skip to main content
article
Free Access

Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers

Published:02 January 1994Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1 Bannob. L.J. and Schunidt, K. CSCW, four characters in search of a context In Studies in Computer-Supported Cooperative work, J.M. Bjowers and S.D. Benford Eds., NOrth-Holland, Anisterdam, 1991. pp. 3-16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. 2 Bullen, C.V. nad Bennett, J.L., Learning from user expericnce witjhn goupware. In Proceedings of CSCW '90 (lOS Angeles, Calif., Oct. 7-10. 1990. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. 3 Carasik, R.P. and Grantham, C.E., A case study of computer-supported cooperative work in a dispersed orga nization. In Proceedigns of CHI '88 (Washingrton D.C. may 15-19. 1988). pp. 61-66. Some specific details were given only in the verbal presentation. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. 4 Coben, M.D. March, J.G. and Olsen, J.P. A garbage can model of organizational choice. Admin. Sci. Q 17 (1972). 1-25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Commun. ACM 34.12 Perin.C., Electronic Social rields in Bureacra cies. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. 6 Curtis, B., Krasner. H. and Iscoe, N A field study of the software design process for large systems. Commun ACM 31, 11 (1988), 1268-1287. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. 7 Ehn, P. Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1989. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. 8 Ehrilich, S.F. Strategies for encourag. ing successful adoption of office communication systems. ACM Trans. Off Inf. Sys. 5 (1987). 340-357. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. 9 Ensor, R. Muderator. How can we make groupware practical? In Pro ceedings of CHI '90 (Seattle, Wash, Apr, 1-5, 1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. 10 Eveland. J.D. and Bikson, T.K. Evolving electronic communcation networks: An empirical assessment. Off Tech people 3 (1987), 103-128. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. 11 Greenbaum, J. and Kyng. m. Design at work: Cooperative design of Compute Systems. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1991. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. 12 Grudin, J. Interactive systems: Bridging the gaps between developers and users. IEEE Comput. 24, 4 (1991), 59-69. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. 13 Grudin, J. Obstacles to user involement in software product development, with implications for CSCW. Int. J. Man-Machine Studies, 34, 3 (1991), 435-452. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. 14 Grudin. j. interface: An evolving concept. Commun, ACM 36, 4 (1993). 110-119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. 15 Ishii, H. and Ohkubo, M. Message-driven groupware design based on an office procedure model, OM-1. J. Inf. Process. 14, 2 (1990), 184-191. Inf. Process. 14. 2 (1990). 184-191. Information Processing Society of Japan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 Kling, R. Social analyses of computing: Theoretical prespectives in recent emprical research. ACM Comput Surv, 12, 1 (1980), 61-110. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. 17 Kraemer, K. and King, J.Computerbased systems for cooperative work and group decision making. ACM Comput. Surv. 20, (1988), 115-146. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. 18 Lucas, H.C., Why Information systems fail. Columbia University. New York, 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 Lyytinen, K. and Lehtinen, E. Seven mortal sins of systems work. In system design for human decelopment and Pra ductivity: Partivipation and Beyond, P. Docherty, K. Fuchs- Kittowski, P. Kolm, and I. Mathiassen Eds., North-Holland. Smsterdam, 1987. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. 20 Malone, T.W. and Lai, K.-Y. Toward intelligent tools for information sharing and collabotation. In Computer Augmented Teamwork: a Guided Tour. R.P. Bostrom, R.T. Watson and S.T. Kinney, Eds. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York, 1992. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 Markus, K.L. and connolly, T. Why CSCW applications fail: Problems in the adoption of interdependent work tools, In proceedings of CSCW '90 (Los Angeles, Calif., Oct. 7-10. 1990). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. 22 Mccracken, D.L. and Akseyn, R.M. Experience with the ZOG humancomputer interface system. Int. J Man-Machine studies 21 (1984), 293- 310. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. 23 Olson, M.H. and Lucas, H.C., Jr., The impact of office automation on the organization: Some implecations for research and practice. Commun. ACM 25.(1982). 838-847. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. 24 Pfeffer, J. Organizations and organization theory. In Handbook of Social Psychology, G. Lindzey and E. Aronson, Eds., Randon House, New York, 1985.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25 Rice, R.E.Computer-mediated con munication systems network data: Theoretical comncerns and empirical examples. Int. J. man-Machine studies, 32 (1990), 627-647. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. 26 Rowe, c.j. Introducing a sales order munication systems network data: Theoretical concerns and empirical examples. Int. J. Man-Machine studies, 32 (1990), 627-647. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. 27 Sathi. A., Morton, R.E. and roth S.F. Callisto: An Intelligent project management suystem. In Comp{utersupported cooperative work: Abook of readings. I. Greif, Ed., Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo, Calif., 269-309. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. 28 Schuler, D. and Namioka, A., Eds., 1993. Participatory Design: Principles and Practices. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1993. Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29 Sproull, L. Using electronic mail for data collection in organizational research. Acad. Manage. J. 29, 1 (1986), 159-169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30 Suchman, l. Office procedures as practical action: Models of work and system design. ACM Trans. Off. Inf. Syst. I (1983), 320-328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Communications of the ACM
          Communications of the ACM  Volume 37, Issue 1
          Jan. 1994
          95 pages
          ISSN:0001-0782
          EISSN:1557-7317
          DOI:10.1145/175222
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1994 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 2 January 1994

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader