skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753464acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

One size does not fit all: applying the transtheoretical model to energy feedback technology design

Published:10 April 2010Publication History

ABSTRACT

Global warming, and the climate change it induces, is an urgent global issue. One remedy to this problem, and the focus of this paper, is to motivate sustainable energy usage behaviors by people. One approach is the development of technologies that provide real-time, continuous feedback of energy usage. However, there is one problem - most tech-nologies use a "one-size-fits-all" solution, providing the same feedback to differently motivated individuals at different stages of readiness, willingness and ableness to change. In this paper, we synthesize a wide range of motivational psychology literature to develop a motivational framework based on the Transtheoretical (aka Stages of Behavior Change) Model. For each stage, we state the mo-tivational goal(s), and recommendation(s) for how technol-ogies can reach these goals. Each goal and recommendation is supported by a rationale based on motivational literature. Each recommendation is supported by a simple textual example illustrating one way to apply the recommendation.

References

  1. Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A. (2000). Habits as knowledge structures: automaticity in goal-directed behavior. APA, 78(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Arkes, H. R. (1978). Competence and the maintenance of behavior. Motivation and Emotion, 2, 201--211.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Austin, J.T., Vancouver, J.B. (1996). Goal constructs in psychology: structure, process and content. Psyc. Bulletin, 120(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, L.J. (1978). Joint effect of feedback and goal-setting on performance: A field study of residential energy conservation. J. of Applied Psyc., 63, 428--433.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  5. Beebe, S.A., Beebe, S.J., Redmond, M.V. (1999). Interpersonal Communication: Relating to Others (2nd ed), Allyn & Bacon,.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Bem, D.J. (1967). Self-perception: an alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Pysc. Review, 74(3).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Berlyne, D.E. (1961). Conflict and the orientation reaction. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 476--483.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Blevis, E. (2007). Sustainable Interaction Design: invention and disposal, renewal and reuse. Proc. ACM CHI'07, 503--512. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Boud, D. (2001). Using journal writing to enhance reflective practice. In English, L.M.and Gillen, M.A (Eds). New Directions in Adult and Continuing Ed. No.90. Jossey-Bass, 9--18.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Cameron, L.D., Brown, P.M. (1998). Social value orientation and decisions to take proenvironmental action. J. of App. Social Pysc, 28(8).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Cialdini, R.B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Dir. in Psyc. Science, 12, 105--109.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety: The experience of play in work and games. Jossey-Bass.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. De Young, R. (1993). Changing behavior and making it stick: the conceptualization and management of conservation behavior. Environment and Behavior, 25(3), 485--505.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Deci, E.L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. of Pers. and Social Pysc. 18, 105--115.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Deci, E.L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Deci, E. L., Ryan, R.M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Deci, E.L., Betley, G., Kahle, J., Abrams, L., Porac, J. (1981). When trying to win: competition and intrinsic motivation. Per--sonality and Social Psyc. Bulletin, 7(1).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Deci, E.L., Ryan, R.M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: classic definitions and new directions. Cont. Ed. Psyc., 25.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Folz, D.H. (1991). Recycling program design, management, and participation: A national survey of municipal experience. Public Admin. Review, 51(3), 222--231.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Fritzsche, D. J. (1995). Personal values: potential keys to ethical decision making. J. of Bus. Ethics, 14(11), 909--922.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Froehlich, J. (2009). Promoting energy efficient behaviors in the home through feedback: the role of Human-Computer Interaction. HCIC '09 Workshop.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Froehlich, J., Dillahunt, T., Klasnja, P., Mankoff, J., Consolvo, S., Harrison, B., Landay, J.A. (2009). Ubigreen: investigating a mobile tool for tracking and supporting green transportation habits. Proc. ACM CHI'09, 1043--1052. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Geller, E.S., Winett, R.A., Everett, P.B. (1982). Preserving the Environment: New Strategies for Behavior Change. Pergamon Press Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. Gollwitzer, P.M. (1999). Implementation intentions: strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54, 493--503.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Gollwitzer, P.M., Brandstatter, V. (1997). Implementation intentions and effective goal pursuit. J. of Personality and Social Psyc., 73, 186--199.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. Gustafsson, A., Gyllensward, M. (2005). The power-aware cord: energy awareness through ambient information display. Proc. ACM CHI'05, 1423--1426. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Hockenbury, D.H., Hockenbury, S.E. (2003). Psychology (3rd ed.). Worth Publishers.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Holmes, T. G. (2007). Eco-visualization: combining art and technology to reduce energy consumption. Proc. of C&C'07. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Huitt, W. (2001). Motivation to Learn: An Overview. In Ed. Psyc. Interactive, Valdosta State Uni. http://chiron.valdosta.edu/whuitt/col/motivation/motivate.htmlGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. Iyengar, S.S., Lepper, M.R.(1999). Rethinking the value of choice: a cultural perspective on intrinsic motivation. J. of Personality and Social Pysc., 76(3), 349--366.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Kaplan, S. (1990). Being needed, adaptive muddling and human-environment relationships. In R.I. Selby, K.H. Anthony, J. Choi, and B. Orland (Eds), Coming of age, p19--25. Environmental Design Research Assoc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Littell J.H., Girvin, H. (2002). Stages of change: a critique. Behavior Modification, 26(2), 223--273.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psyc. Review, 50, 370--396.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. McCalley, L. T., Midden, C. J. H. (2002). Energy conservation through product-integrated feedback: the roles of goal-setting and social orientation. J. Economic Psyc, 23, 589--603.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  37. McConnaughy, E.A., Prochaska, J.O., Velicer, W.F. (1983). Stages of change in psychotherapy: measurement and sample profiles. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 20.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Miller, W.R., Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change (2nd Ed). Guilford Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T., Strathman, A.J. (1994). To think or not to think: exploring two routes to persuasion. Persuasion: Psyc. Insights and Perspectives, T.C. Brock and M.C. Green (Eds), p.81--116, Sage Pub. Inc.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Pierce, J., Odom, W., Blevis, E. (2008). Energy aware dwelling: a critical survey of interaction design for eco-visualizations. Proc. Of OZCHI'08, 287, 1--8. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  41. Prochaska, J.O., Velicer, W.F. (1997). The Transtheoretical Model of health behavior change. Am. J. of Health Promotion.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Reeve, J. (1989). The interest-enjoyment distinction in intrinsic motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 13, 83--104.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  43. Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. Free Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Rotter, J.B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Pysc. Monograph: General and Applied, 80, 1--28.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Seligman, M. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development and death. W.H. Freeman.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Shipworth, M. (2002) Motivating Home Energy Action: A Handbook of What Works. Australian Greenhouse Office. http://www.environment.gov.au/settlements/local/publications/pubs/motivating.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Thibodeau, R., Aronson, E. (1992). Taking a closer look: reasserting the role of the self-concept in dissonance theory. Personality and Social Psyc. Bulletin, 18, 591--602.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  48. Woodruff, A., Hasbrouck, J., Augustin, S. (2008). A bright green perspective on sustainable choices. Proc. ACM CHI'08. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  49. Wright, P.M., Kacmar, K.M. (1994). Goal specificity as a determinant of goal commitment and goal change. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. Yates, S.M., Aronson, E. (1983). A social psychological perspective on energy conservation in residential buildings. APA.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. One size does not fit all: applying the transtheoretical model to energy feedback technology design

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2010
      2690 pages
      ISBN:9781605589299
      DOI:10.1145/1753326

      Copyright © 2010 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 April 2010

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '24
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      May 11 - 16, 2024
      Honolulu , HI , USA

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader