skip to main content
research-article
Public Access

How Computers See Gender: An Evaluation of Gender Classification in Commercial Facial Analysis Services

Published:07 November 2019Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Investigations of facial analysis (FA) technologies-such as facial detection and facial recognition-have been central to discussions about Artificial Intelligence's (AI) impact on human beings. Research on automatic gender recognition, the classification of gender by FA technologies, has raised potential concerns around issues of racial and gender bias. In this study, we augment past work with empirical data by conducting a systematic analysis of how gender classification and gender labeling in computer vision services operate when faced with gender diversity. We sought to understand how gender is concretely conceptualized and encoded into commercial facial analysis and image labeling technologies available today. We then conducted a two-phase study: (1) a system analysis of ten commercial FA and image labeling services and (2) an evaluation of five services using a custom dataset of diverse genders using self-labeled Instagram images. Our analysis highlights how gender is codified into both classifiers and data standards. We found that FA services performed consistently worse on transgender individuals and were universally unable to classify non-binary genders. In contrast, image labeling often presented multiple gendered concepts. We also found that user perceptions about gender performance and identity contradict the way gender performance is encoded into the computer vision infrastructure. We discuss our findings from three perspectives of gender identity (self-identity, gender performativity, and demographic identity) and how these perspectives interact across three layers: the classification infrastructure, the third-party applications that make use of that infrastructure, and the individuals who interact with that software. We employ Bowker and Star's concepts of "torque" and "residuality" to further discuss the social implications of gender classification. We conclude by outlining opportunities for creating more inclusive classification infrastructures and datasets, as well as with implications for policy.

References

  1. 2019. Amazon Rekognition -- Video and Image - AWS. https://aws.amazon.com/rekognition/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2019. Clarifai. https://clarifai.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 2019. Face API - Facial Recognition Software | Microsoft Azure. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/ cognitive-services/face/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 2019. Face++ Cognitive Services - Leading Facial Recognition Technology. https://www.faceplusplus.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 2019. Vision API - Image Content Analysis | Cloud Vision API | Google Cloud. https://cloud.google.com/vision/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 2019. Watson Visual Recognition. https://www.ibm.com/watson/services/visual-recognition/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Yaman Akbulut, Abdulkadir Sengur, and Sami Ekici. 2017. Gender recognition from face images with deep learning. In 2017 International Artificial Intelligence and Data Processing Symposium (IDAP). IEEE, 1--4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ idap.2017.8090181Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Tawfiq Ammari, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Silvia Lindtner. 2017. The Crafting of DIY Fatherhood. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing - CSCW '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1109--1122. https://doi.org/10.1145/2998181.2998270Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Ankan Bansal, Anirudh Nanduri, Carlos D. Castillo, Rajeev Ranjan, and Rama Chellappa. 2018. UMDFaces: An annotated face dataset for training deep networks. In IEEE International Joint Conference on Biometrics, IJCB 2017, Vol. 2018-Janua. IEEE, 464--473. https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2017.8272731Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '10. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1301. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Kyla Bender-Baird. 2015. Peeing under surveillance: bathrooms, gender policing, and hate violence. Gender, Place & Culture 23, 7 (jul 2015), 983--988. https://doi.org/10.1080/0966369x.2015.1073699Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Sebastian Benthall and Bruce D. Haynes. 2019. Racial categories in machine learning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency - FAT* '19. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 289--298. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287575 arXiv:1811.11668Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Talia Mae Bettcher. 2007. Evil Deceivers and Make-Believers: On Transphobic Violence and the Politics of Illusion. Hypatia 22, 3 (aug 2007), 43--65. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1527--2001.2007.tb01090.xGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Rena Bivens. 2014. The Gender Binary Will Not Be Deprogrammed: Facebook's Antagonistic Relationship to Gender. SSRN Electronic Journal (dec 2014). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2431443Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. Rena Bivens and Oliver L. Haimson. 2016. Baking Gender Into Social Media Design: How Platforms Shape Categories for Users and Advertisers. Social Media + Society 2, 4 (nov 2016), 1--12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116672486Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Lindsay Blackwell, Jill Dimond, Sarita Schoenebeck, and Cliff Lampe. 2017. Classification and Its Consequences for Online Harassment: Design Insights from HeartMob ACM Reference format. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. Article Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact 1, 2 (2017), 1--19. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3134659Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Brad Smith. 2018. Facial recognition: It's time for action. https://blogs.microsoft.com/on-the-issues/2018/12/06/ facial-recognition-its-time-for-action/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Jed R. Brubaker and Gillian R. Hayes. 2011. SELECT * FROM USER: infrastructure and socio-technical representation. In Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work - CSCW '11. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 369. https://doi.org/10.1145/1958824.1958881Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender Shades: Intersectional Accuracy Disparities in Commercial Gender Classification *. Technical Report. 1--15 pages. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/buolamwini18a/buolamwini18a.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Robin Burke, Nasim Sonboli, and Aldo Ordonez-Gauger. 2018. Balanced Neighborhoods for Multi-sided Fairness in Recommendation. , 202--214 pages. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v81/burke18a.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Judith Butler. 1988. Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal 40, 4 (dec 1988), 519. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Ting Chen, Wei Li Han, Hai Dong Wang, Yi Xun Zhou, Bin Xu, and Bin Yu Zang. 2007. Content recommendation system based on private dynamic user profile. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics, ICMLC 2007, Vol. 4. IEEE, 2112--2118. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICMLC.2007.4370493Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. John Cheney-Lippold. 2011. A New Algorithmic Identity: Soft Biopolitics and the Modulation of Control. Theory, Culture & Society 28, 6 (nov 2011), 164--181. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411424420Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Sam Corbett-Davies and Sharad Goel. 2018. The Measure and Mismeasure of Fairness: A Critical Review of Fair Machine Learning. (jul 2018). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3627170 arXiv:1808.00023Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Critical Art Ensemble. 1998. Flesh Machine. http://critical-art.net/flesh-machine-1997--98/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Paisley Currah and Tara Mulqueen. 2011. Securitizing Gender: Identity, Biometrics, and Transgender Bodies at the Airport. Social Research 78, 2 (2011), 557--582. https://doi.org/10.1353/sor.2011.0030Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Ya E. Dai, Hong Wu Ye, and Song Jie Gong. 2009. Personalized recommendation algorithm using user demography information. In Proceedings - 2009 2nd International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, WKKD 2009. IEEE, 100--103. https://doi.org/10.1109/WKDD.2009.156Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  28. Avery Dame. 2016. Making a name for yourself: tagging as transgender ontological practice on Tumblr. Critical Studies in Media Communication 33, 1 (jan 2016), 23--37. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2015.1130846Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Scott Dance. 2019. Maryland set to add 'X' gender designation to driver's licenses under bill by General Assembly. https://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/bs-md-drivers-licenses-20190313-story.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Heath Fogg Davis. 2017. Beyond Trans: Does Gender Matter? https://books.google.com/books?id= uHA4DQAAQBAJ{&}source=gbs{_}navlinks{_}sGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Zak Doffman. 2019. Is Microsoft AI Helping To Deliver China's 'Shameful' Xinjiang Surveillance State? https://www.forbes.com/sites/zakdoffman/2019/03/15/ microsoft-denies-new-links-to-chinas-surveillance-state-but-its-complicated/{#}4cb624f73061Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Grant Duwe and Ki Deuk Kim. 2017. Out With the Old and in With the New? An Empirical Comparison of Supervised Learning Algorithms to Predict Recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review 28, 6 (jul 2017), 570--600. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887403415604899Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Brianna Dym, Jed Brubaker, and Casey Fielser. 2018. "they're all trans sharon": Authoring Gender in Video Game Fan Fiction. Game Studies 3, 18 (2018). http://gamestudies.org/1803/articles/brubaker{_}dym{_}fieslerhttp://gamestudies. org/1701/articles/andersonGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. W. Keith Edwards, MarkW. Newman, and Erika Shehan Poole. 2010. The infrastructure problem in HCI. In Proceedings of the 28th international conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI '10. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 423. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753390Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Elise Schmelzer. 2018. Colorado to allow use of X as sex identifier on driver's licenses starting this month.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Erik Carter. 2019. Facial recognition's 'dirty little secret': Millions of online photos scraped without consent. https:// www.nbcnews.com/tech/internet/facial-recognition-s-dirty-little-secret-millions-online-photos-scraped-n981921Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Erik H. (Erik Homburger) Erikson and Joan M. (Joan Mowat) Erikson. 1982. The life cycle completed. (1982), 134. https://www.worldcat.org/title/life-cycle-completed/oclc/916049006Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Melanie Feinberg, Daniel Carter, and Julia Bullard. 2014. A Story Without End : Writing the Residual into Descriptive Infrastructure. DIS '14 Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference (2014), 385--394. https://doi.org/10. 1145/2598510.2598553Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  39. Casey Fiesler and Nicholas Proferes. 2018. "Participant" Perceptions of Twitter Research Ethics. Social Media and Society 4, 1 (jan 2018), 205630511876336. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305118763366Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Brian Joseph Gilley. 2016. Imagining Transgender: An Ethnography of a Category. David Valentine. In Journal of Anthropological Research. Vol. 65. Duke University Press, Chapter Imagining, 516--517. https://doi.org/10.1086/jar.65. 3.25608249Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Erving. Goffman. 1956. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. The Production of Reality: Essays and Readings on Social Interaction (1956), 262. https://books.google.com/books/about/ The{_}Presentation{_}of{_}Self{_}in{_}Everyday{_}Lif.html?id=Sdt-cDkV8pQCGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Patrick Grother, Mei Ngan, Kayee Hanaoka, and Wilbur L Ross. 2018. Ongoing Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) Part 2: Identification. NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR) (nov 2018). https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8238Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2015. Disclosure, Stress, and Support During Gender Transition on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15). ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1176--1190. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 2675133.2675152Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  44. Oliver L. Haimson and Anna Lauren Hoffmann. 2016. Constructing and enforcing "authentic" identity online: Facebook, real names, and non-normative identities. First Monday 21, 6 (jun 2016). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i6.6791Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Jack Halberstam. 1998. Female Masculinity. https://books.google.com/books/about/Female{_}Masculinity.html?id= 5BqOswEACAAJ{&}source=kp{_}book{_}descriptionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Foad Hamidi, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, and Stacy M Branham. 2018. Gender Recognition or Gender Reductionism? The Social Implications of Automatic Gender Recognition Systems. In 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '18).Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  47. D. Fox Harrell. 2009. Computational and cognitive infrastructures of stigma. In Proceeding of the seventh ACM conference on Creativity and cognition - C&C '09. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 49. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 1640233.1640244Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Jody L Herman. 2013. Gendered restrooms and minority stress: The public regulation of gender and its impact on transgender people's lives. Journal of Public Management and Social Policy (2013), 65--80. https://williamsinstitute. law.ucla.edu/wp-content/uploads/Herman-Gendered-Restrooms-and-Minority-Stress-June-2013.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Marie Hicks. 2019. Hacking the Cis-tem: Transgender Citizens and the Early Digital State. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing 41, 1 (jan 2019), 1--1. https://doi.org/10.1109/mahc.2019.2897667Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Sandy E. James, Jody L. Herman, Susan Rankin, Mara Keisling, Lisa Mottet, and Ma'ayan Anafi. 2016. The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Technical Report. National Center for Transgender Equality. 298 pages. http://www.transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/usts/USTSFullReport-FINAL1.6.17.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. James Vincent. 2017. Transgender YouTubers had their videos grabbed to train facial recognition software. https: //www.theverge.com/2017/8/22/16180080/transgender-youtubers-ai-facial-recognition-datasetGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. James Vincent. 2019. AI researchers tell Amazon to stop selling ?flawed' facial recognition to the police. https://www.theverge.com/2019/4/3/18291995/ amazon-facial-recognition-technology-rekognition-police-ai-researchers-ban-flawed?fbclid= IwAR2BE5ObzjkVeq5W6hlPVobNsyEYCfAvIYZV6Jq-0I0HlErQkxniHpHoDIcGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. Stephanie Julia Kapusta. 2016. Misgendering and Its Moral Contestability. Hypatia 31, 3 (aug 2016), 502--519. https://doi.org/10.1111/hypa.12259Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Soon-Gyo Jung, Jisun An, Haewoon Kwak, Joni Salminen, and Bernard Jim Jansen. 2018. Assessing the Accuracy of Four Popular Face Recognition Tools for Inferring Gender, Age, and Race. In Proceedings of the Twelfth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 624--627. https://www.cnet.com/news/google-apologizes-for-algorithm-https: //aaai.org/ocs/index.php/ICWSM/ICWSM18/paper/view/17839Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. Yannis Kalantidis, Munmun De Choudhury, Jessica A. Pater, Stevie Chancellor, and David A. Shamma. 2017. Multimodal Classification of Moderated Online Pro-Eating Disorder Content. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 3213--3226. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025985Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Jakko Kemper and Daan Kolkman. 2018. Transparent to whom? No algorithmic accountability without a critical audience., 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1477967Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. Os Keyes. 2018. The Misgendering Machines: Trans/HCI Implications of Automatic Gender Recognition. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2, CSCW (nov 2018), 1--22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274357Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  58. Liza Khan. 2011. Transgender Health at the Crossroads: Legal Norms, Insurance Markets, and the Threat of Healthcare Reform. Yale Journal of Health Policy, Law & Ethics 11, c (2011), 375--418. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle= hein.journals/yjhple11{&}id=381{&}collection=journals{&}index=Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  59. Sajid Ali Khan, Maqsood Ahmad, Muhammad Nazir, and Naveed Riaz. 2013. A comparative analysis of gender classification techniques. International Journal of Bio-Science and Bio-Technology 5, 4 (2013), 223--243. https: //doi.org/10.5829/idosi.mejsr.2014.20.01.11434Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Anja Lambrecht and Catherine E. Tucker. 2016. Algorithmic Bias? An Empirical Study into Apparent Gender-Based Discrimination in the Display of STEM Career Ads. (2016). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2852260Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. Alex Leavitt. 2015. "This is a Throwaway Account": Temporary Technical Identities and Perceptions of Anonymity in a Massive Online Community. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing - CSCW '15. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 317--327. https://doi.org/10.1145/2675133. 2675175Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  62. Hongjun Li and Ching Y. Suen. 2016. Robust face recognition based on dynamic rank representation. Pattern Recognition 60, C (dec 2016), 13--24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2016.05.014Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. Stan Z. Li and Anil K. Jain. 2011. Handbook of Face Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0--85729--932--1Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  64. Yang Li, Suhang Wang, Jiliang Tang, Quan Pan, and Tao Yang. 2017. Price Recommendation on Vacation Rental Websites. In Proceedings of the 2017 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. 399--407. https://doi.org/10.1137/ 1.9781611974973.45Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Lindsay Schrupp. 2019. Why We Created a Gender-Inclusive Stock Photo Library. https://broadly.vice.com/en{_}us/article/qvyq8p/transgender-non-binary-stock-photos-gender-spectrum-collectionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Ziwei Liu, Ping Luo, XiaogangWang, and Xiaoou Tang. 2015. Deep learning face attributes in the wild. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, Vol. 2015 Inter. 3730--3738. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCV.2015.425 arXiv:1411.7766Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  67. Xiaoguang Lu and Anil K Jain. 2004. Ethnicity Identification from Face Images. Proceedings of SPIE 5404 (2004), 114--123. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.542847Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. Gayathri Mahalingam and Karl Ricanek. 2013. Is the eye region more reliable than the face? A preliminary study of face-based recognition on a transgender dataset. In IEEE 6th International Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS 2013). IEEE, 1--7. https://doi.org/10.1109/BTAS.2013.6712710Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Makena Kelly. 2019. Pressure mounts on Google, Microsoft, and Amazon's facial recognition tech. https://www.theverge.com/2019/1/15/18183789/google-amazon-microsoft-pressure-facial-recognition-jedi-pentagon-defense-governmentGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. James E Marcia. 1966. Development and Validation of Ego-Identity Status. Ph.D. Dissertation. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/f145/f3fbada1eb7a01052255f586094301669287.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. Annette Markham. 2012. Fabrication as ethical practice: Qualitative inquiry in ambiguous Internet contexts. Information Communication and Society 15, 3 (apr 2012), 334--353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.641993Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  72. Matthew Gault. 2019. Facial Recognition Software Regularly Misgenders Trans People. https://motherboard.vice. com/en{_}us/article/7xnwed/facial-recognition-software-regularly-misgenders-trans-peopleGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. John D. McKinnon and Jeff Horwitz. 2019. HUD Action Against Facebook Signals Trouble for Other Platforms. https://www.wsj.com/articles/u-s-charges-facebook-with-violating-fair-housing-laws-11553775078Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. Kevin A. McLemore. 2015. Experiences with Misgendering: Identity Misclassification of Transgender Spectrum Individuals. Self and Identity 14, 1 (jan 2015), 51--74. https://doi.org/10.1080/15298868.2014.950691Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. Cade Metz. 2019. Is Ethical A.I. Even Possible? https://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/01/business/ ethics-artificial-intelligence.htmlhttps://www.nytimes.com/2019/03/01/business/ethics-artificial-intelligence. html?utm{_}source=Benedict{%}27s+newsletter{&}utm{_}campaign=a333b6b622-Benedict{%}27s+ Newsletter{_}COPY{_}01{&}utm{_}Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. Vidya Muthukumar, Tejaswini Pedapati, Nalini Ratha, Prasanna Sattigeri, Chai-Wah Wu, Brian Kingsbury, Abhishek Kumar, Samuel Thomas, Aleksandra Mojsilovic, and Kush R Varshney. 2018. Understanding Unequal Gender Classification Accuracy from Face Images. (2018). arXiv:1812.00099 https://github.com/ox-vgg/vgg{_}face2http: //arxiv.org/abs/1812.00099Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  77. Viviane K. Namaste. 2006. Invisible Lives: The Erasure of Transsexual and Transgendered People. Contemporary Sociology 31, 3 (2006), 264. https://doi.org/10.2307/3089651Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. Natalia Drozdiak. 2019. Microsoft Seeks to Restrict Abuse of its Facial Recognition AI. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2019-01--23/microsoft-seeks-to-restrict-abuse-of-its-facial-recognition-aiGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. A.J. Neuman Wipfler. 2016. Identity Crisis: the Limitations of Expanding Government Recognition of Gender Identity and the Possibility of Genderless Identity Documents. Harvard Journal of Law and Gender 39, 2 (2016), 401--464. https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/hwlj39{&}id=505{&}collection=journals{&}index=Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. Choon Boon Ng, Yong Haur Tay, and Bok Min Goi. 2015. A review of facial gender recognition. Pattern Analysis and Applications 18, 4 (nov 2015), 739--755. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10044-015-0499--6Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  81. Mei Ngan and Patrick Grother. 2015. Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) - Performance of Automated Gender Classification Algorithms. Technical Report. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8052Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. Ziad Obermeyer and Sendhil Mullainathan. 2019. Dissecting Racial Bias in an Algorithm that Guides Health Decisions for 70 Million People. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency - FAT* '19. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 89--89. https://doi.org/10.1145/3287560.3287593Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  83. Sara Ashley O'Brien. [n. d.]. What is Amazon's responsibility over its facial recognition tech? https://money.cnn. com/2018/07/26/technology/amazon-facial-recognition/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. Joseph O'Sullivan. 2019. Washington Senate approves consumer-privacy bill to place restrictions on facial recognition. https://www.seattletimes.com/seattle-news/politics/senate-passes-bill-to-create-a-european-style-consumer-data-privacy-law-in-washington/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. J. Marc Overhage and Jeffery G. Suico. 