Joanna Bergström
Tor-Salve Dalsgaard
ABSTRACT
The VR community has introduced many object selection and manipulation techniques during the past two decades. Typically, they are empirically studied to establish their benefits over the state-of-the-art. However, the literature contains few guidelines on how to conduct such studies; standards developed for evaluating 2D interaction often do not apply. This lack of guidelines makes it hard to compare techniques across studies, to report evaluations consistently, and therefore to accumulate or replicate findings. To build such guidelines, we review 20 years of studies on VR object selection and manipulation. Based on the review, we propose recommendations for designing studies and a checklist for reporting them. We also identify research directions for improving evaluation methods and offer ideas for how to make studies more ecologically valid and rigorous.
Supplemental Material
Available for Download
- Ferran Argelaguet and Carlos Andujar. 2013. A survey of 3D object selection techniques for virtual environments. Computers & Graphics 37, 3 (2013), 121–136.Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Ferran Argelaguet, Carlos Andujar, and Ramon Trueba. 2008. Overcoming eye-hand visibility mismatch in 3D pointing selection. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST (2008), 43–46. https://doi.org/10.1145/1450579.1450588Google ScholarDigital Library
- Oscar Ariza, Gerd Bruder, Nicholas Katzakis, and Frank Steinicke. 2018. Analysis of Proximity-Based Multimodal Feedback for 3D Selection in Immersive Virtual Environments. 25th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, VR 2018 - Proceedings (2018), 327–334. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8446317Google ScholarCross Ref
- Marc Baloup, Thomas Pietrzak, and Géry Casiez. 2019. RayCursor: A 3D Pointing Facilitation Technique based on Raycasting. (2019), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300331Google ScholarDigital Library
- Louise Barkhuus and Jennifer A Rode. 2007. From mice to men-24 years of evaluation in CHI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol. 10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Anil Ufuk Batmaz and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2019. Effects of 3d rotational jitter and selection methods on 3d pointing tasks. 26th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, VR 2019 - Proceedings (2019), 1687–1692. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798038Google ScholarCross Ref
- Benjamin B Bederson, Benjamin B Bederson, Ben Shneiderman, 2003. The craft of information visualization: readings and reflections. Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
- Bobby Bodenheimer, Sarah Creem-Regehr, Jeanine Stefanucci, Elena Shemetova, and William B. Thompson. 2017. Prism aftereffects for throwing with a self-avatar in an immersive virtual environment. Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality 0 (2017), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2017.7892241Google ScholarCross Ref
- Doug Bowman, Ernst Kruijff, Joseph J LaViola Jr, and Ivan P Poupyrev. 2004. 3D user interfaces: Theory and Practice(1 ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional.Google Scholar
- Doug A Bowman, Donald B Johnson, and Larry F Hodges. 2001. Testbed evaluation of virtual environment interaction techniques. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 10, 1(2001), 75–95.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Doug A Bowman, Ernst Kruijff, Joseph J LaViola Jr, and Ivan Poupyrev. 2001. An introduction to 3-D user interface design. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 10, 1(2001), 96–108.Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Brickler, Matias Volonte, Jeffrey W. Bertrand, Andrew T. Duchowski, and Sabarish V. Babu. 2019. Effects of stereoscopic viewing and haptic feedback, sensory-motor congruence and calibration on near-field fine motor perception-action coordination in virtual reality. 26th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, VR 2019 - Proceedings (2019), 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797744Google ScholarCross Ref
- John Brooke. 1996. SUS: A ’Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale. Usability evaluation in industry(1996), 189. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781498710411-35Google ScholarCross Ref
- Michael D Byrne, Bonnie E John, Neil S Wehrle, and David C Crow. 1999. The tangled web we wove: A taskonomy of WWW use. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 544–551.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kelly Caine. 2016. Local Standards for Sample Size at CHI. In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (San Jose, California, USA) (CHI ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 981–992. https://doi.org/10.1145/2858036.2858498Google ScholarDigital Library
- Stuart K Card, Thomas P Moran, and Allen Newell. 1983. The psychology of human-computer interaction. 1983.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Emmanuelle Chapoulie, Maud Marchal, Evanthia Dimara, Maria Roussou, Jean Christophe Lombardo, and George Drettakis. 2014. Evaluation of direct manipulation using finger tracking for complex tasks in an immersive cube. Virtual Reality 18, 3 (2014), 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-014-0246-0Google ScholarDigital Library
- Olivier Chapuis, Renaud Blanch, and Michel Beaudouin-Lafon. 2007. Fitts’ law in the wild: A field study of aimed movements. (2007).Google Scholar
- Andy Cockburn and Bruce J. McKenzie. 2001. What do web users do? An empirical analysis of web use. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 54, 6 (2001), 903–922. https://doi.org/10.1006/ijhc.2001.0459Google ScholarDigital Library
- Nguyen-Thong Dang. 2007. A survey and classification of 3D pointing techniques. In 2007 IEEE international conference on research, innovation and vision for the future. IEEE, 71–80.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Henrique G. Debarba, Sami Perrin, Bruno Herbelin, and Ronan Boulic. 2015. Embodied interaction using non-planar projections in immersive virtual reality. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST 13-15-November-2015 (2015), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1145/2821592.2821603Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah A Douglas, Arthur E Kirkpatrick, and I Scott MacKenzie. 1999. Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO 9241, Part 9 standard. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 215–222.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Gregory W. Edwards, Woodrow Barfield, and Maury A. Nussbaum. 2004. The use of force feedback and auditory cues for performance of an assembly task in an immersive virtual environment. Virtual Reality 7, 2 (2004), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-004-0120-6Google ScholarDigital Library
- Paul M Fitts. 1954. The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement.Journal of Experimental Psychology 47, 6 (1954), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0055392Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cédric Fleury, Thierry Duval, Valérie Gouranton, and Anthony Steed. 2012. Evaluation of remote collaborative manipulation for scientific data analysis. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST (2012), 129–136. https://doi.org/10.1145/2407336.2407361Google ScholarDigital Library
- Scott Frees and G. Drew Kessler. 2005. Precise and rapid interaction through scaled manipulation in immersive virtual environments. Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality 2005 (2005), 99–106. https://doi.org/10.1109/vr.2005.60Google ScholarDigital Library
- Eg Su Goh, Mohd Shahrizal Sunar, and Ajune Wanis Ismail. 2019. 3D object manipulation techniques in handheld mobile augmented reality interface: A review. IEEE Access 7(2019), 40581–40601.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mar Gonzalez-Franco and Tabitha C. Peck. 2018. Avatar Embodiment. Towards a Standardized Questionnaire. Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5 (2018), 74. https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2018.00074Google ScholarCross Ref
- Jan Gugenheimer, David Dobbelstein, Christian Winkler, Gabriel Haas, and Enrico Rukzio. 2016. FaceTouch: Enabling Touch Interaction in Display Fixed UIs for Mobile Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 29th Annual Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (Tokyo, Japan) (UIST ’16). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1145/2984511.2984576Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chris Hand. 1997. A survey of 3D interaction techniques. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 16. Wiley Online Library, 269–281.Google Scholar
- Sandra G. Hart and Lowell E. Staveland. 1988. Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research. In Human Mental Workload, Peter A. Hancock and Najmedin Meshkati (Eds.). Advances in Psychology, Vol. 52. North-Holland, 139 – 183. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-4115(08)62386-9Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rorik Henrikson, Tovi Grossman, Sean Trowbridge, Daniel Wigdor, and Hrvoje Benko. 2020. Head-Coupled Kinematic Template Matching: A Prediction Model for Ray Pointing in VR. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kasper Hornbæk. 2006. Current practice in measuring usability: Challenges to usability studies and research. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 (02 2006), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2005.06.002Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kasper Hornbæk, Søren S Sander, Javier Andrés Bargas-Avila, and Jakob Grue Simonsen. 2014. Is once enough? On the extent and content of replications in human-computer interaction. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 3523–3532.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jacek Jankowski and Martin Hachet. 2015. Advances in interaction with 3D environments. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 34. Wiley Online Library, 152–190.Google Scholar
- Robert S. Kennedy, Norman E. Lane, Kevin S. Berbaum, and Michael G. Lilienthal. 1993. Simulator Sickness Questionnaire: An Enhanced Method for Quantifying Simulator Sickness. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3, 3 (1993), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327108ijap0303_3Google ScholarCross Ref
- Panayiotis Koutsabasis and Panagiotis Vogiatzidakis. 2019. Empirical research in mid-air interaction: A systematic review. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 35, 18(2019), 1747–1768.Google Scholar
- Joseph J LaViola Jr, Ernst Kruijff, Ryan P McMahan, Doug Bowman, and Ivan P Poupyrev. 2017. 3D user interfaces: theory and practice(2 ed.). Addison-Wesley Professional.Google Scholar
- Jaeyeon Lee, Mike Sinclair, Mar Gonzalez-Franco, Eyal Ofek, and Christian Holz. 2019. TORC: A virtual reality controller for in-hand high-dexterity finger interaction. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings (2019), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300301Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sangyoon Lee, Jinseok Seo, Gerard Jounghyun Kim, and Chan-Mo Park. 2003. Evaluation of pointing techniques for ray casting selection in virtual environments. In Third international conference on virtual reality and its application in industry, Vol. 4756. International Society for Optics and Photonics, 38–44.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nianlong Li, Teng Han, Feng Tian, Jin Huang, Minghui Sun, Pourang Irani, and Jason Alexander. 2020. Get a Grip: Evaluating Grip Gestures for VR Input using a Lightweight Pen. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Klemen Lilija, Henning Pohl, and Kasper Hornbæk. 2020. Who Put That There? Temporal Navigation of Spatial Recordings by Direct Manipulation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–11.Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. W. Lindeman, J. L. Sibert, and J. N. Templeman. 2001. The effect of 3D widget representation and simulated surface constraints on interaction in virtual environments. Proceedings - Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium (2001), 141–148. https://doi.org/10.1109/vr.2001.913780Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mayra Donaji Barrera Machuca and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2019. The effect of stereo display deficiencies on virtual hand pointing. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings. Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300437Google ScholarDigital Library
- I. Scott MacKenzie. 1992. Fitts’ Law as a Research and Design Tool in Human-Computer Interaction. Human–Computer Interaction 7, 1 (1992), 91–139. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327051hci0701_3Google ScholarDigital Library
- I Scott MacKenzie and R William Soukoreff. 2003. Phrase sets for evaluating text entry techniques. In CHI’03 extended abstracts on Human factors in computing systems. 754–755.Google Scholar
- Diako Mardanbegi, Benedikt Mayer, Ken Pfeuffer, Shahram Jalaliniya, Hans Gellersen, and Alexander Perzl. 2019. EyeSeeThrough: Unifying tool selection and application in virtual environments. 26th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, VR 2019 - Proceedings (2019), 474–483. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8797988Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alejandro Martin-Gomez, Ulrich Eck, and Nassir Navab. 2019. Visualization techniques for precise alignment in VR: A comparative study. 26th IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces, VR 2019 - Proceedings (2019), 735–741. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2019.8798135Google ScholarCross Ref
- Antonella Maselli and Mel Slater. 2013. The building blocks of the full body ownership illusion. Frontiers in human neuroscience 7 (2013), 83.Google Scholar
- Sven Mayer, Valentin Schwind, Robin Schweigert, and Niels Henze. 2018. The effect of offset correction and cursor on mid-air Pointing in real and virtual environments. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings 2018-April (2018), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174227Google ScholarDigital Library
- Joseph E McGrath. 1995. Methodology matters: Doing research in the behavioral and social sciences. In Readings in Human–Computer Interaction. Elsevier, 152–169.Google Scholar
- Daniel Mendes, Fabio Marco Caputo, Andrea Giachetti, Alfredo Ferreira, and J Jorge. 2019. A survey on 3D virtual object manipulation: From the desktop to immersive virtual environments. In Computer graphics forum, Vol. 38. Wiley Online Library, 21–45.Google Scholar
- Daniel Mendes, Filipe Relvas, Alfredo Ferreira, and Joaquim Jorge. 2016. The Benefits of DOF Separation in Mid-air 3D Object Manipulation. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST 02-04-November-2016 (2016), 261–268. https://doi.org/10.1145/2993369.2993396Google ScholarDigital Library
- Daniel Mendes, Maurício Sousa, Rodrigo Lorena, Alfredo Ferreira, and Joaquim Jorge. 2017. Using custom transformation axes for mid-air manipulation of 3D virtual objects. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST Part F131944(2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3139131.3139157Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mathias Moehring and Bernd Froehlich. 2011. Effective manipulation of virtual objects within arm’s reach. Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality(2011), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2011.5759451Google ScholarDigital Library
- David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman, Prisma Group, 2009. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS med 6, 7 (2009), e1000097.Google Scholar
- Roberto A. Montano Murillo, Sriram Subramanian, and Diego Martinez Plasencia. 2017. Erg-O: Ergonomic optimization of immersive virtual environments. UIST 2017 - Proceedings of the 30th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(2017), 759–771. https://doi.org/10.1145/3126594.3126605Google ScholarDigital Library
- Aske Mottelson and Kasper Hornbæk. 2017. Virtual reality studies outside the laboratory. In Proceedings of the 23rd acm symposium on virtual reality software and technology. 1–10.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yun Suen Pai, Tilman Dingler, and Kai Kunze. 2019. Assessing hands-free interactions for VR using eye gaze and electromyography. Virtual Reality 23, 2 (2019), 119–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-018-0371-2Google ScholarDigital Library
- Soonchan Park, Seokyeol Kim, and Jinah Park. 2012. Select Ahead: Efficient object selection technique using tendency of recent cursor movements. APCHI’12 - Proceedings of the 2012 Asia Pacific Conference on Computer-Human Interaction (2012), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/2350046.2350060Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vijay M. Pawar and Anthony Steed. 2009. Evaluating the influence of haptic Force-Feedback on 3d selection tasks using natural egocentric gestures. Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality(2009), 11–18. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2009.4810992Google ScholarDigital Library
- Vijay M. Pawar and Anthony Steed. 2009. Profiling the behaviour of 3D selection tasks on movement time when using natural haptic pointing gestures. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST (2009), 79–82. https://doi.org/10.1145/1643928.1643947Google ScholarDigital Library
- Alex Peer and Kevin Ponto. 2019. Mitigating Incorrect Perception of Distance in Virtual Reality through Personalized Rendering Manipulation. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 244–250.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Etienne Peillard, Thomas Thebaud, Jean-Marie Norrnand, Ferran Argelaguet, Guillaume Moreau, and Anatole Lécuyer. 2019. Virtual Objects Look Farther on the Sides: The Anisotropy of Distance Perception in Virtual Reality. In 2019 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 227–236.Google Scholar
- Duc Minh Pham and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2019. Is the pen mightier than the controller? A comparison of input devices for selection in virtual and augmented reality. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3359996.3364264Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ivan Poupyrev, Suzanne Weghorst, Mark Billinghurst, and Tadao Ichikawa. 1997. A framework and testbed for studying manipulation techniques for immersive VR. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology. 21–28.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Yuan Yuan Qian and Robert J Teather. 2017. The eyes don’t have it: an empirical comparison of head-based and eye-based selection in virtual reality. In Proceedings of the 5th Symposium on Spatial User Interaction. 91–98.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ludwig Sidenmark, Christopher Clarke, Xuesong Zhang, Jenny Phu, and Hans Gellersen. 2020. Outline Pursuits: Gaze-assisted Selection of Occluded Objects in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–13.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Ludwig Sidenmark and Hans Gellersen. 2019. Eye & Head: Synergetic eye and head movement for gaze pointing and selection. UIST 2019 - Proceedings of the 32nd Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology(2019), 1161–1174. https://doi.org/10.1145/3332165.3347921Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mel Slater, Martin Usoh, and Anthony Steed. 1994. Depth of Presence in Immersive Virtual Environments. Teleoperators and Virtual Environments - Presence 3 (01 1994).Google Scholar
- R. William Soukoreff and I. Scott MacKenzie. 2004. Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts’ law research in HCI. International journal of human-computer studies 61, 6 (2004), 751–789.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Marco Speicher, Anna Maria Feit, Pascal Ziegler, and Antonio Krüger. 2018. Selection-based text entry In Virtual Reality. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings, Vol. 2018-April. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174221Google ScholarDigital Library
- Frank Steinicke and Gerd Bruder. 2014. A self-experimentation report about long-term use of fully-immersive technology. In Proceedings of the 2nd ACM symposium on Spatial user interaction. 66–69.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rasmus Stenholt. 2012. Efficient selection of multiple objects on a large scale. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST (2012), 105–112. https://doi.org/10.1145/2407336.2407357Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wolfgang Stuerzlinger and Robert J Teather. 2014. Considerations for targets in 3D pointing experiments. Proceedings of HCI Korea(2014), 162–168.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Youssef S Tanagho, Gerald L Andriole, Alethea G Paradis, Kerry M Madison, Gurdarshan S Sandhu, J Esteban Varela, and Brian M Benway. 2012. 2D versus 3D visualization: impact on laparoscopic proficiency using the fundamentals of laparoscopic surgery skill set. Journal of Laparoendoscopic & Advanced Surgical Techniques 22, 9(2012), 865–870.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Robert J Teather and Wolfgang Stuerzlinger. 2011. Pointing at 3D targets in a stereo head-tracked virtual environment. In 2011 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces (3DUI). IEEE, 87–94.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tanh Quang Tran, Hyun Ju Shin, Wolfgang Stuerzlinger, and Jung Hyun Han. 2017. Effects of virtual arm representations on interaction in virtual environments. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST Part F131944(2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3139131.3139149Google ScholarDigital Library
- Huawei Tu, Susu Huang, Jiabin Yuan, Xiangshi Ren, and Feng Tian. 2019. Crossing-based selection with virtual reality head-mounted displays. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings(CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300848Google ScholarDigital Library
- Manuel Veit, Antonio Capobianco, and Dominique Bechmann. 2009. Influence of degrees of freedom’s manipulation on performances during orientation tasks in virtual reality environments. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST 1, 212 (2009), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1643928.1643942Google ScholarDigital Library
- Keith Vertanen and Per Ola Kristensson. 2011. A versatile dataset for text entry evaluations based on genuine mobile emails. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. 295–298.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jia Wang and Robert W. Lindeman. 2015. Object impersonation: Towards effective interaction in tablet- and HMD-based hybrid virtual environments. 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2015 - Proceedings (2015), 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2015.7223332Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alan Traviss Welford. 1968. Fundamentals of skill.(1968).Google Scholar
- Johann Wentzel, Greg d’Eon, and Daniel Vogel. 2020. Improving Virtual Reality Ergonomics Through Reach-Bounded Non-Linear Input Amplification. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–12.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Steve Whittaker, Loren Terveen, and Bonnie A Nardi. 2000. Let’s stop pushing the envelope and start addressing it: a reference task agenda for HCI. Human–Computer Interaction 15, 2-3 (2000), 75–106.Google Scholar
- Curtis Wilkes and Doug A. Bowman. 2008. Advantages of velocity-based scaling for distant 3D manipulation. Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology, VRST (2008), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/1450579.1450585Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chadwick A. Wingrave, Ryan Tintner, Bruce N. Walker, Doug A. Bowman, and Larry F. Hodges. 2005. Exploring individual differences in raybased selection: Strategies and traits. Proceedings - IEEE Virtual Reality 2005 (2005), 163–170. https://doi.org/10.1109/vr.2005.35Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bob G. Witmer and Michael J. Singer. 1998. Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7, 3(1998), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474698565686Google ScholarDigital Library
- Jackie Yang, Hiroshi Horii, Alexander Thayer, and Rafael Ballagas. 2018. VR Grabbers: Ungrounded haptic retargeting for precision grabbing tools. In UIST 2018 - Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology. Association for Computing Machinery, Inc, 889–899. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242587.3242643Google ScholarDigital Library
- Zhong Yang, Yi Li, Yang Zheng, Weidong Chen, and Xiaoxiang Zheng. 2012. An interaction system using mixed hand gestures. In Proceedings of the 10th asia pacific conference on Computer human interaction. 125–132.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Chun Yu, Yizheng Gu, Zhican Yang, Xin Yi, Hengliang Luo, and Yuanchun Shi. 2017. Tap, Dwell or Gesture? Exploring Head-Based Text Entry Techniques for HMDs. (2017), 4479–4488. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025964Google ScholarDigital Library
- Shumin Zhai and Paul Milgram. 1993. Human performance evaluation of manipulation schemes in virtual environments. In Proceedings of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium. IEEE, 155–161.Google ScholarDigital Library
- David J. Zielinski, Hrishikesh M. Rao, Mark A. Sommer, and Regis Kopper. 2015. Exploring the effects of image persistence in low frame rate virtual environments. 2015 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference, VR 2015 - Proceedings (2015), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2015.7223319Google ScholarCross Ref
- Tim Zindulka, Myroslav Bachynskyi, and Jörg Müller. 2020. Performance and Experience of Throwing in Virtual Reality. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–8.Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- How to Evaluate Object Selection and Manipulation in VR? Guidelines from 20 Years of Studies
Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.
Recommendations
Fingertip Tactile Devices for Virtual Object Manipulation and Exploration
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsOne of the main barriers to immersivity during object manipulation in virtual reality is the lack of realistic haptic feedback. Our goal is to convey compelling interactions with virtual objects, such as grasping, squeezing, pressing, lifting, and ...
VR Grabbers: Ungrounded Haptic Retargeting for Precision Grabbing Tools
UIST '18: Proceedings of the 31st Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and TechnologyHaptic feedback in VR is important for realistic simulation in virtual reality. However, recreating the haptic experience for hand tools in VR traditionally requires hardware with precise actuators, adding complexity to the system. We propose Ungrounded ...
Can Haptic Feedback on One Virtual Object Increase the Presence of Another Virtual Object?
VRST '22: Proceedings of the 28th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and TechnologyThis paper investigated whether increased presence from experiencing haptic feedback on one virtual object can transfer to another virtual object. Two similar studies were run in different environments: an immersive virtual environment and a mixed ...
Comments