ABSTRACT
Automatic Gender Recognition (AGR) refers to various computational methods that aim to identify an individual's gender by extracting and analyzing features from images, video, and/or audio. Applications of AGR are increasingly being explored in domains such as security, marketing, and social robotics. However, little is known about stakeholders' perceptions and attitudes towards AGR and how this technology might disproportionately affect vulnerable communities. To begin to address these gaps, we interviewed 13 transgender individuals, including three transgender technology designers, about their perceptions and attitudes towards AGR. We found that transgender individuals have overwhelmingly negative attitudes towards AGR and fundamentally question whether it can accurately recognize such a subjective aspect of their identity. They raised concerns about privacy and potential harms that can result from being incorrectly gendered, or misgendered, by technology. We present a series of recommendations on how to accommodate gender diversity when designing new digital systems.
Supplemental Material
- AJL - Algorithmic Justice League. Retrieved September 7, 2017 from https://www.ajlunited.org/Google Scholar
- Rena Bivens and Oliver L. Haimson. 2016. Baking Gender Into Social Media Design: How Platforms Shape Categories for Users and Advertisers. Social Media + Society 2, 4: 1--12.Google Scholar
- Lindsay Blackwell, Jean Hardy, Tawfiq Ammari, Tiffany Veinot, Cliff Lampe, and Sarita Schoenebeck. 2016. LGBT Parents and Social Media: Advocacy, Privacy, and Disclosure During Shifting Social Movements. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 610--622. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zach Blas. 2011. Facial Weaponization Suite | zach blas. Zac Blas. Retrieved September 7, 2017 from http://www.zachblas.info/works/facial-weaponizationsuite/Google Scholar
- Judith Butler. 1988. Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An Essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal 40, 4: 519.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Liangliang Cao, Mert Dikmen, Yun Fu, and Thomas S. Huang. 2008. Gender Recognition from Body. In Proceeding of the 16th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM '08), 725--728. Google ScholarDigital Library
- John Christman. 2015. Autonomy in Moral and Political Philosophy. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.Google Scholar
- Andrew R. Flores, Jody L. Herman, Gary J. Gates, and Taylor N. T. Brown. 2016. How Many Adults Identify As Transgender in the USA? Los Angeles, CA. Retrieved August 22, 2017 from https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/wpcontent/uploads/How-Many-Adults-Identify-asTransgender-in-the-United-States.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Batya Friedman and Peter H. Kahn. 2008. Human values, ethics, and design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Batya Friedman. 1996. Value-sensitive design. Interactions 3, 6: 16--23. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Batya Friedman, Eric Brok, Susan King Roth, and John Thomas. 1996. Minimizing bias in computer systems. ACM SIGCHI Bulletin 28, 1: 48--51. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Beatrice A. Golomb, David T. Lawrence, Terrence J. Sejnowski. 1990. Sexnet: A Neural Network Identifies Sex from Human Faces. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 3: 572--577. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jaime M. Grant, Lisa A. Mottet, Justin Tanis, Jack Harrison, Jody L. Herman, and Mara Keisling. 2011. Injustice at Every Turn: A Report of the National Transgender Discrimination Survey. Washington National Center for Transgender Equality and National Gay and Lesbian Task Force.Google Scholar
- Ansara Y. Gavriel and Peter Hegarty. 2014. Methodologies of misgendering: Recommendations for reducing cisgenderism in psychological research. Feminism & Psychology 24, 2: 259--270.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2015. Disclosure, Stress, and Support During Gender Transition on Facebook. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (CSCW '15), 1176--1190. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oliver L. Haimson, Jed R. Brubaker, Lynn Dombrowski, and Gillian R. Hayes. 2016. Digital Footprints and Changing Networks During Online Identity Transitions. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '16), 2895--2907. Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Hankerson, Andrea R Marshall, Jennifer Booker, Houda El Mimouni, Imani Walker, and Jennifer A Rode. 2016. Does Technology Have Race? In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA '16), 473--486. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lucas D Introna and David Wood. 2004. Picturing Algorithmic Surveillance: The Politics of Facial Recognition Systems. Surveillance & Society 2, 2/3: 177--198.Google Scholar
- Sandy E. James, Jody L. Herman, Susan Rankin, Mara Keisling, Lisa Mottet, and Ma'ayan Anafi. 2016. The Report of the 2015 U.S. Transgender Survey. Retrieved August 22, 2017 from http://www.transequality.org/sites/default/files/docs/us ts/USTS Full Report - FINAL 1.6.17.pdfGoogle Scholar
- James Vincent. 2017. Transgender YouTubers had their videos grabbed to train facial recognition software. The Verge. Retrieved August 28, 2017 from https://www.theverge.com/2017/8/22/16180080/transg ender-youtubers-ai-facial-recognition-datasetGoogle Scholar
- Haiyan Jia, Mu Wu, Eunhwa Jung, Alice Shapiro, and S. Shyam Sundar. 2012. Balancing Human Agency and Object Agency: An End-User Interview Study of the Internet of Things. In Proceedings of the 2012 ACM Conference on Ubiquitous Computing (UbiComp '12), 1185--1188. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stephanie Julia Kapusta. 2016. Misgendering and Its Moral Contestability. Hypatia 31, 3: 502--519.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gopinaath Kannabiran and Marianne Graves Petersen. 2010. Politics at the Interface: A Foucauldian Power Analysis. In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries (NordiCHI '10), 695--698. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michal Kosinski, David Stillwell, and Thore Graepel. 2013. Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA of America 110, 15: 5802--5.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Irwin Krieger. 2017. The Impact of Stigma on Transgender and Non-Binary Youth. In Counseling Transgender and Non-Binary Youth: The Essential Guide. Jessica Kingsley Publisher, 46--47.Google Scholar
- Vijay Kumar, R. Raghavendra, Anoop Namboodiri, and Christoph Busch. 2016. Robust transgender face recognition: Approach based on appearance and therapy factors. In IEEE Conference on Identity, Security and Behavior Analysis (ISBA 2016), 1--7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chien-Cheng Lee and Chung-Shun Wei. 2013. Gender Recognition Based On Combining Facial and Hair Features. In Proceedings of International Conference on Advances in Mobile Computing & Multimedia (MoMM '13), 537--540. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gayathri Mahalingam and Karl Ricanek. HRT Transgender Dataset. Retrieved August 23, 2017 from http://www.faceaginggroup.com/hrt-transgender/Google Scholar
- Gayathri Mahalingam and Karl Ricanek. 2013. Is the eye region more reliable than the face? A preliminary study of face-based recognition on a transgender dataset. In IEEE Conference on Biometrics: Theory, Applications and Systems (BTAS 2013), 1--7.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Erno Makinen and Roope Raisamo. 2008. Evaluation of gender classification methods with automatically detected and aligned faces. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 30, 3: 541-- 547. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kevin A. McLemore. 2015. Experiences with Misgendering: Identity Misclassification of Transgender Spectrum Individuals. Self and Identity 14, 1: 51--74.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Choon Boon Ng, Yong Haur Tay, and Bok Min Goi. 2015. A review of facial gender recognition. Pattern Analysis and Applications 18, 4: 739--755. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mei Ngan and Patrick Grother. 2015. Face Recognition Vendor Test (FRVT) - Performance of Automated Gender Classification Algorithms. NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR) - 8052.Google Scholar
- Nick Whigham. 2017. Glitch in digital pizza advert goes viral, shows disturbing future of facial recognition tech. news.com.au. Retrieved September 18, 2017 from http://www.news.com.au/technology/innovation/desig n/glitch-in-digital-pizza-advert-goes-viral-showsdisturbing-future-of-facial-recognition-tech/newsstory/3b43904b6dd5444a279fd3cd6f8551dbGoogle Scholar
- Y. Avriel Ansara. 2012. Cisgenderism in medical settings: How collaborative partnerships can challenge structural violence. In Out of the Ordinary: LGBT Lives. Cambridge Scholars Publishing, Cambridge, 102--122.Google Scholar
- Cathy O'Neil. 2016. Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown Random House. Google Scholar
- Özlem Özbudak, Mürvet Kirci, Yüksel Çakir, and Ece Olcay Güneş. 2010. Effects of the Facial and Racial Features on Gender Classification. In Proceedings of the Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), 26--29.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joyojeet Pal, Anandhi Viswanathan, Priyank Chandra, Anisha Nazareth, Vaishnav Kameswaran, Hariharan Subramonyam, Aditya Johri, Mark S. Ackerman, and Sile O'Modhrain. 2017. Agency in Assistive Technology Adoption: Visual Impairment and Smartphone Use in Bangalore. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 5929--5940. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Arnaud Ramey and Miguel A. Salichs. 2014. Morphological Gender Recognition by a Social Robot and Privacy Concerns. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM/IEEE Iternational conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI '14): 272--273. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jemima Repo. 2017. The Biopolitics of Gender. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bridget A Sarpu. 2015. Google: The Endemic Threat to Privacy. Journal of High Technology Law XV, April 2012. Retrieved September 7, 2017 from https://sites.suffolk.edu/jhtl/files/2014/12/SarpuGoogle-The-Endemic-Threat-to-Privacy.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Christine Satchell. 2010. Women are people too: The problem of designing for gender. Retrieved December 18, 2017 from https://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/events/experiencingcriticalth eory/Satchell-WomenArePeople.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Ari Schlesinger, W. Keith Edwards, and Rebecca E. Grinter. 2017. Intersectional HCI: Engaging Identity through Gender, Race, and Class. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '17), 5412--5427. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Michael Skirpan and Micha Gorelick. 2017. The Authority of "Fair" in Machine Learning. Retrieved September 7, 2017 from https://arxiv.org/pdf/1706.09976.pdfGoogle Scholar
- Jinshan Tang, Xiaoming Liu, Huaining Cheng, and Kathleen M. Robinette. 2011. Gender recognition using 3-D human body shapes. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews 41, 6: 898--908. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jisha C. Thankappan and Sumam M. Idicula. 2010. Language Independent Voice-Based Gender Identification System. In Proceedings of the 1st Amrita ACM-W Celebration on Women in Computing in India (A2CWiC '10), 1996: 1--6. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Transgender (1974). In Merriam-Webster's Dictionary. Retrieved September 3, 2017 from https://www.merriamwebster.com/dictionary/transgenderGoogle Scholar
- Archana Vijayan, Shyma Kareem, and Jubilant J. Kizhakkethottam. 2016. Face Recognition Across Gender Transformation Using SVM Classifier. Procedia Technology 24: 1366--1373.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Shiqi Yu, Tieniu Tan, Kaiqi Huang, Kui Jia, and Xinyu Wu. 2009. A Study on Gait-Based Gender Classification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 18, 8: 1905--1910. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Gender Recognition or Gender Reductionism?: The Social Implications of Embedded Gender Recognition Systems
Recommendations
Exploring a Makeup Support System for Transgender Passing based on Automatic Gender Recognition
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsHow to handle gender with machine learning is a controversial topic. A growing critical body of research brought attention to the numerous issues transgender communities face with the adoption of current automatic gender recognition (AGR) systems. In ...
Gender identity and sexual orientation perceived oppressions in digital systems user interfaces: an exploratory study
IHC '15: Proceedings of the 14th Brazilian Symposium on Human Factors in Computing SystemsBoosted by feminist movements, research in HCI has been covering more about gender and sexuality. However, few studies are dedicated to the experience of lesbian, bisexual, gay and transgender people (LGBT). There is also little formulation regarding ...
The role of theory in gender and information systems research
In response to claims emanating from recent assessments of the status of gender and IS research about insufficient theorizing of gender, a critical literature analysis of research papers on the topic of gender and IS that appeared in information systems ...
Comments