skip to main content
research-article

Experimental evaluation of an educational game for improved learning in introductory computing

Authors Info & Claims
Published:04 March 2009Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We are developing games to increase student learning and attitudes in introductory CS courses. Wu's Castle is a game where students program changes in loops and arrays in an interactive, visual way. The game provides immediate feedback and helps students visualize code execution in a safe environment. We compared the game to a traditional programming assignment in an introductory CS course. In our study, half of the students were randomly selected to play the learning game first and half to write a program first. Our results show that students who play our learning game first outperform those who write a program before playing the game. Students in the game-first group felt they spent less time on the assignments, and all students preferred the learning game over the program. These results suggest that games like Wu's Castle can help prepare students to create deeper, more robust understanding of computing concepts while improving their perceptions of computing homework assignments.

References

  1. Barnes, T., H. Richter, E. Powell, A. Chaffin, A. Godwin. Game2Learn: Building CS1 learning games for retention. ITiCSE 2007, Dundee, Scotland, June 25--27, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Beauboeuf, T & J. Mason. Why the high attrition rate for computer science students: some thoughts and observations. SIGCSE Bull. 37, 2 (Jun. 2005), 103--106. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  3. Dale, N. B. Most difficult topics in CS1: results of an online survey of educators. SIGCSE Bull. 38, 2 (2006), 49--53. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Eagle, M. & T. Barnes. Wu's Castle: Teaching Arrays and Loops in a Game. ITiCSE 2008. Madrid, Spain, July 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Gee, J. P. What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Comput. Entertain. 1, 1 (Oct. 2003), 20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Hunicke, R., Robison, A., Squire, K., and Steinkuehler, C. Games, learning and literacy. Sandbox 2006. ACM Press, New York, NY, 19--19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Lister, R. 2000. On blooming first year programming, and its blooming assessment. In Proc. Australasian Conference on Computing Education (Melbourne, Australia). A. E. Ellis, Ed. ACSE '00, vol. 8. ACM, New York, NY, 158--162. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Squire, K. (2003). Video games in education. International Journal of Intelligent Simulations and Gaming, vol. 2, 49--62.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Wilson, B. and Shrock, S. Contributing to success in an introductory iomputer science course: A study of 12 factors. SIGCSE 2001. ACM Press, New York, NY, p. 184--188. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Zweben, S. 2006-2007 Taulbee Survey. Computing Research News, vol. 20, no. 3, May 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Experimental evaluation of an educational game for improved learning in introductory computing

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in

          Full Access

          • Published in

            cover image ACM SIGCSE Bulletin
            ACM SIGCSE Bulletin  Volume 41, Issue 1
            SIGCSE '09
            March 2009
            553 pages
            ISSN:0097-8418
            DOI:10.1145/1539024
            Issue’s Table of Contents
            • cover image ACM Conferences
              SIGCSE '09: Proceedings of the 40th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
              March 2009
              612 pages
              ISBN:9781605581835
              DOI:10.1145/1508865

            Copyright © 2009 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 4 March 2009

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader