skip to main content
10.1145/3333165.3333180acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesarabwicConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Open Government Data: Towards a comparison of Data Lifecycle models

Authors Info & Claims
Published:07 March 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

Government, through Open Government Data "OGD, becomes one of the important producers of open data. OGD is an opportunity to create valuable services and innovative products useful for citizens as a primarily targeted consumer. However, the expected benefits of OGD are not yet met. That is to say, several research communities' studies insist on the necessity of creating valuable data in order to generate valuable services. These studies are still insufficient for a shared understanding of how OGD contribute to the creation of value. For this purpose, this paper presents a review of a set of data lifecycle models compared against their contribution to the creation of value in the context of OGD.

References

  1. Morgan Currie (2018), A Dual Valuation of Open Government. In dg.o '18 Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research: Governance in the Data Age, Article No. 75, Delft, The Netherlands --- May 30-June 01, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Office of the Press Secretary The White House. 2013. Executive Order - Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for Government Information.(May2013).https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press office/2013/05/09/ executive-order-making-open-and machine-readable-new-default-government-Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Jos van Wezel, Achim Streit, A. Garcia, Andreas Heiss (2012), Data Life Cycle Labs, A New Concept to Support Data-Intensive Science, Published 2012 in ArXiv.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Stuti SAXENA (2017), Nature and Scope of Open Government Data (OGD) in Oman, Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences Volume 4 Issue 2 June 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Roberto D. Triviño (2016), State of Open Government Data as a Process in Ecuador, Conference: 2016 Third International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment (ICEDEG), At Sangolqui, Ecuador.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Chiehyeon Lim, Ki-HunKim, Min-JunKim, Jun-YeonHeo, Kwang-JaeKim, Paul P.Maglio (2018), From data to value: A nine-factor framework for data-based value creation in information-intensive services, International Journal of Information ManagementVolume 39, April 2018, Pages 121--135.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  7. Claudio Sonaglio Albano (2013), Open government data: a value chain model proposal. In dg.o '13 Proceedings of the 14th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research Pages 285--286, Quebec, Canada --- June 17-20, 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Mohammad Alamgir Hossain, Yogesh K. Dwivedi & Nripendra P. Rana (2016), State-of-the-art in open data research: Insights from existing literature and a research agenda, Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce Volume 26, 2016 - Issue 1-2: Open Data: Value Creation for Policy Makers and Analysts, Pages 14--40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Carmelo Francesco Origlia, Domenico Cersosimo Tito Bianchi, Alfredo Fortunato (2016), Assessing an opengovernment data initiative, The case of OpenCoesione. In Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government (CeDEM), Krems, Austria, 18-20 May 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Muhammad Anshari, Mohammad Nabil Almunawar, Syamimi Arif Lim (2018), Big Data and Open Government Data in Public Services. In ICMLC 2018 Proceedings of the 2018 10th International Conference on Machine Learning and Computing Pages 140--144, Macau, China --- February 26-28, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Adegboyega Ojo, Marijn Janssen (2014), Workshop about the understanding and improving the uptake and utilization open data. In dg.o '14 Proceedings of the 15th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research Pages 350-351 Aguascalientes, Mexico --- June 18-21, 2014. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Florian Bauer, Martin Kaltenböck (2012), Linked Open Data: The Essentials A Quick Start Guide for Decision Makers, ed. mono/monochrome, January 2012.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. https://sunlightfoundation.com/policy/documents/ten-open-data-principles/ (Accessed 24/12/2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Amir Sinaeepourfard, Jordi Garcia, Xavier Masip-Bruin, Eva Marín-Torder (2016), Towards a Comprehensive Data LifeCycle Model for Big Data Environments. In BDCAT '16 Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Big Data Computing, Applications and Technologies Pages 100-106, Shanghai, China --- December 06-09, 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Judie Attard, Fabrizio Orlandi, Sören Auer (September 2016), Data Driven Governments: Creating Value Through Open Government Data, Transactions on Large-Scale Data- and Knowledge-Centered Systems XXVII: Special Issue on Big Data for Complex Urban Systems (pp. 84--110). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Judie Attard, Fabrizio Orlandi, Sören Auer (2016), Value Creation on Open Government Data, 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Koloa, HI, USA, 5--8 Jan. 2016. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. https://www.w3.org/2011/gld/wiki/GLD_Life_cycle (Accessed 24/12/2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Beth Plale, Inna Kouper (2017), Chapter 4 -- The Centrality of Data: Data Lifecycle and Data Piplines, Data Analytics for Intelligent Transportation Systems 2017, Pages 91--111.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Fatemeh Ahmadi Zeleti, Adegboyega Ojo, Edward Curry (2016), Exploring the economic value of open government data,Government Information Quarterly Volume 33, Issue 3, July 2016, Pages 535--551.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Pin-Yu Chu, Hsien-Lee Tseng (2018), Open Data in Support of E-governance Evaluation: A Public Value Framework. In ICEGOV '18 Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance Pages 338--343 Galway, Ireland --- April 04-06, 2018. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Ricardo Matheus, Marijn Janssen, Devender Maheshwari (2018), Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities, Government Information Quarterly Available online 7 February 2018.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin Lnenicka, Jitka Komarkova (2019), Developing a government enterprise architecture framework to support the requirements of big and open linked data with the use of cloud computing, International Journal of Information Management Volume 46, June 2019, Pages 124--141.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Megan K. Sutherland, Meghan E. Cook (2017), Data-Driven Smart Cities: A Closer Look at Organizational, Technical and Data Complexities. In dg.o '17 Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research Pages 471--476, Staten Island, NY, USA --- June 07-09, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Ku, M. & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2015). Challenges for Evidence-Based Decision Making to Combat Urban Blight: Revisiting Local Government Information Management through the Lens of Code Enforcement. Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Judie Attard, Fabrizio Orlandi, Sören Auer (2016), Data Value Networks: Enabling a New Data Ecosystem, 2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence, Omaha, NE, USA, 13-16 Oct. 2016.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Iryna Susha, Marijn Janssen, Stefaan Verhulst, Theresa Pardo (2017), Data Collaboratives: How to Create Value from Data for Public Problem Solving?. In dg.o '17 Proceedings of the 18th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research Pages 604--606, Staten Island, NY, USA --- June 07-09, 2017. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Sharon S.Dawes, Lyudmila Vidiasova, Olga Parkhimovich (2016), Planning and designing open government data programs: An ecosystem approach, Government Information Quarterly Volume 33, Issue 1, January 2016, Pages 15--27.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. M. El Arass,I. Tikito,N. Souissi (2017), Data lifecycles analysis: towards intelligent cycle,2017 Intelligent Systems and Computer Vision (ISCV), Fez, Morocco, 17-19 April 2017.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. A. Sinaeepourfard, X. Masip-Bruin, J. Garcia, and E Marín-Tordera (2015), "A Survey on Data Lifecycle Models: Discussions toward the 6Vs Challenges," Technical Report (UPC-DACRR- 2015-18), 2015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Open Government Data: Towards a comparison of Data Lifecycle models

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Other conferences
      ArabWIC 2019: Proceedings of the ArabWIC 6th Annual International Conference Research Track
      March 2019
      136 pages
      ISBN:9781450360890
      DOI:10.1145/3333165

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 March 2019

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed limited

      Acceptance Rates

      ArabWIC 2019 Paper Acceptance Rate20of36submissions,56%Overall Acceptance Rate20of36submissions,56%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader