ABSTRACT
Contemporary research has introduced educational robotics in the classroom, but there are few studies about the effects of alternative embodied interaction modalities on computational thinking and science education. Twenty-six middle school students were asked to program interfaces for controlling the heading and speed of a robot using two types of embodied interaction modalities. We compared touch and full-body gestures to autonomous control, which does not require any embodied interaction. We assessed the development of their computational thinking skills by analyzing the projects they created during a problem-solving task and examined their understandings of science concepts related to kinematics. We found that novice students preferred full-body interfaces, while advanced students moved to more disembodied and abstract computational thinking. These findings might be applied to focus computing and science education activities to the right age and abilities groups of students.
- Abrahamson, D., 2014. Building educational activities for understanding: an elaboration on the embodied-design framework and its epistemic grounds. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 2(1), pp.1--16. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alimisis, D., 2013. Educational robotics: Open questions and new challenges. Themes in Science and Technology Education, 6(1), pp.63--71.Google Scholar
- Allen-Conn, B.J. and Rose, K., 2003. Powerful ideas in the classroom using squeak to enhance math and science learning. Viewpoints Research Institute, Inc.Google Scholar
- Barsalou, L.W., 2008. Grounded cognition. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 59, pp.617--645.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benitti, F. and Barreto, V., 2012. Exploring the educational potential of robotics in schools: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 58(3), pp.978--988. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bers, M.U., Flannery, L., Kazakoff, E.R. and Sullivan, A., 2014. Computational thinking and tinkering: Exploration of an early childhood robotics curriculum. Computers & Education, 72, pp.145--157.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Brennan, K. and Resnick, M., 2012, April. New frameworks for studying and assessing the development of computational thinking. In Proceedings of the 2012 annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, Canada (pp. 1--25).Google Scholar
- Fadjo, C.L., 2012. Developing computational thinking through grounded embodied cognition. Columbia University.Google Scholar
- Grover, S. and Pea, R., 2013, March. Using a discourse-intensive pedagogy and android's app inventor for introducing computational concepts to middle school students. In Proceeding of the 44th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 723--728). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Han, I. and Black, J.B., 2011. Incorporating haptic feedback in simulation for learning physics. Computers & Education, 57(4), pp.2281--2290. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacob, R.J., Girouard, A., Hirshfield, L.M., Horn, M.S., Shaer, O., Solovey, E.T. and Zigelbaum, J., 2008, April. Reality-based interaction: a framework for post-WIMP interfaces. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems (pp. 201--210). ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Johnson-Glenberg, M.C., Megowan-Romanowicz, C., Birchfield, D.A. and Savio-Ramos, C., 2016. Effects of embodied learning and digital platform on the retention of physics content: Centripetal force. Frontiers in psychology, 7, p.1819.Google Scholar
- Kafai, Y.B., Lee, E., Searle, K., Fields, D., Kaplan, E. and Lui, D., 2014. A crafts-oriented approach to computing in high school: Introducing computational concepts, practices, and perspectives with electronic textiles. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(1), p.1. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lindgren, R., Tscholl, M., Wang, S. and Johnson, E., 2016. Enhancing learning and engagement through embodied interaction within a mixed reality simulation. Computers & Education, 95, pp.174--187. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lu, C.M., Kang, S., Huang, S.C. and Black, J.B., 2011, June. Building student understanding and interest in science through embodied experiences with LEGO Robotics. In EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 2225--2232). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
- Merkouris, A., Chorianopoulos, K. and Kameas, A., 2017. Teaching programming in secondary education through embodied computing platforms: Robotics and wearables. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 17(2), p.9. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oviatt, S., Cohen, A., Miller, A., Hodge, K. and Mann, A., 2012. The impact of interface affordances on human ideation, problem solving, and inferential reasoning. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 19(3), p.22. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Papert, S., 1987, March. Tomorrow's classrooms. In New horizons in educational computing (pp. 17--20). Wiley-Interscience. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Parmar, D., Isaac, J., Babu, S.V., D'Souza, N., Leonard, A.E., Jörg, S., Gundersen, K. and Daily, S.B., 2016, March. Programming moves: Design and evaluation of applying embodied interaction in virtual environments to enhance computational thinking in middle school students. In Virtual Reality (VR), 2016 IEEE (pp. 131--140). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Read, J.C., 2008. Validating the Fun Toolkit: an instrument for measuring children's opinions of technology. Cognition, Technology & Work, 10(2), pp.119--128. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sung, W., Ahn, J.H., Kai, S.M. and Black, J., 2017, March. Effective planning strategy in robotics education: an embodied approach. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1065--1071). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).Google Scholar
- Werner, L., Denner, J. and Campe, S., 2015. Children programming games: a strategy for measuring computational learning. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 14(4), p.24. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilson, M., 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 9(4), pp.625--636.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Programming touch and full-body interaction with a remotely controlled robot in a secondary education STEM course
Recommendations
Programming Embodied Interactions with a Remotely Controlled Educational Robot
Special Section on ML Education and Regular ArticlesContemporary research has explored educational robotics, but it has not examined the development of computational thinking in the context of programming embodied interactions. Apart from the goal of the robot and how the robot will interact with its ...
Evaluation of a robotics course with the humanoid robot NAO in CS teacher education
WiPSCE '18: Proceedings of the 13th Workshop in Primary and Secondary Computing EducationUsing Educational robotics as an hands-on approach to Computer Science (CS) is very popular in international CS education. The market provides various robotics systems for CS education with regard to e.g. age group of the students. In this article we ...
Robotics to promote elementary education pre-service teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and teaching
We report a research project with a purpose of helping teachers learn how to design and implement science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) lessons using robotics. Specifically, pre-service teachers' STEM engagement, learning, and ...
Comments