latitude, and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1979, 24, 285-311.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 13.Karasek, R.A., Baker, D., Marxer, F., Ahlbom, A., and Theorell, T. Job decision latitude, job demands, and cardiovascular disease: A prospective study of Swedish men. American Journal of Public Health, 1981, 71, 694-705.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 14.McNair, D., Lorr, M., and Droppleman, C. Profile of mood states. San Diego, CA: Education and Industrial Testing Service, 1971.Google Scholar
- 15.Sauter, S. A controlled study of stress and health effects of video display terminal use in news editors. Paper presented at the 109th annual meeting of The American Public Health Association, Los Angeles, November 2, 1981.Google Scholar
- 16.Smith, M.J., Cohen, B.G.F., Stammerjohn, L.W., and Happ, A. An investigation of health complaints and job stress in video display operations. Human Factors, 1981, 23, 387-399.Google ScholarCross Ref
- 17.Southwood, K.E. Substantive theory and statistical interaction: Five models. American Journal of Sociology, 1978, 83, 1154-1203.Google ScholarCross Ref
Index Terms
- A systems analysis of stress-strain in VDT operation
Recommendations
Evaluation of Shoulder Muscular Fatigue Induced during Mouse Operation in a VDT Task
This study was designed to evaluate localized muscular fatigue induced during mouse operation in a VDT task. Ten male undergraduates from 19 to 23 years old participated in the experiment. The subject performed a pointing task with a PC mouse for about ...
Experimental strain field distribution in ankle-foot orthosis (AFO)
BEBI'09: Proceedings of the 2nd WSEAS international conference on Biomedical electronics and biomedical informaticsMedical dictionaries define the ankle-foot orthosis (AFO) as follows: a brace (usually plastic) worn on the lower leg and foot to support the ankle, hold the foot and ankle in the correct position, and correct foot-drop. People, who suffer from a foot-...
Lumbar posture assessment with fabric strain sensors
AbstractAstronauts are at risk for low back pain and injury during extravehicular activity because of the deconditioning of the lumbar region and biomechanical demands associated with wearing a spacesuit. To understand and mitigate injury ...
Comments