2013. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Annals of Internal Medicine 135, 10 (2013), 934. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003--4819--135--10--200111200-00030 arXiv:arXiv:1011.1669v3Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  86. P Jonathon Phillips, Abhijit Narvekar, Alice J. O'Toole, Fang Jiang, and Julianne Ayyad. 2011. An other-race effect for face recognition algorithms. ACM Transactions on Applied Perception 8, 2 (2011), 1--11. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 1870076.1870082Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  87. Mark Poster. 2013. The Mode of Information: Poststructuralism and Social Context. Polity Press. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl_52_03_300Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  88. Rachel Metz. 2019. Amazon shareholders want it to stop selling facial-recognition tech to the government. https://www.cnn.com/2019/01/17/tech/amazon-shareholders-facial-recognition/index.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. Inioluwa Deborah Raji and Joy Buolamwini. 2019. Actionable Auditing: Investigating the Impact of Publicly Naming Biased Performance Results of Commercial AI Products. Technical Report. 7 pages. www.aaai.orgGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. Arnaud Ramey and Miguel A. Salichs. 2014. Morphological Gender Recognition by a Social Robot and Privacy Concerns. Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE Iternational conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '14) (2014), 272--273. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559636.2563714Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  91. Andrew G Reece and Christopher M Danforth. 2017. Instagram photos reveal predictive markers of depression. EPJ Data Science 6, 1 (dec 2017), 15. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-017-0110-z arXiv:1608.03282Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. Jennifer A Rode. 2011. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 393--400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.04.005Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  93. Pau Rodríguez, Guillem Cucurull, Josep M. Gonfaus, F. Xavier Roca, and Jordi Gonzàlez. 2017. Age and gender recognition in the wild with deep attention. Pattern Recognition 72 (dec 2017), 563--571. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PATCOG.2017.06.028Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. Janus Rose. 2019. I'm a trans woman -- here's why algorithms scare me | Dazed. https://www.dazeddigital.com/science-tech/article/43211/1/trans-algorithm-machine-learning-bias-discrimination-chelsea-manning-editGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. Gayle Rubin. 2013. Literary theory: an anthology. In Choice Reviews Online, Julie Rivkin and Michael Ryan (Eds.). Vol. 35. Chapter The Traffi, 35--5478--35--5478. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.35--5478Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. Russell Brandom. 2019. Crucial biometric privacy law survives Illinois court fight. https://www.theverge.com/2019/1/26/18197567/six-flags-illinois-biometric-information-privacy-act-facial-recognitionGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  97. Manisha M. Sawant and Kishor M. Bhurchandi. 2018. Age invariant face recognition: a survey on facial aging databases, techniques and effect of aging. Artificial Intelligence Review (oct 2018), 1--28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018--9661-zGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  98. Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Stacy M Branham, and Foad Hamidi. 2018. Safe Spaces and Safe Places: Unpacking Technology-Mediated Experiences of Safety and Harm with Transgender People. Proceedings of the ACM on Human- Computer Interaction 2 (2018), 29.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  99. Ari Schlesinger, Christina A. Masden, Rebecca E. Grinter, Eshwar Chandrasekharan, W. Keith Edwards, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2017. Situated Anonymity: Impacts of Anonymity, Ephemerality, and Hyper-Locality on Social Media. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 6912--6924. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025682Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. Sidney Fussell. 2019. San Francisco Wants to Ban Government Face Recognition. https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2019/02/san-francisco-proposes-ban-government-face-recognition/581923/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. Jacob Snow. 2018. Amazon's Face Recognition Falsely Matched 28 Members of Congress With Mugshots.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. Brooke Sopelsa. 2018. Gender 'X': New York City to add third gender option to birth certificates. https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc-out/gender-x-new-york-city-add-third-gender-option-birth-n909021Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  103. Susan Stryker. 2006. (De)subjugated Knowledges: An Introduction to Transgender Studies. In The Transgender Studies Reader. Routledge, 1--15. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203955055--7Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. G Subbalakshmi. 2011. Decision Support in Heart Disease Prediction System using Naive Bayes. Indian Journal of Computer... (2011). http://www.ijcse.com/docs/IJCSE11-02-02--56.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. Tom Simonite. 2019. Microsoft Wants Rules for Facial Recognition-Just Not These. https://www.wired.com/story/ microsoft-wants-rules-facial-recognition-just-not-these/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. E. B. Towle. 2005. ROMANCING THE TRANSGENDER NATIVE: Rethinking the Use of the "Third Gender" Concept. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 8, 4 (jan 2005), 469--497. https://doi.org/10.1215/10642684--8--4--469Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. Jacques Veron, Samuel H. Preston, Patrick. Heuveline, and Michel Guillot. 2006. Demography: Measuring and Modeling Population Processes. Population (French Edition) 57, 3 (2006), 591. https://doi.org/10.2307/1535065Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  108. Shui HuaWang, Preetha Phillips, Zheng Chao Dong, and Yu Dong Zhang. 2018. Intelligent facial emotion recognition based on stationary wavelet entropy and Jaya algorithm. Neurocomputing 272 (jan 2018), 668--676. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.neucom.2017.08.015Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  109. Yilin Wang, Neil O'Hare, Baoxin Li, Yali Wan, Jiliang Tang, Jundong Li, Clayton Mellina, and Yi Chang. 2017. Understanding and Discovering Deliberate Self-harm Content in Social Media. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web - WWW '17. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 93--102. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3038912.3052555Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  110. Laurel Westbrook and Kristen Schilt. 2013. Doing Gender, Determining Gender. Gender & Society 28, 1 (feb 2013), 32--57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243213503203Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. Will Knight. 2018. Facial recognition has to be regulated to protect the public, says AI report. https://www. technologyreview.com/s/612552/facial-recognition-has-to-be-regulated-to-protect-the-public-says-ai-report/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. O. Wilson. 2013. Violence and Mental Health in the Transgender Community. December (2013). https://search.proquest.com/docview/1647175438?pq-origsite=gscholarGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. Stelios C. Wilson, Shane D. Morrison, Lavinia Anzai, Jonathan P. Massie, Grace Poudrier, Catherine C. Motosko, and Alexes Hazen. 2018. Masculinizing Top Surgery: A Systematic Review of Techniques and Outcomes. , 679--683 pages. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000001354Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. Aimee Wodda and Vanessa Panfil. 2015. "Don't talk to me about deception": The necessary erosion of the trans* panic defense. Albany Law Review 78, 3 (2015), 927--971. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 arXiv:arXiv:1011.1669v3Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. Steve Woolgar and Lucy Alice. Suchman. 1989. Plans and Situated Actions: The Problem of Human Machine Communication. Contemporary Sociology 18, 3 (1989), 414. https://doi.org/10.2307/2073874Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  116. Billy Yapriady and Alexandra L. Uitdenbogerd. 2010. Combining Demographic Data with Collaborative Filtering for Automatic Music Recommendation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 201--207. https://doi.org/10.1007/11554028_29Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  117. Ni Zhuang, Yan Yan, Si Chen, Hanzi Wang, and Chunhua Shen. 2018. Multi-label learning based deep transfer neural network for facial attribute classification. Pattern Recognition 80 (2018), 225--240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2018.03.018 arXiv:arXiv:1805.01282v1Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  118. Indre Zliobaite and Bart Custers. 2016. Using sensitive personal data may be necessary for avoiding discrimination in data-driven decision models. Artificial Intelligence and Law 24, 2 (jun 2016), 183--201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10506-016--9182--5Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. How Computers See Gender: An Evaluation of Gender Classification in Commercial Facial Analysis Services

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction
      Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction  Volume 3, Issue CSCW
      November 2019
      5026 pages
      EISSN:2573-0142
      DOI:10.1145/3371885
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2019 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 7 November 2019
      Published in pacmhci Volume 3, Issue CSCW

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader