skip to main content
10.1145/1518701.1518835acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Ethnography considered harmful

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 April 2009Publication History

ABSTRACT

We review the current status of ethnography in systems design. We focus particularly on new approaches to and understandings of ethnography that have emerged as the computer has moved out of the workplace. These seek to implement a different order of ethnographic study to that which has largely been employed in design to date. In doing so they reconfigure the relationship ethnography has to systems design, replacing detailed empirical studies of situated action with studies that provide cultural interpretations of action and critiques of the design process itself. We hold these new approaches to and understandings of ethnography in design up to scrutiny, with the purpose of enabling designers to appreciate the differences between new and existing approaches to ethnography in systems design and the practical implications this might have for design.

Skip Supplemental Material Section

Supplemental Material

References

  1. Benford, S. et al. (2006) "The frame of the game, Proc. CHI '06, pp. 427--436, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Bell, G. (2001) "Looking across the Atlantic: using ethnographic methods to make sense of Europe, Intel Technology Journal Q3.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Bell, G. (2003) Other homes, Proc. CHI '03 (Workshop 14, Session 3), ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Bell, G. et al. (2003) Designing culturally situated technologies for the home, Proc. CHI '03, pp. 1062--1063, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Bell, G., Blythe, M. and Sengers, P. (2005) Making by making strange, ACM ToCHI, vol. 12 (2), pp. 149--173. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bell, G. and Dourish, P. (2006)"Back to the shed, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, vol. 11 (5), pp. 373--381. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Blythe, M. (2007)"The digital music box, Proc. CHI '07, pp. 2297--2302, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Boehner, K. et al. (2005) Critical technical practice as a methodology for values in design, Proc. CHI '05 (Workshop 9), ACM.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Boehner, K., Vertesi, J., Sengers, P. and Dourish, P. (2007) How HCI interprets probes, Proc. CHI '07, pp. 1077--1086, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Button, G. (2000)"The ethnographic tradition and design, Design Studies, vol. 21, 319--332.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Button, G. and Harper, R. (1996) The relevance of 'work-practice' for design, CSCW Journal, vol. 4 (4), pp. 263--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Crabtree, A. et al. (2000)"Ethnomethodologically-informed ethnography in information systems design, JASIS, vol. 51 (7), pp. 666--682. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Crabtree, A. et al. (2004) Orchestrating a mixed reality game 'on the ground', Proc. CHI '04, pp. 391--398, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  14. Crabtree, A., et al. (2005)"Moving with the times, CSCW Journal, vol. 14 (3), pp. 217--251. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Garfinkel, H. (1967) Studies in Ethnomethodology, Prentice-Hall.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Garfinkel, H. (ed.) (1986) Ethnomethodological Studies of Work, Routledge&Kegan Paul.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gaver, W., Dunne, T. and Pacenti, E. (1999) Cultural probes, ACM Interactions, vol. 6 (1), pp. 21--29. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gaver, W. et al. (2004)"Cultural probes and the value of uncertainty, Interactions, vol. 11 (5), pp. 53--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Greenbaum, J. and Kyng, M. (eds.) (1991) Design at Work: Cooperative Design of Computer Systems, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  20. Greenberg, S. and Buxton, B. (2008)"Usability evaluation considered harmful, Proc. CHI '08, pp. 111--120, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hughes, J., Randall, D. and Shapiro, D. (1992)"Faltering from ethnography to design, Proc. CSCW '92, pp. 115--122, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hughes, J., Randall, D. and Shapiro, D. (1993) From ethnographic record to system design, CSCW Journal, vol. 1 (3), pp. 123--141.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. Lynch, M. (2000)"Against reflexivity as an academic virtue and source of privileged knowledge, Theory, Culture and Society, vol. 17 (3), pp. 26--54.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Plaice, E. (2003) Comment on Adam Kuper's 'The Return of the Native', Current Anthropology, vol. 44 (3), pp. 396--397.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Plowman, L., Rogers, Y. and Ramage, M. (1995)"What are workplace studies for?, Proc. CSCW '95, pp. 309--324, Kluwer. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Ryle, G. (1971) The Thinking of Thoughts, University Lectures No. 18, University of Saskatchewan.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Sacks, H. (1963) Sociological description, Berkeley Journal of Sociology, vol. 8, pp. 1--16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Sacks, H. (1984) Notes on methodology, Structures of Social Action (eds. Maxwell, J. and Heritage, J.), pp. 21--27, Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Sacks, H. (1992) A single instance of a phone-call opening, Lectures on Conversation, pp. 542--553, Blackwell.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Sengers, P., Kaye, J., Boehner, K., Fairbank, J., Gay, G., Medynskiy, Y. and Wyche, S. (2004)"Culturally embedded computing, IEEE Pervasive Computing, January-March, pp. 14--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S. and Kaye, J. (2005) Reflective design, Proc. 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing, pp. 49--58, Aarhus, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Suchman, L. (1983)"Office procedures as practical action, ACM Transactions on Office Information Systems, vol. 1 (4), pp. 320--328. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Suchman, L. (1987) Plans and Situated Actions, Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Tolmie, P., Crabtree, A., Greenhalgh, C., Rodden, T. and Benford, S. (2007) Making the home network at home, Proc. ECSCW '07, pp. 331--350, Springer.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Venkatesh, A. (1985) A conceptualisation of household-technology interaction, Advances in Consumer Research, vol. 12, pp. 189--194.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Weiser, M. (1991) The computer for the 21st Century, Scientific American, vol. 265 (3), pp. 94--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. Weiser, M. (1996) Ubiquitous Computing, http://sandbox.xerox.com/ubicomp/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Wyche, S., Medynskiy, Y. and Grinter, R. (2007)"Exploring the use of large displays in American megachurches, Proc. CHI '07, pp. 2771--2776, ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Ethnography considered harmful

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '09: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2009
      2426 pages
      ISBN:9781605582467
      DOI:10.1145/1518701

      Copyright © 2009 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 4 April 2009

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '09 Paper Acceptance Rate277of1,130submissions,25%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader