skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518932acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Auditory icon and earcon mobile service notifications: intuitiveness, learnability, memorability and preference

Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

With an ever increasing number of mobile services, meaningful audio notifications could effectively inform users of the incoming services while minimising undesired and intrusive interruptions. Therefore, careful design of mobile service notification is needed. In this paper we evaluate two types of audio (auditory icons and earcons) as mobile service notifications, by comparing them on 4 measures: intuitiveness, learnability, memorability and user preference. A 4-stage longitudinal evaluation involving two lab experiments, a field study and a web-based experiment indicated that auditory icons performed significantly better in all measures. Implications for mobile audio notification design are presented.

References

  1. Baber, C. and Noyes, J.M., Eds. (1993). Interactive Speech Technology: Human Factors Issues in the Application of Speech Input/Output to Computers. Taylor&Francis, Inc. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Blattner, M.M., Sumikawa, D.A. and Greenberg, R.M. (1989). Earcons and Icons: Their Structure and Common Design Principles. SIGCHI Bull. 21(1), pp. 123--124. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Block Jr F.E., Nuutinen L. and Ballast B., (1999). Optimization of Alarms: A Study on Alarm Limits, Alarm Sounds, and False Alarms, Intended to Reduce Annoyance. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 15(2), pp. 75--83.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bonebright, T.L., and Nees, M.A. (2007). Memory for Auditory Icons and Earcons with Localization Cues. In Proc. ICAD 2007, pp. 419--422.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Brewster, S.A. (1998). Using Non-speech Sounds to Provide Navigation Cues. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 5(2), pp. 224--259. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Brewster, S.A., Raty, V.P., and Kortekangas, A. (1996). Earcons as a Method of Providing Navigational Cues in a Menu Hierarchy. In Proc. BCS HCI'96, pp. 169--183. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Brewster, S.A., Wright, P.C. and Edwards, A.D.N. (1993). An Evaluation of Earcons for use in Auditory Human-Computer Interfaces. In Proc. CHI'93, pp. 222--227. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Bussemakers, M.P., and De Haan, A. (2000). When it Sounds Like a Duck and it Looks Like a Dog .. Auditory icons vs. earcons in multimedia environments. In Proc. ICAD 2000, pp. 184--189.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Cohen, J. (1994). Monitoring Background Activities. In G. Kramer (Ed.), Auditory Display: Sonification, Audification and Auditory interfaces, pp. 499--522.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Edworthy, J. and Hards, R. (1999). Learning Auditory Warnings: The Effects of Sound Type, Verbal Labelling and Imagery on the Identification of Alarm Sounds. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 24(6), pp. 603--618.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Garzonis, S., Bevan, C. and O'Neill, E. (2008). Mobile Service Audio Notifications: intuitive semantics and noises. In Proc. OZCHI'08, pp. 156--163. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Gaver, W.W. (1997). Auditory Interfaces. Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction, Elsevier Science.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Gaver, W.W. (1989). The SonicFinder: An Interface That Uses Auditory Icons. In Human-Computer Interaction, 4(1), pp. 67--94. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Gaver, W.W. (1986). Auditory Icons: Using Sound in Computer Interfaces. In Human-Computer Interaction, 2(2), pp. 167--177. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Graham, R. (1999). Use of Auditory Icons as Emergency Warnings: Evaluation within a Vehicle Collision Avoidance Application.Ergonomics, 42(9), pp. 1233--1248.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Hickling, E. M. (1994). Ergonomics and Engineering Aspects of Designing an Alarm System for a Modern Nuclear Power Plant. In Human Factors in Alarm Design, N. Stanton, Ed. Taylor&Francis, pp. 165--178. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Hoggan, E. and Brewster, S.A. (2007). Designing Audio and Tactile Crossmodal Icons for Mobile Devices. In Proc. ICMI'07, ACM Press, pp. 162--169. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Isaacs, E., Walendowski, A. and Ranganathan, D. (2002). Hubbub: A Sound-Enhanced Mobile Instant Messenger that Supports Awareness and Opportunistic Interactions. In Proc. CHI, pp. 179--186. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Keller, P. and Stevens, C. (2004). Meaning from Environmental Sounds: Types of Signal-Referent Relations and their Effect on Recognizing Auditory Icons. Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied, 10(1), pp. 3--12.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Leplatre, G. and Brewster, S.A. (2000). Designing non-speech sounds to support navigation in mobile phone menus. In Proc. ICAD'00, pp. 190--199.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Leung, Y. K., Smith, S., Parker, S., and Martin, R. (1997). Learning and Retention of Auditory Warnings. In Proc. ICAD'97, pp. 288--299.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. McGee-Lennon, M., Wolters M. and McBryan, T. (2007). Audio Reminders in the Home Environment. In Proc ICAD'07, pp. 437--444.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Patterson, R.D. and Mayfield, T.F. (1990). Auditory Warning Sounds in the Work Environment {and Discussion}. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, Vol. 327(1241), Human Factors in Hazardous Situations, pp. 485--492.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Sanderson, P., Wee, A., Seah, E. and Lacherez, P., (2006). Auditory Alarms, Medical Standards, and Urgency. In Proc. ICAD'06, pp. 24--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Sikora, C.A., Roberts, L. and Murray, L. (1995). Musical vs. Real World Feedback Signals, In Proc. CHI'95, pp. 220--221. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ulfvengren, P. (2003). Design of Natural Warning Sounds in Human-Machine Systems. PhD thesis, Stockholm, Sweden 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Walker, B. N. and Kramer, G. (2005). Mappings and Metaphors in Auditory Displays: An Experimental Assessment. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 2(4), pp. 407--412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Auditory icon and earcon mobile service notifications: intuitiveness, learnability, memorability and preference

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in
      • Published in

        cover image ACM Conferences
        CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
        April 2009
        2426 pages
        ISBN:9781605582467
        DOI:10.1145/1518701

        Copyright © 2009 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 4 April 2009

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article

        Acceptance Rates

        CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader