skip to main content
10.1145/3209281.3209378acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication Pagesdg-oConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Enhancing situation awareness of public safety events by visualizing topic evolution using social media

Published:30 May 2018Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social media contributes to enhancing transparency and openness for the purpose of innovating public services and policy-making. In disaster management, social media data can be mined to discover public perceptions and concerns on large disaster events. However, converting large data streams into useful information remains a challenge due to the unstructured nature of textual data. This study proposes an interactive topic modeling method to analyze microblog data for understanding the dynamics of public expressions immediately after a major explosion event. First, we extract topics from microblog message data. In order to test the influence of the number of topics, the topics are detected at multiple levels of granularity by varying the number of topics. Second, these topics are used to detect topical compositions of contents at different time slices and assess the topic evolution over time. The topic evolution patterns are visualized by the streamgraph method to discover informative topics to help to take further actions. Third, since the first-level topics are not informative, we conduct a second-level topic (subtopic) analysis to detect key decision elements by choosing "investigation" from the first-level topics, a hot focus in any man-made disaster. The results improve our understanding of the topic composition evolution around major man-made disasters and have implications on officials deciding what and when to release formal investigation information to the public.

References

  1. Farzindar Atefeh and Wael Khreich. 2015. A survey of techniques for event detection in twitter. Computational Intelligence 31, 1 (2015), 132--164. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Hila Becker, Mor Naaman, and Luis Gravano. 2011. Beyond Trending Topics: Real-World Event Identification on Twitter. ICWSM 11, 2011 (2011), 438--441.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Nicolas Garcia Belmonte. 2014. Extracting and visualizing insights from realtime conversations around public presentations. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2014 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 225--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. David M Blei. 2012. Probabilistic topic models. Commun. ACM 55, 4 (2012), 77--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. David M Blei, Andrew Y Ng, and Michael I Jordan. 2003. Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of machine Learning research 3, Jan (2003), 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Louis Capozzi. 2013. Crisis management in the Age of Social Media. Business Expert Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cornelia Caragea, Nathan McNeese, Anuj Jaiswal, Greg Traylor, Hyun-Woo Kim, Prasenjit Mitra, Dinghao Wu, Andrea H Tapia, Lee Giles, Bernard J Jansen, and others. 2011. Classifying text messages for the Haiti earthquake. In Proceedings of the 8th international conference on information systems for crisis response and management (ISCRAM2011). Citeseer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Junghoon Chae, Dennis Thom, Harald Bosch, Yun Jang, Ross Maciejewski, David S Ebert, and Thomas Ertl. 2012. Spatiotemporal social media analytics for abnormal event detection and examination using seasonal-trend decomposition. In Visual Analytics Science and Technology (VAST), 2012 IEEE Conference on. IEEE, 143--152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Yuzhong Chen, Wanhua Li, Wenzhong Guo, and Kun Guo. 2015. Popular Topic Detection in Chinese Micro-Blog Based on the Modified LDA Model. In Web Information System and Application Conference (WISA), 2015 12th. IEEE, 37--42. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Dmitry Chernov and Didier Sornette. 2016. Causes of Risk Information Concealment. In Man-made Catastrophes and Risk Information Concealment: Case Studies of Major Disasters and Human Fallibility, Dmitry Chernov and Didier Sornette (Eds.). Springer, Zürich, Switzerland.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Louise K Comfort, Jennifer Bert, and Jee Eun Song. 2016. Wicked problems in real time: uncertainty, information, and the escalation of Ebola. Information polity 21, 3 (2016), 273--289.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kate Crawford and Megan Finn. 2015. The limits of crisis data: analytical and ethical challenges of using social and mobile data to understand disasters. GeoJournal 80, 4 (2015), 491--502.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Weiwei Cui, Shixia Liu, Li Tan, Conglei Shi, Yangqiu Song, Zekai Gao, Huamin Qu, and Xin Tong. 2011. Textflow: Towards better understanding of evolving topics in text. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 17, 12 (2011), 2412--2421. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Carmen De Maio, Giuseppe Fenza, Vincenzo Loia, and Francesco Orciuoli. 2017. Unfolding social content evolution along time and semantics. Future Generation Computer Systems 66 (2017), 146--159.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Qing Deng, Yi Liu, Hui Zhang, Xiaolong Deng, and Yefeng Ma. 2016. A new crowdsourcing model to assess disaster using microblog data in typhoon Haiyan. Natural Hazards 84, 2 (2016), 1241--1256.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Xian Gao and Jooho Lee. 2017. E-government services and social media adoption: Experience of small local governments in Nebraska state. Government Information Quarterly 34, 4 (2017), 627--634.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  17. Jennifer Golbeck, Justin M Grimes, and Anthony Rogers. 2010. Twitter use by the US Congress. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 61, 8 (2010), 1612--1621. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Alaa Abi Haidar, Bin Yang, and Jean-Gabriel Ganascia. 2016. Visualizing the First World War Using StreamGraphs and Information Extraction. In Information Visualisation (IV), 2016 20th International Conference. IEEE, 290--293.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Haijing Hao and Kunpeng Zhang. 2016. The voice of chinese health consumers: a text mining approach to web-Based physician reviews. Journal of medical Internet research 18, 5 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Enamul Hoque and Giuseppe Carenini. 2016. Interactive topic modeling for exploring asynchronous online conversations: Design and evaluation of ConVisIT. ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) 6, 1 (2016), 7. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ping Huang and Jingyuan Zhang. 2015. Facts related to August 12, 2015 explosion accident in Tianjin, China. Process Safety Progress 34, 4 (2015), 313--314.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Wei Huang and Songnian Li. 2016. Understanding human activity patterns based on space-time-semantics. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 121 (2016), 1--10.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Alan Jackoway, Hanan Samet, and Jagan Sankaranarayanan. 2011. Identification of live news events using Twitter. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on Location-Based Social Networks. ACM, 25--32. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Tomasz Janowski. 2015. Digital government evolution: From transformation to contextualization. (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Krishna Y Kamath and James Caverlee. 2011. Discovering trending phrases on information streams. In Proceedings of the 20th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management. ACM, 2245--2248. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Andrea L Kavanaugh, Edward A Fox, Steven D Sheetz, Seungwon Yang, Lin Tzy Li, Donald J Shoemaker, Apostol Natsev, and Lexing Xie. 2012. Social media use by government: From the routine to the critical. Government Information Quarterly 29, 4 (2012), 480--491.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Dongwoo Kim and Alice Oh. 2011. Topic chains for understanding a news corpus. Computational Linguistics and Intelligent Text Processing (2011), 163--176. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Jae Won Kim, Dongwoo Kim, Brian Keegan, Joon Hee Kim, Suin Kim, and Alice Oh. 2015. Social media dynamics of global co-presence during the 2014 FIFA World Cup. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2623--2632. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Dennis Linders. 2012. From e-government to we-government: Defining a typology for citizen coproduction in the age of social media. Government Information Quarterly 29, 4 (2012), 446--454.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Shuhua Monica Liu. 2016. Chinese Netizens' Collective Deliberation on Bystander Controversies and the Role of Micro-blogging. In Proceedings of the 17th International Digital Government Research Conference on Digital Government Research. ACM, 425--434. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. B De Longueville, Gianluca Luraschi, Paul Smits, S Peedell, and T De Groeve. 2010. Citizens as sensors for natural hazards: A VGI integration worklow. Geomatica 64, 1 (2010), 41--59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Lianjie Ma, Jongpil Chung, and Stuart Thorson. 2005. E-government in China: Bringing economic development through administrative reform. Government Information Quarterly 22, 1 (2005), 20--37.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Yefeng Ma, Qing Deng, Xinzhi Wang, Jiaqi Liu, and Hui Zhang. 2014. Keyword-Based Semantic Analysis of Microblog for Public Opinion Study in Online Collective Behaviors. In International Conference on Web-Age Information Management. Springer, 44--55.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Mahshid Marbouti, Irene Mayor, Dianna Yim, and Frank Maurer. 2013. Social Media Analyst Responding Tool: A Visual Analytics Prototype to Identify Relevant Tweets in Emergency Events. (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. David F Merrick and Tom Duffy. 2013. Utilizing community volunteered information to enhance disaster situational awareness.. In ISCRAM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Stuart E Middleton, Lee Middleton, and Stefano Modafferi. 2014. Real-time crisis mapping of natural disasters using social media. IEEE Intelligent Systems 29, 2 (2014), 9--17.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Robertus Nugroho, Diego Molla-Aliod, Jian Yang, Youliang Zhong, Cecile Paris, and Surya Nepal. 2015. Incorporating tweet relationships into topic derivation. In International Conference of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics. Springer, 177--190.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Robertus Nugroho, Weiliang Zhao, Jian Yang, Cecile Paris, and Surya Nepal. 