skip to main content
10.1145/1959826.1959830acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesahConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Full body interaction for serious games in motor rehabilitation

Published:13 March 2011Publication History

ABSTRACT

Serious games and especially their use in healthcare applications are an active and rapidly growing area of research. A key aspect of games in rehabilitation is 3D input. In this paper we present our implementation of a full body motion capture (MoCap) system, which, together with a biosignal acquisition device, has been integrated in a game engine. Furthermore, a workflow has been established that enables the use of acquired skeletal data for serious games in a medical environment. Finally, a serious game has been implemented, targeting rehabilitation of patients with chronic pain of the lower back and neck, a group that has previously been neglected by serious games. The focus of this work is on the full body MoCap system and its integration with biosignal devices and the game engine. A short overview of the application and prelimiary results are provided.

References

  1. D. Arthur and S. Vassilvitskii. k-means++: the advantages of careful seeding. In SODA '07: Proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms, pages 1027--1035, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. A. L. Betker, A. Desai, C. Nett, N. Kapadia, and T. Szturm. Game-based exercises for dynamic short-sitting balance rehabilitation of people with chronic spinal cord and traumatic brain injuries. Physical Therapy, 87(10):1389, 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. J. W. Burke, M. D. J. McNeill, D. K. Charles, P. J. Morrow, J. H. Crosbie, and S. M. McDonough. Optimising engagement for stroke rehabilitation using serious games. The Visual Computer, 25(12):1085--1099, 2009. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. J. Cameron and J. Lasenby. A real-time sequential algorithm for human joint localization. In ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Posters, page 107, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. J. Decker, H. Li, D. Losowyj, and V. Prakash. Wiihabilitation: rehabilitation of wrist flexion and extension using a wiimote-based game system. Governor's School of Engineering and Technology Research Journal, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. M. Geroch. Motion capture for the rest of us. Journal of Comp. Sciences in Colleges, 19(3):157--164, 2004. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. g.tec. g.mobilab biosignal acquisition. http://www.gtec.at, last visited Dec. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. L. Herda, P. Fua, R. Plänkers, R. Boulic, and D. Thalmann. Skeleton-based motion capture for robust reconstruction of human motion. Computer Animation 2000 (CA'00), page 77, 2000. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. M. K. Holden. Virtual environments for motor rehabilitation: review. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 8(3):187--211, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. A. Hornung, S. Sar-Dessai, and L. Kobbelt. Self-calibrating optical motion tracking for articulated bodies. In Virtual Reality, 2005. Proceedings. VR 2005. IEEE, pages 75--82, 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. A. G. Kirk, J. F. O'Brien, and D. A. Forsyth. Skeletal parameter estimation from optical motion capture data. In IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2005 Volume 2. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2005. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. J. J. LaViola. Double exponential smoothing: an alternative to kalman filter-based predictive tracking. In EGVE '03: Proceedings of the workshop on Virtual environments 2003, pages 199--206, New York, USA. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. M. Ma and K. Bechkoum. Serious games for movement therapy after stroke. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 2008. SMC 2008. IEEE International Conference on, pages 1872--1877, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Microsoft. Kinect full body interaction. http://www.xbox.com/kinect, last visited Dec. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. J. F. O'Brien, R. E. Bodenheimer Jr, G. J. Brostow, and J. K. Hodgins. Automatic joint parameter estimation from magnetic motion capture data. In Proceedings of Graphics Interface, pages 53--60, 2000.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Ogre3d. Ogre3d game engine. http://www.ogre3d.org.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. T. Pintaric. iotracker optical tracking. www.iotracker.com, last visited Dec. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. T. Pintaric and H. Kaufmann. Affordable infrared-optical pose-tracking for virtual and augmented reality. In Proceedings of Trends and Issues in Tracking for Virtual Environments Workshop. IEEE VR 2007.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. P. Rego, P. M. Moreira, and L. P. Reis. Serious games for rehabilitation: A survey and a classification towards a taxonomy. In Information Systems and Technologies (CISTI), 2010 5th Iberian Conference on, pages 1--6, 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. RehaCom. Rehacom cognitive rehabilitation. http://www.rehacom.com, last visited Dec. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. G. Reitmayr and D. Schmalstieg. An open software architecture for virtual reality interaction. In Proceedings of the ACM symposium on Virtual reality software and technology, pages 47--54. ACM, 2001. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. M. Ringer and J. Lasenby. A procedure for automatically estimating model parameters in optical motion capture. Image and Vis. Comp., 22(10), 2002.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. R. Schmidt and T. Lee. Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics Publishers, 2005.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. E. Schuurink, J. Houtkamp, and A. Toet. Engagement and emg in serious gaming: Experimenting with sound and dynamics in the levee patroller training game. Fun and Games, pages 139--149, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. M.-C. Silaghi, R. Plänkers, R. Boulic, P. Fua, and D. Thalmann. Local and global skeleton fitting techniques for optical motion capture. IFIP CapTech 98, Geneva, 1537:26--40, 1998. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. E. Suma, D. Krum, B. Lange, S. Rizzo, and M. Bolas. Faast: The flexible action and articulated skeleton toolkit. In IEEE Virtual Reality, to appear, 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. TMSI. Mobi biosignal acquisition. http://www.tmsi.com/, last visited Dec. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Unity-Technologies. Unity3d game engine. http://unity3d.com/, last visited Dec. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. Vicon. Vicon motion capture system. http://www.vicon.com, last visited Dec. 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. G. Voerman, M. Vollenbroek-Hutten, L. Sandsjoä, R. Kadefors, and H. Hermens. Prognostic factors for the effects of two interventions for work-related neck-shoulder complaints: myofeedback training and ergonomic counselling. Applied Ergonomics, 39(6):743--753, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref

Index Terms

  1. Full body interaction for serious games in motor rehabilitation

              Recommendations

              Comments

              Login options

              Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

              Sign in
              • Published in

                cover image ACM Other conferences
                AH '11: Proceedings of the 2nd Augmented Human International Conference
                March 2011
                169 pages
                ISBN:9781450304269
                DOI:10.1145/1959826

                Copyright © 2011 ACM

                Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

                Publisher

                Association for Computing Machinery

                New York, NY, United States

                Publication History

                • Published: 13 March 2011

                Permissions

                Request permissions about this article.

                Request Permissions

                Check for updates

                Qualifiers

                • research-article

                Acceptance Rates

                Overall Acceptance Rate121of306submissions,40%

              PDF Format

              View or Download as a PDF file.

              PDF

              eReader

              View online with eReader.

              eReader