Maaike Roubroeks
ABSTRACT
Nowadays, many advertising campaigns attempt to persuade people to perform a specific behavior. In response to such messages, people can comply and adapt their behavior in the proposed direction. However, people can also experience psychological reactance, which may lead to the complete opposite of the target behavior. In the present study, we were interested in the social nature of psychological reactance. According to Social Agency Theory [12], more social cues lead to more social interaction. We suggest that this also holds for psychological reactance. We argue that there is a positive relation between the level of social agency of the source of a message and the level of psychological reactance that this message can arouse. In an online study, participants received low-controlling or high-controlling advice about energy conservation. This advice was delivered either solely as text, as text with a still picture of a robotic agent, or as text with a brief film clip of the same robotic agent. Results showed that a high-controlling advisory message resulted in more reactance than a low-controlling advisory message. Confirming our expectancies, stronger social agency of the messenger led to more psychological reactance. Implications are discussed.
- Blascovich, J. (2002). A theoretical model of social influence for increasing the utility of collaborative virtual environments. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Collaborative Virtual Environments (pp. 25--30), Bonn: Association for Computing Machinery. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance, New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Brehm, S. S., & Brehm, J. W. (1981). Psychological reactance: A theory of freedom and control. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Buller, D. B., Borland, R., & Burgoon, M. (1998). Impact of behavioural intention on effectiveness of message features: Evidence from the family sun safety project. Human Communication Research, 24, 433--453.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1981). Social psychological procedures for cognitive response assessment: The thought-listing technique. (In T. V. Merluzzi, C. R. Glass, & M. Genest (Eds.), Cognitive assessment (pp. 309--342). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Dillard, J. P., & Peck, E. (2000). Affect and persuasion. Communication Research, 27, 461--495Google ScholarCross Ref
- Dillard, J. P., & Shen, L. (2005). On the nature of reactance and its role in persuasive health communication. Communication Monographs, 72, 144--168.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Grandpre, J., Alvaro, E. M., Burgoon, M., Miller, C. H., & Hall, J. R. (2003). Adolescent reactance and anti-smoking campaigns: A theoretical approach. Health Communication, 15, 349--366.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Guadagno, R. E., Blascovich, J., Bailenson, J. N., & McCall, C. (2007). Virtual humans and persuasion: The effect of agency and behavioral realism. Media Psychology, 10, 1--22.Google Scholar
- Hone, K. (2006). Empathic agents to reduce user frustration: The effects of varying agent characteristics. Interacting with Computers, 18, 227--245. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lusk, M. M., & Atkinson, R. K. (2007). Animated pedagogical agents: Does their degree of embodiment impact learning from static or animated worked examples? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 747--764.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Mayer, R. E., Sobko, K., & Mautone, P. D. (2003). Social cues in multimedia learning: Role of speaker's voice. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 419--425.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Miller, C. H., Lance, L. T., Deatrick, L. M., Young, A. M., & Potts, K. A. (2007). Psychological reactance and promotional health messages: The effects of controlling language, lexical concreteness, and the restoration of freedom. Human Communication Research, 33, 219--240.Google Scholar
- Quick, B. L., & Considine, J. R. (2008) Examining the Use of Forceful Language When Designing Exercise Persuasive Messages for Adults: A Test of Conceptualizing Reactance Arousal as a Two-Step Process. Health Communication, 23, 483--491.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Quick, B. L., & Stephenson, M. T. (2007). Further evidence that psychological reactance can be modelled as a combination of anger and negative cognitions. Communication Research, 34, 255--276.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Rains, S. A., & Turner, M. M. (2007). Psychological reactance and persuasive health communication: A test and extension of the intertwined model. Human Communication Research, 33, 241--269.Google Scholar
- Reeves, B., & Nass C. (2002). The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google ScholarDigital Library
Index Terms
- Does it make a difference who tells you what to do?: exploring the effect of social agency on psychological reactance
Recommendations
The dominant robot: threatening robots cause psychological reactance, especially when they have incongruent goals
PERSUASIVE'10: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Persuasive TechnologyPersuasive technology can take the form of a social agent that persuades people to change behavior or attitudes. However, like any persuasive technology, persuasive social agents might trigger psychological reactance, which can lead to restoration ...
The influence of social cues in persuasive social robots on psychological reactance and compliance
AbstractPeople can react negatively to persuasive attempts experiencing reactance, which gives rise to negative feelings and thoughts and may reduce compliance. This research examines social responses towards persuasive social agents. We ...
Highlights- More social cues cause more social responses in persuasive attempts.
- More ...
A persuasive robotic agent to save energy: the influence of social feedback, feedback valence and task similarity on energy conservation behavior
ICSR'10: Proceedings of the Second international conference on Social roboticsIn this paper we explore the persuasive effects of social feedback provided by a robotic agent, on behavioral change. In lab experiments, participants had the opportunity to conserve energy while carrying out washing tasks with a simulated washing ...
Comments