skip to main content
10.1145/1357054.1357123acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The LilyPad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education

Authors Info & Claims
Published:06 April 2008Publication History

ABSTRACT

The advent of novel materials (such as conductive fibers) combined with accessible embedded computing platforms have made it possible to re-imagine the landscapes of fabric and electronic crafts--extending these landscapes with the creative range of electronic/computational textiles or e-textiles. This paper describes the LilyPad Arduino, a fabric-based construction kit that enables novices to design and build their own soft wearables and other textile artifacts. The kit consists of a microcontroller and an assortment of sensors and actuators in stitch-able packages; these elements can be sewn to cloth substrates and each other with conductive thread to build e-textiles. This paper will introduce the latest version of the kit; reflect on its affordances; present the results of our most recent user studies; and discuss possible directions for future work in the area of personalized e-textile design and its relation to technology education.

References

  1. Arduino. Available: www.arduino.cc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Berzowska, J. Electronic textiles: Wearable computers, reactive fashion, and soft computation. Textile, 3(1):2--19, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Buechley, L. A construction kit for electronic textiles. In Proceedings of ISWC, pp 83--90, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Buechley, L. and Eisenberg, M. Fabric PCBs, electronic sequins, and socket buttons: Techniques for e-textile craft. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 2007 (available online, print version pending). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Buechley, L., Eisenberg, M. and Elumeze, N. Towards a curriculum for electronic textiles in the high-school classroom. In Proceedings of ITiCSE, pp 28--32, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., and Whalen, S. Talented Teenagers. Cambridge University Press, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Davis, F. Fashion, Culture, and Identity. University of Chicago Press, 1992.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Galluzzi, P. The Art of Invention: Leonardo and the Renaissance Engineers. Giunti, Italy, 1999.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Hartmann, B. et al. Reflective physical prototyping through integrated design, test, and analysis. In Proceedings of UIST, pp 299--308, 2006. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Igoe, T. Making Things Talk. O'Reilly, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Margolis, J. and Fisher, A. Unlocking the Clubhouse. MIT Press, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. National Center for Women and Information Technology. Statistics about Women and IT. Available: www.ncwit.org/what. publication.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Papert, S. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas. Basic Books, Inc., New York, NY, USA, 1980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Post, R. et al. E-broidery: design and fabrication of textile-based computing. IBM Systems Journal, 39(3-4):840--860, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Resnick, M. Computer as paintbrush: Technology, play, and the creative society. In D. Singer, R. Golikoff, and K Hirsh-Pasek, editors, Play = Learning: How play motivates and enhances children's cognitive and social-emotional growth. Oxford University Press, 2006.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Resnick, M., Bruckman, A., and Martin, F. Pianos not stereos: creating computational construction kits. Interactions, 3(5):40--50, 1996. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Rich, L., Perry, H. and Guzdial, M. A CS1 course designed to address the interests of women. In Proceedings of SIGCSE, pp 190--194, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Tai, R. et al. Planning early for careers in science. Science, 312:1143--1144, May 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. University of Colorado, office of planning, budget and analysis. College of Engineering statistics. Available: http://www.colorado.edu/pba/div/femalebycol.htm.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The LilyPad Arduino: using computational textiles to investigate engagement, aesthetics, and diversity in computer science education

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Login options

            Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

            Sign in
            • Published in

              cover image ACM Conferences
              CHI '08: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
              April 2008
              1870 pages
              ISBN:9781605580111
              DOI:10.1145/1357054

              Copyright © 2008 ACM

              Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

              Publisher

              Association for Computing Machinery

              New York, NY, United States

              Publication History

              • Published: 6 April 2008

              Permissions

              Request permissions about this article.

              Request Permissions

              Check for updates

              Qualifiers

              • research-article

              Acceptance Rates

              CHI '08 Paper Acceptance Rate157of714submissions,22%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

            PDF Format

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader