Michael Schmitz
ABSTRACT
As part of our work on anthropomorphic and zoomorphic interfaces for physical, interactive objects we have conducted an exhaustive literature review spanning the disciplines of anthropomorphism, affective computing, tangible interaction and industrial design, aggregating relevant research to inform our efforts. In this paper we summarise the results by deriving concepts and design guidelines for the realisation of life-like, tangible objects, with which we also aim at fostering discussions and a scientific exchange in this highly interdisciplinary field.
- E. André, M. Klesen, P. Gebhard, S. Allen, and T. Rist. Integrating models of personality and emotions into lifelike characters. Affective interactions: Towards a New Generation of Computer Interfaces, LNCS 1814:150--165, 2000. Google Scholar
Digital Library
- K. Anselmi and J. Zemanek. Relationship selling: how personal characteristics of salespeople affect buyer satisfaction. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 12:539--550, 1997.Google Scholar
- E. Berscheid and H. Reis. Attraction and close relationships. The handbook of social psychology, 2:193--281, 1998.Google Scholar
- T. W. Bickmore and R. W. Picard. Establishing and maintaining long-term human-computer relationships. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 12(2):293--327, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Breazeal, G. Hoffman, and A. Lockerd. Teaching and Working with Robots as a Collaboration. In Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS '04), pages 1030--1037. Los Alamitos, CA, USA: IEEE Computer Society Press, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Burneleit, F. Hemmert, and R. Wettach. Living interfaces: the impatient toaster. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction (TEI'09), pages 21--22. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- A. Butz, M. Schmitz, A. Krüger, and H. Hullmann. Tangible UIs for Media Control: Probes into the Design Space. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'05), pages 957--971. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Byrne and W. Griffitt. Similarity and awareness of similarity of personality characteristics determinants of attraction. Journal of Experimental Research in Personality, 3:179--186, 1969.Google Scholar
- W. Damon and E. Phelps. Peer relationships in child development, chapter Strategic uses of peer learning in children's education, pages 135--157. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley, 1989.Google Scholar
- B. Duggan and M. Deegan. Considerations in the usage of text to speech (tts) in the creation of natural sounding voice enabled web systems. In Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Information and communication technologies (ISICT '03), pages 433--438. Dublin, Ireland: Trinity College Dublin, 2003. Google ScholarDigital Library
- K. P. Fishkin. A taxonomy for and analysis of tangible interfaces. Personal Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5):347--358, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Fiske and S. Taylor. Social cognition. New York, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill, 1991.Google Scholar
- P. Gebhard. ALMA: A Layered Model of Affect. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pages 29--36. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2005. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Gebhard, M. Schröder, M. Charfuelan, C. Endres, M. Kipp, S. Pammi, M. Rumpler, and O. Türk. IDEAS4Games: building expressive virtual characters for computer games. In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (IVA 2008), pages 426--440. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- J. Gilbertson, K. Dindia, and M. Allen. Relational continuity constructional units and the maintenance of relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 15(6):774, 1998.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Göbel, O. Schneider, I. Iurgel, A. Feix, C. Knöpfle, and E. Rettig. Virtual Human: Storytelling and computer graphics for a virtual human platform. In Proceedings of Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment 2004, LNCS 3105, pages 79--88. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- F. Hemmert and G. Joost. Ambient life: Calm and excited permanent tactile life-like actuation as a status display in mobile phones. In Proceedings of the Conference on Design and Emotion, Hong Kong, October 2008.Google Scholar
- D. Hong, T. Höllerer, M. Haller, H. Takemura, A. D. Cheok, G. J. Kim, M. Billinghurst, W. Woo, E. Hornecker, R. J. K. Jacob, C. Hummels, B. Ullmer, A. Schmidt, E. van den Hoven, and A. Mazalek. Advances in tangible interaction and ubiquitous virtual reality. IEEE Pervasive Computing, 7(2):90--96, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- E. Hornecker and F. Bruns. Interaktion im Sensoric Garden. In Tagungsband der Mensch und Computer (MuC 2004), pages 65--74. Munich, Germany: Oldenbourg Verlag, 2004.Google ScholarCross Ref
- E. Horvitz, J. Breese, D. Heckerman, D. Hovel, and K. Rommelse. The Lumiere project: Bayesian user modeling for inferring the goals and needs of software users. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 256--265. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 1998. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Jakobson. Linguistics and poetics. Style in language, pages 350--377, 1960.Google Scholar
- J. Kestner, D. Leithinger, J. Jung, and M. Petersen. Proverbial wallet: tangible interface for financial awareness. In TEI '09: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Tangible and Embedded Interaction, pages 55--56. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2009. Google ScholarDigital Library
- D. Kiesler. The 1982 Interpersonal Circle: A taxonomy for complementarity in human transactions. Psychological Review, 90(3):185--214, 1983.Google Scholar
- J. Klein, Y. Moon, and R. Picard. This computer responds to user frustration: Theory, design, and results. Interacting with Computers, 14(2):119--140, 2002.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Levinson. Pragmatics (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
- R. McRae and O. John. An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60:175--215, 1992.Google ScholarCross Ref
- S. Mithen. The prehistory of the mind: a search for the origins of art, religion and science. London, UK: Thames and Hudson, 1996.Google Scholar
- Y. Moon. Intimate exchanges: Using computers to elicit self-disclosure from consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26(4):323--339, 2000.Google ScholarCross Ref
- J. Morkes, H. Kernal, and C. Nass. Effects of humor in task-oriented human-computer interaction and computer-mediated communication: A direct test of SRCT theory. Human-Computer Interaction, 14(4):395--435, 1999. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Nass, K. Isbister, and E.-J. Lee. Truth is beauty: researching embodied conversational agents. Embodied Conversational Agents, pages 374--402, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- C. Nass and K. Lee. Does computer-synthesized speech manifest personality? Experimental tests of recognition, similarity-attraction, and consistency-attraction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 7(3):171--181, 2001.Google ScholarCross Ref
- A. Nijholt, T. Rist, and K. Tuijnenbreijer. Lost in Ambient Intelligence? Panel Session. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'04), pages 1725--1726. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2004. Google ScholarDigital Library
- P. Persson, J. Laaksoiahti, and P. Lönnqvist. Anthropomorphism - a multi-layered phenomenon. In K. Dautenhahn, editor, Proceedings of AAAI Fall symposium, Socially Intelligent Agents: The Human in the Loop, pages 131--135. AAAI Press, 2000.Google Scholar
- P. Persson, J. Laaksolahti, and P. Löonnqvist. Socially Intelligent Agents, chapter Understanding Social Intelligence, pages 21--28. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2002.Google Scholar
- R. Petty and D. Wegener. Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. The Handbook of Social Psychology, 1:323--390, 1998.Google Scholar
- J. Piaget. A Handbook of Child Psychology, chapter Children's philosophies, pages 505--516. Worcester, MA, USA: Clark University Press, 2nd edition, 1933.Google Scholar
- B. Reeves and C. Nass. The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, 1996. Google ScholarDigital Library
- S. Ruzanka, B.C., and D. Strakovsky. (in)security camera, 2003.Google Scholar
- B. Scassellati. Discriminating Animate from Inanimate Visual Stimuli. In Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 1405--1410. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2000. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Schmitz, J. Baus, and R. Dörr. The Digital Sommelier: Interacting with Intelligent Products. In C. Floerkemeier, M. Langheinrich, E. Fleisch, F. Mattern, and S. E. Sarma, editors, Proceedings of the First International Conference on The Internet of Things (IOT 2008), LNCS 4952, pages 247--262. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2008. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Schmitz, A. Krüger, and S. Schmidt. Modelling Personality in Voices of Talking Products Through Prosodic Parameters. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI'07), pages 313--316. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- M. Schneider and A. Kröner. The Smart Pizza Packing: An Application of Object Memories. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligent Environments, pages 1--8. Stevenage, UK: IET, 2008.Google ScholarCross Ref
- M. Schröder. Emotional Speech Synthesis: A Review. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, pages 561--564. Grenoble, France: International Speech Communication Association, 2001.Google Scholar
- D. Stipek. Handbook of Educational Psychology, chapter Motivation and Instruction, pages 85--113. London, UK: Prentice Hall International, 1996.Google Scholar
- E. Tan and B. Fasting. Emotion and the structure of narrative film: Film as an emotion machine. Hillsdale, NJ, USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1996.Google Scholar
- K. Wada and T. Shibata. Living with seal robots - its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 23(5):972--980, 2007. Google ScholarDigital Library
- R. Wasinger and W. Wahlster. True Visions: Tales on the Realization of Ambient Intelligence, chapter The Anthropomorphized Product Shelf: Symmetric Multimodal Human-Environment Interaction, pages 291--306. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer, 2005.Google Scholar
- P. White. The understanding of causation and the production of action: From infancy to adulthood. London, UK: Psychology Press, 1995.Google Scholar
Index Terms
- Concepts for life-like interactive objects
Recommendations
Designing Lifelikeness in Interactive and Robotic Objects
HRI '17: Proceedings of the Companion of the 2017 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot InteractionAs technologies become more intelligent and interactive, studies have shown that people perceive and treat them as if they were human and alive. My PhD research seeks to understand designers' implementations and users' perceptions of embodied life-like ...
Multi-User Usability Guidelines for Interactive Wall Display Applications
PerDis '15: Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Pervasive DisplaysLarge interactive wall displays for multi-user interaction are readily available today. However, little is known about the specific aspects influencing usability for applications supporting several users interacting simultaneously and co-located with ...
Robots with projectors: an alternative to anthropomorphic HRI
HRI '09: Proceedings of the 4th ACM/IEEE international conference on Human robot interactionCurrent forms of Human Robot Interaction (HRI) pursue mostly anthropomorphism and direct interaction. That is, the interaction paradigm is based on imitating how "people" interact with one another (e.g. using spoken language, gestures, facial expression,...
Comments