2017. Using time-sensitive interactions to improve topic derivation in twitter. World Wide Web 20, 1 (2017), 61--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Alexander Pak and Patrick Paroubek. 2010. Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining.. In LREc, Vol. 10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Panos Panagiotopoulos, Frances Bowen, and Phillip Brooker. 2017. The value of social media data: Integrating crowd capabilities in evidence-based policy. Government Information Quarterly 34, 4 (2017), 601--612.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  41. Kuei-Hsiang Peng, Li-Heng Liou, Cheng-Shang Chang, and Duan-Shin Lee. 2015. Predicting personality traits of Chinese users based on Facebook wall posts. In Wireless and Optical Communication Conference (WOCC), 2015 24th. IEEE, 9--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  42. Yan Qu, Chen Huang, Pengyi Zhang, and Jun Zhang. 2011. Microblogging after a major disaster in China: a case study of the 2010 Yushu earthquake. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM, 25--34. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Bernd Resch, Florian Usländer, and Clemens Havas. 2017. Combining machine-learning topic models and spatiotemporal analysis of social media data for disaster footprint and damage assessment. Cartography and Geographic Information Science (2017), 1--15.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Michael Röder, Andreas Both, and Alexander Hinneburg. 2015. Exploring the space of topic coherence measures. In Proceedings of the eighth ACM international conference on Web search and data mining. ACM, 399--408. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Tatsuhiro Sakai, Keiichi Tamura, and Hajime Kitakami. 2015. Extracting Topic-Related Photos in Density-Based Spatiotemporal Analysis System for Enhancing Situation Awareness. In Advanced Applied Informatics (IIAI-AAI), 2015 IIAI 4th International Congress on. IEEE, 201--206. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Yongzhong Sha, Jinsong Yan, and Guoray Cai. 2014. Detecting public sentiment over PM2. 5 pollution hazards through analysis of Chinese microblog.. In ISCRAM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Nabila Shahid, Muhammad Ilyas, Jalal Alowibdi, and Naif Aljohani. 2017. Word-cloud Segmentation for Simplified Exploration of Trending Topics on Twitter. IET Software (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Enrico Steiger, JoÃo Porto Albuquerque, and Alexander Zipf. 2015. An advanced systematic literature review on spatiotemporal analyses of Twitter data. Transactions in GIS 19, 6 (2015), 809--834.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  49. Enrico Steiger, René Westerholt, Bernd Resch, and Alexander Zipf. 2015. Twitter as an indicator for whereabouts of people? Correlating Twitter with UK census data. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 54 (2015), 255--265.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. J Sun. 2012. 'Jieba' Chinese word segmentation tool. (2012).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Dennis Thom, Robert Krüger, and Thomas Ertl. 2016. Can Twitter save lives? A broad-scale study on visual social media analytics for public safety. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 22, 7 (2016), 1816--1829.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. Stephen Wan and Cécile Paris. 2014. Improving government services with social media feedback. In Proceedings of the 19th international conference on Intelligent User Interfaces. ACM, 27--36. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  53. Yandong Wang, Teng Wang, Xinyue Ye, Jianqi Zhu, and Jay Lee. 2015. Using social media for emergency response and urban sustainability: A case study of the 2012 Beijing rainstorm. Sustainability 8, 1 (2015), 25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Zheye Wang and Xinyue Ye. 2018. Social media analytics for natural disaster management. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 32, 1 (2018), 49--72. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  55. Yingcai Wu, Nan Cao, David Gotz, Yap-Peng Tan, and Daniel A Keim. 2016. A survey on visual analytics of social media data. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 18, 11 (2016), 2135--2148. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  56. Qianli Yuan and Mila Gasco. 2017. Citizens' Use of Microblogging During Emergency: A Case Study on Water Contamination in Shanghai. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research. ACM, 110--119. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  57. Lizhou Zheng, Peiquan Jin, Jie Zhao, and Lihua Yue. 2014. Multi-dimensional sentiment analysis for large-scale E-commerce reviews. In International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications. Springer, 449--463.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Enhancing situation awareness of public safety events by visualizing topic evolution using social media

        Recommendations

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in
        • Published in

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          dg.o '18: Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age
          May 2018
          889 pages
          ISBN:9781450365260
          DOI:10.1145/3209281

          Copyright © 2018 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 30 May 2018

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Qualifiers

          • research-article

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate150of271submissions,55%

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader