skip to main content
10.1145/1731903.1731939acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesissConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table

Published:23 November 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

The potential of tabletops to enable groups of people to simultaneously touch and manipulate a shared tabletop interface provides new possibilities for supporting collaborative learning. However, findings from the few studies carried out to date have tended to show small or insignificant effects compared with other technologies. We present the Collaborative Learning Mechanisms framework used to examine the coupling of verbal interactions and physical actions in collaboration around the tabletop and reveal subtle mechanisms at play. Analysis in this way revealed that what might be considered undesirable or harmful interactions and intrusions in general collaborative settings, might be beneficial for collaborative learning. We discuss the implications of these findings for how tabletops may be used to support children's collaboration, and the value of considering verbal and physical aspects of interaction together in this way.

References

  1. Barbieri, M. S. and Light, P. Interaction, gender and performance on a computer-based problem solving task. Learning and instruction 2, (1992), 199--213.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Benford, S., Bederson, B. B., Akesson, K., Bayon, V., Druin, A., Hansson, P., Hourcade, J. P., Ingram, R., Neale, H., O'Malley, C., Simsarian, K. T., Stanton, D., Sundblad, Y., and Taxen, G. Designing storytelling technologies to encouraging collaboration between young children. Proc. CHI 2000, ACM (2000), 556--563. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Block, F., Gutwin, C., Haller, M., Gellersen, H., and Billinghurst, M. Pen and paper techniques for physical customisation of tabletop interfaces. In Proc. TABLETOP 2008, IEEE (2008), 17--24.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Cappelletti, A., Gelmini, G., Pianesi, F., Rossi, F., and Zancanaro, M. Enforcing cooperative storytelling: first studies. In Proc. ICALT2004, IEEE Computer Society (2004), 281--285. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Dillenbourg, P., What do you mean by 'collaborative learning'?, in Collaborative learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, P. Dillenbourg, Editor. 1999, Elsevier: Oxford. p. 1--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Do-Lenh, S., Kaplan, F., and Dillenbourg, P. Paper-based concept map: the effects of tabletop on an expressive collaborative learning task. In Proc. HCI 2009, ACM (2009) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Harris, A., Rick, J., Bonnett, V. J., Yuill, N., Fleck, R., Marshall, P., and Rogers, Y. Around the table: Are multiple-touch surfaces better than single-touch for children's collaborative interactions. In Proc. CSCL09, (2009), 335--344. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Hornecker, E. A Design Theme for Tangible Interaction: Embodied Facilitation. In ECSCW 2005, Kluwer Academic Publishers (2005), 23--43. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Kruger, A. C. Gender, group composition and peer interaction in computer-based co-operative learning. Social Development 2 (1993), 165--182.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Marshall, P., Fleck, R., Harris, A., Rick, J., Hornecker, E., Rogers, Y., Yuill, N., and Dalton, N. S. Fighting for control: children's embodied interactions when using physical and digital representations. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM (2009), 2149--2152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Mercer, N. and Wegerif, R., Is 'exploratory talk' productive talk?, in Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction, K. Littleton and P. Light, Editors. 1998, Routledge: London. p. 79--101. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Pinelle, D., Barjawi, M., Nacenta, M., and Mandryk, R. An evaluation of coordination techniques for protecting objects and territories in tabletop groupware. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM (2009), 2129--2138. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Pinelle, D., Gutwin, C., and Greenberg, S. Task analysis for groupware usability evaluation: Modelling shared-workspace tasks with the mechanics of collaboration. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 10, 4 (2003), 281--311. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Piper, A. M. and Hollan, J. D. Tabletop displays for small group study: affordances of paper and digital materials. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM (2009), 1227--1236. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Piper, A. M., O'Brien, E., Morris, M. R., and Winograd, T. SIDES: a cooperative tabletop computer game for social skills development. In Proc. CSCW 2006, ACM (2006), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Rick, J., Harris, A., Marshall, P., Fleck, R., Yuill, N., and Rogers, Y. Children designing together on a multi-touch tabletop: An analysis of spatial orientation and user interactions. In Proc. IDC '09, (2009), 106--114. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rogers, Y., Lim, Y., Hazelwood, W., and Marshall, P. Equal Opportunities: Do shareable interfaces promote more group participation than single user displays? Human-Computer Interaction 24, 2 (2009), 79--116.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Roschelle, J. and Teasley, S. D., The construction of shared knowled in collaborative problem solving, in Computer supported collaborative learning, C. O'Malley, Editor. 1995, Springer: Berlin. p. 69--97.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tang, A., Tory, M., Po, B., Neumann, P., and Carpendale, S. Collaborative coupling over tabletop displays. In Proc. CHI 2006, ACM (2006), 1181--1190. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Teasley, S. D. and Roschelle, J., Constructing a joint problem space: the computer as a tool for sharing knowledge, in Computers as cognitive tools, S. P. Lajoie and S. J. Derry, Editors. 1993, Erlbaum: Hillsdale p. 229--258.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Tse, E., Greenberg, S., Shen, C., and Forlines, C. Multimodal multiplayer tabletop gaming. Comput. Entertain. 5, 2 (2007), 12. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Underwood, J. and Underwood, G., Task effects on co-operative and collaborative learning with computers, in Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction, K. Littleton and P. Light, Editors. 1998, Routledge: London. p. 10--23. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Weiss, M., Wagner, J., Jansen, Y., Jennings, R., Khoshabeh, R., Hollan, J. D., and Borchers, J. SLAP widgets: bridging the gap between virtual and physical controls on tabletops. In Proc. CHI 2009, ACM (2009), 481--490 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Actions speak loudly with words: unpacking collaboration around the table

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            ITS '09: Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Interactive Tabletops and Surfaces
            November 2009
            240 pages
            ISBN:9781605587332
            DOI:10.1145/1731903

            Copyright © 2009 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 23 November 2009

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate119of418submissions,28%

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader