skip to main content
10.1145/3196709.3196743acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Reconfiguring the Appearance and Expression of Social Robots by Acknowledging their Otherness

Published:08 June 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

The design of social robots usually does not focus on their kinetic expression, and often follows the assumption that their appearance should be human or animal like. To encourage a broader understanding of the possibilities for design of social robots, and as an inquiry into alternative relations with them, we present two robots, the Lat-Sac and the Blo-Nut, which are purposefully moving away from typical social robot design. We present how we engaged performance experts in the choreographic sketching of their elastic expression, and how we staged the robots in a fictitious near-future scenario to create a discursive space for reflection on emerging relations. Based on these encounters we discuss how acknowledging the otherness of social robots can be valuable in designing as well as growing intriguing relations with them.

References

  1. Albert van Breemen, Xue Yan, and Bernt Meerbeek. 2005. iCat: an animated user-interface robot with personality. In Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 143--144. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Auger, James. "Speculative design: crafting the speculation." Digital Creativity 24.1 (2013): 11--35.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bartneck, Christoph, et al. "Does the design of a robot influence its animacy and perceived intelligence?" International Journal of Social Robotics 1.2 (2009): 195--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Bewley, Harvey, & Boer, Laurens. (2018) Designing Blo-nut: a Soft Robot Demonstrating The Potential of Otherness in Behavioural Artefacts. In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Designing Interactive Systems. ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bewley, Harvey, & Anna Vallgårda. (2017). Provoking Performing Objects: Expanding the Design Space for Soft Robotics. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 243--248). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Boer, Laurens, and Jared Donovan. "Provotypes for participatory innovation." Proceedings of the designing interactive systems conference. ACM, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Breazeal, Cynthia. "Toward sociable robots." Robotics and autonomous systems 42.3 (2003): 167--175.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Bretan, Mason, Guy Hoffman, and Gil Weinberg. "Emotionally expressive dynamic physical behaviors in robots." International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 78 (2015): 1--16. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Candy, Stuart. "The futures of everyday life: politics and the design of experiential scenarios." Doctorat de philosophie en sciences politiques, Université d'Hawaï à Manoa (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Coeckelbergh, Mark. "Humans, animals, and robots: A phenomenological approach to human-robot relations." International Journal of Social Robotics 3.2 (2011): 197--204.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. DiSalvo, Carl. Adversarial design. The MIT Press, 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Djajadiningrat, Tom, Ben Matthews, and Marcelle Stienstra. "Easy doesn't do it: skill and expression in tangible aesthetics." Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 11.8 (2007): 657--676. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dunne, Anthony, and Fiona Raby. Speculative everything: design, fiction, and social dreaming. MIT Press, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Ferrari, Francesco, Maria Paola Paladino, and Jolanda Jetten. "Blurring human--machine distinctions: anthropomorphic appearance in social robots as a threat to human distinctiveness." International Journal of Social Robotics 8.2 (2016): 287--302.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Fink, Julia. "Anthropomorphism and human likeness in the design of robots and human-robot interaction." International Conference on Social Robotics. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2012.? Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Gibson, James J. The ecological approach to visual perception: classic edition. Psychology Press, 2014.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Gouldner, Alvin W. "The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement." American sociological review (1960): 161--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Hassenzahl, Marc, Sarah Diefenbach, and Anja Göritz. "Needs, affect, and interactive products--Facets of user experience." Interacting with computers 22.5 (2010): 353--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Helmes, J., Taylor, A. S., Cao, X., Höök, K., Schmitt, P., & Villar, N. (2011, January). Rudiments 1, 2 & 3: design speculations on autonomy. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Tangible, embedded, and embodied interaction (pp. 145--152). ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Hoffman, Guy, and Wendy Ju. "Designing robots with movement in mind." Journal of Human-Robot Interaction 3.1 (2014): 89--122. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ihde, Don. Technology and the lifeworld: From garden to earth. Indiana University Press, 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Jensen, J. Vernon. "Communicative functions of silence." ETC: A Review of General Semantics (1973): 249--257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Koskinen, Ilpo, et al. Design research through practice: From the lab, field, and showroom. Elsevier, 2011.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Levinas, Emmanuel. Totality and infinity: An essay on exteriority. Vol. 1. Springer Science & Business Media, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Lindley, Joseph, and Paul Coulton. "Back to the future: 10 years of design fiction." Proceedings of the 2015 British HCI Conference. ACM, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Markussen, Thomas, and Eva Knutz. "The poetics of design fiction." Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces. ACM, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Mori, Masahiro (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7:33--35Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Peters John Durham (1999) Speaking into the air: a history of the idea of communication. University of Chicago Press, Chicago?Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Pinchevski, A. (2005) By way of interruption: Levinas and the ethics of communication. Dusquene University Press, Pittsburgh?Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Ross, Philip, and Stephan Wensveen. "Designing behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design." International Journal of Design 4.2 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Saldien, Jelle, et al. "Expressing emotions with the social robot Probo." International Journal of Social Robotics 2.4 (2010): 377--389.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Sandry, Eleanor. "Re-evaluating the form and communication of social robots." International Journal of Social Robotics 7.3 (2015): 335--346.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Sandry, Eleanor. Robots and communication. Springer, 2015. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Sparrow, Robert. "The march of the robot dogs." Ethics and information Technology 4.4 (2002): 305--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Stiehl, Walter Dan, et al. "The huggable: a therapeutic robotic companion for relational, affective touch." ACM SIGGRAPH 2006 emerging technologies. ACM, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  36. Suchman, Lucy. Human-machine reconfigurations: Plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  37. Turkle, Sherry. "The second self: Computers and the human spirit." (1984): 36--45. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Verbeek, Peter Paul (2006). Materializing morality. Design ethics and technological mediation. 31(3), 361380.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Reconfiguring the Appearance and Expression of Social Robots by Acknowledging their Otherness

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      DIS '18: Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      June 2018
      1418 pages
      ISBN:9781450351980
      DOI:10.1145/3196709

      Copyright © 2018 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 8 June 2018

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      DIS '18 Paper Acceptance Rate107of487submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

      Upcoming Conference

      DIS '24
      Designing Interactive Systems Conference
      July 1 - 5, 2024
      IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader