skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357263acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Melange: space folding for multi-focus interaction

Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

Interaction and navigation in large geometric spaces typically require a sequence of pan and zoom actions. This strategy is often ineffective and cumbersome, especially when trying to study several distant objects. We propose a new distortion technique that folds the intervening space to guarantee visibility of multiple focus regions. The folds themselves show contextual information and support unfolding and paging interactions. Compared to previous work, our method provides more context and distance awareness. We conducted a study comparing the space-folding technique to existing approaches, and found that participants performed significantly better with the new technique.

References

  1. Caroline Appert and Jean-Daniel Fekete. OrthoZoom scroller: 1D multi-scale navigation. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 21--30, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Patrick Baudisch and Ruth Rosenholtz. Halo: a technique for visualizing off-screen objects. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 481--488, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Frederic Bourgeois and Yves Guiard. Multiscale pointing: facilitating pan-zoom coordination. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM CHI 2002 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 758--759, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Stuart K. Card and David Nation. Degree-of-interest trees: A component of an attention--reactive user interface. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale and Catherine Montagnese. A framework for unifying presentation space. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 61--70, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. George W. Furnas. Generalized fisheye views. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI'86 Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems, pages 16--23, 1986. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. George W. Furnas. A fisheye follow-up: further reflections on focus + context. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 999--1008, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. George W. Furnas and Benjamin B. Bederson. Spacescale diagrams: Understanding multiscale interfaces. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI'95 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 234--241, 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Mohammad Ghoniem, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Philippe Castagliola. On the readability of graphs using node-link and matrix-based representations: a controlled experiment and statistical analysis. Information Visualization, 4(2):114--135, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Sean G. Gustafson and Pourang P. Irani. Comparing visualizations for tracking off-screen moving targets. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM CHI 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 2399--2404, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Christopher G. Healey. Choosing effective colours for data visualization. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Visualization, pages 263--270, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Nathalie Henry and Jean-Daniel Fekete. MatLink: Enhanced matrix visualization for analyzing social networks. In Human-Computer Interaction - INTERACT 2007, volume 4663 of LNCS, pages 288--302, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Takeo Igarashi and Ken Hinckley. Speed-dependent automatic zooming for browsing large documents. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 139--148, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Pourang Irani, Carl Gutwin, and Xing Dong Yang. Improving selection of off-screen targets with hopping. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 299--308, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Bongshin Lee, Catherine Plaisant, Cynthia Sims Parr, Jean-Daniel Fekete, and Nathalie Henry. Task taxonomy for graph visualization. In Proceedings of BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization (BELIV'06), pages 82--86, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Jock D. Mackinlay, George G. Robertson, and Stuart K. Card. The Perspective Wall: Detail and context smoothly integrated. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI'91 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 173--179, 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Tamara Munzner, Franc¸ois Guimbretiere, Serdar Tasiran, Li Zhang, and Yunhong Zhou. TreeJuxtaposer: scalable tree comparison using focus+context with guaranteed visibility. In Proceedings of ACM SIGGRAPH 2003, pages 453--462, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Dmitry Nekrasovski, Adam Bodnar, JoannaMcGrenere, François Guimbretière, and Tamara Munzner. An evaluation of pan & zoom and rubber sheet navigation with and without an overview. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2006 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 11--20, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Ken Perlin and David Fox. Pad: An alternative approach to the computer interface. In Proceedings of Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH 93), pages 57--64, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Catherine Plaisant, David Carr, and Ben Shneiderman. Image browsers: Taxonomy and guidelines for developers. IEEE Software, 12(2):21--32, March 1995. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Catherine Plaisant, Jesse Grosjean, and Benjamin B. Bederson. SpaceTree: Supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pages 57--64, 2002. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Catherine Plaisant, Brett Milash, Anne Rose, Seth Widoff, and Ben Shneiderman. LifeLines: Visualizing personal histories. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI'96 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 221--227, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Ramana Rao and Stuart K. Card. The Table Lens: Merging graphical and symbolic representations in an interactive focus+context visualization for tabular information. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI'94 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 318--322, 1994. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. George G. Robertson and Jock D. Mackinlay. The Document Lens. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 101--108, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Manojit Sarkar, Scott S. Snibbe, Oren J. Tversky, and Steven P. Reiss. Stretching the rubber sheet: A metaphor for visualizing large layouts on small screens. In Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, pages 81--91, 1993. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Garth Shoemaker and Carl Gutwin. Supporting multipoint interaction in visual workspaces. In Proceedings of the ACM CHI 2007 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 999--1008, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. James Slack, Kristian Hildebrand, and Tamara Munzner. PRISAD: A partitioned rendering infrastructure for scalable accordion drawing (extended version). Information Visualization, 5(2):137--151, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jarke J. van Wijk and Wim A. A. Nuij. Smooth and efficient zooming and panning. In Proceedings of the IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pages 15--22, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Polle T. Zellweger, Jock D. Mackinlay, Lance Good, Mark Stefik, and Patrick Baudisch. City lights: contextual views in minimal space. In Extended Abstracts of the ACM CHI 2003 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 838--839, 2003. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Melange: space folding for multi-focus interaction

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Conferences
          CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
          April 2008
          1870 pages
          ISBN:9781605580111
          DOI:10.1145/1357054

          Copyright © 2008 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 6 April 2008

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader