Abstract
A “percent-done progress indicator” is a graphical technique which allows the user to monitor the progress through the processing of a task. Progress indicators can be displayed on almost all types of output devices, and can be used with many different kinds of programs. Practical experience and formal experiments show that prograss indicators are an important and useful user-interface tool, and that they enhance the attractiveness and effectiveness of programs that incorporate them. This paper discusses why progress indicators are important. It includes the results of a formal experiment with progress indicators. One part of the experiment demonstrates that people prefer to have progress indicators. Another part attempted to replicate earlier findings to show that people prefer constant to variable response time in general, and then to show that this effect is reversed with progress indicators, but the results were not statistically significant. In fact, no significant preference for constant response time was shown, contrary to previously published results.
- Carbonelle, Jaime, Elkind, Jerome I., and Nickerson, Raymond S. (1968). On the Psychological Importance of Time in a Time Sharing System. Human Factors 10(2), April 1968. 135-142.Google Scholar
- Foley, James D. (1974). The Art of Natural Graphic Man-Machine Conversation. Proceedings of the 1EEE 62(4), April 1974. 462-471.Google Scholar
- Miller, Lawrence H. (1977). A Stuc~y in Man-Machine Interaction. Proceedings of the National Computer Conference 46. AFIPS Press, 1977. 409-421.Google Scholar
- Miller, Robert B. (1968). Response Time in Man- Computer Conversational Transactions. Proceedings Fall Joint Computer Conference 33(part 1). AFIPS Press, 1968. 267-277.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Myers, Brad A. (1983). Incense: A System for Displaying Data Structures. Computer Graphics" SIG- GRAPH '83 Conference Proceedings 17(3), July 1983. 115-125. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Myers, Brad A. (1984). The User Interface for Sapphire: A Screen Allocation Package Providing Helpful Icons and Rectangular Environments. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 4(I2), December 1984. 13-23.Google Scholar
- PERQ POS Operating System Manual. (1983). PERQ System Software Reference Manual, POS Version G3. PERO Systems Corporation, Pittsburgh, PA. May 1983.Google Scholar
- Pike, Rob. (1983). Graphics in Overlapping Bitmap Layers. ACM Transactions on Graphics. 2(2), April 1983. 135-160. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rashid, R. and Robertson, G. (1981). Accent: A Communication Oriented Network Operating System Kernel. Proceedings of the 8th Symposium on Operating Systems Principles. Asilomar, CA, December 1981.64-75. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Rosen, Brian. (1980). PERQ: A Commercially Available Personal Scientific Computer. IEEE Comp- Con Digest. Spring 1980.Google Scholar
- SAS. (1984). The Statistical Analysis System, Release 82.4. SAS Institute Inc. SAS Circle, PO Box 8000, Cary, N.C. 27511-8000.Google Scholar
- Spence, Robert. (1976). Human Factors in Interactive Graphics. Computer Aided Design g(l), January 1976.49-53.Google Scholar
- Weisberg, David E. (1984). The Impact of Network System Architecture on CAD/CAM Productivity. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 4(8), August 1984. 36-40.Google Scholar
- Williams, Gregg. (1984). The Apple Macintosh Computer. Byte Magazine. 9(2), February 1984. 30-54.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- The importance of percent-done progress indicators for computer-human interfaces
Recommendations
The importance of percent-done progress indicators for computer-human interfaces
CHI '85: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsA “percent-done progress indicator” is a graphical technique which allows the user to monitor the progress through the processing of a task. Progress indicators can be displayed on almost all types of output devices, and can be used with many different ...
IT Progress Indicators: Sense of Progress, Subjective Sense of Time, User Preference and the Perception of Process Duration
Users of information technology (IT) often encounter "progress indicators" during their interactions. These graphics (e.g., progress bars) appear on computing screens as users wait for a task to complete. The purpose of progress indicators is to inform ...
The impact of progress indicators on task completion
A near ubiquitous feature of user interfaces is feedback on task completion or progress indicators such as the graphical bar that grows as more of the task is completed. The presumed benefit is that users will be more likely to complete the task if they ...
Comments