skip to main content
article
Free Access

Computing and organizations: what we know and what we don't know

Published:01 December 1984Publication History
First page image

References

  1. 1 American Assembly, Automation and Technological Change, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ., 1962.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. 2 ANZAAS (Australian and New Zealand Association for the Advancement of Science). AuWmation and Unemployment. The Law Book Company, Sydney, Australia, 1070.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. 3 Argyris, C Management information systems: The challenge to rationality and emotioaality. Manage, SoL 17, 6 (Feb. 1971), 275-292.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. 4 Attewell, P. The de-skilling controversy, Mimeo manuscr., Dept. of Sociology, State Univ. of New York, Stony Brook, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. 5 Attewell, P. Microelectronics and employment. Paper presented at the Conference on Microelectronics in Transition, Univ. of California, Santa Cruz, 1983.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. 6 Austrian Academy of Sciences. Mikroeleetronick: Anwendungen, Verbreitung and Auswirkungem Am Beispicl Osterreichisches. Springer- Verlag, Berlin. West Germany, 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. 7 Barker. I, end Downing, H, Word processing and the transformation of the patriarchial relations of control in the office. Cap. CI. 3 (19781, 64-99.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. 8 Bell. D The Coming af PosNIndustriM Society. Basic Books. New York, 1993.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. 9 Bjorn.Anderson, N, and Pederson. P. Computer facilitated changes in management power struclures, Account. Organ. Sac. 5, 2 (1977). 203-2A 6.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. 10 Blau, P.M., McHugh Falbe, C., McKinley, W., and Tracy, P. Technology and organization in manufacturing. Adm. Sci, Q, 21, 1 (Mar. 1976), 20-40.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. 11 Rlau, P.M, and Sehoenherr, R. The Structure of Organizations. Basic Books, New York, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. 12 Bralove, M, Direct data: Some chief executives bypass and irk staffs in getting information, Wall SL 1, (fan, 12.1993}, 1.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. 13 Braverman, H. Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. Monthly Review, New York, 1974,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. 14 Cain, P., and Treiman, D, The D.O.T, as a source of occupational data. Am. Social, Rev. 46, 3 (1981), 235-278.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  15. 15 Central Policy Review Staff. Social and Employment Implications of Microelectronics. H.M. Government. London, 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. 16 Chern, A.B, Speculations on the social affects of new microelecironies technology, int. Labor Rev. 119.6 (Nov.-Dec. 1980). 705-721.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. 17 Cooper. C.M., and Clarke, J.A. Employment, Economics and Technology: The Impact of Technological Change in the Labour Market. St, Martin's Press. New York, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. 18 Craig, H. Administering a Cortversion to Electronie Aeceuntieg. Division of Research, Graduate School of Business Administration, Harvard Univ,. Boston, Mass,. 1955.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. 19 Crozier, M. The Bureaucratic Phenomenon. Univ. of Chicago Press. Chicago. III., 1964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. 20 DeKadt, M. Insurance: A clerical work factory. In Case Studies in the LaborProcess, A. Zimbalist, Ed, Monthly Review, New York, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. 21 Delebonty, G. Office automation and occupation structure: A case study of five insurance companies, lad, Manage. Rev. 7 (Spring, 1966), 99-108.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. 22 Deutsch, K. The Nerves of Government. The Free Press, New York, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  23. 23 Downs, A. A realistic look at the final payoffs from urban data systems, PublicAdm. Rev. 27, 3 (Sept. 1967), 204-209.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. 24 Driscoll, J. How to humanize office automation, Off. Technol. People 1, 2-3 (Sept. 1982), 167-176.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. 25 Driscoll. J, Office automation: The dynamics of a technological boondoggle, In Emerging Office Systems, R.M, Landau and J.H. Blair, Eds. Norwood, N.J., 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  26. 26 Duhnoff, S. Inter-occupational shifts and changes in the quality of work in the American economy. 1900--1970. Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Society for the Study of Social Problems, San Francisco, Calif., 1978Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. 27 Dutton, W,, and Kraemer, K. Determinants of support for computerized information systems: The attitudes of local government chief executives. Midwest Roy, Public Adm. 12, 1(Mar, 1978), 19-40,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. 28 Ellul. J. The Technological SocielsI. Knopf, New York, 1964,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  29. 29 Equal Opportunities Commission. New Technology and Women's Employment: Case Studies from West Yorkshire. Equal Opportunities Conamission. Manchester, England. 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. 30 Ernst, M. The mechanization of commerce, Scientific American 247, 3 (Sept, 1982), 132-147.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. 31 ETUI (European Trade Union Institute). The Impact of Microelectronics on Employment in Western Europe in the 1980s. European Trade Union Institute, Brussels, Belgium, 1979,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  32. 32 Faunce, W,A, Automation and the division of labor. Soc. Problems 13 (Fall 1965), 149-160.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. 33 Freeman. C., Clark, J., and Seato, L, Unemployment and Technical Innovation: A Study ol Long Waves and Economic Development, Francis Pinter, London, 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. 34 Gershuny, J.I, After Industrial Society? Humanities Press, Atlantic Highiands, N.J., 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. 35 Giuliano. V. The mechanization of office work, Scientific American 247, 3 (Sept. 1982), 148-165.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. 36 Glenn, E., and Feldberg, R. Degraded and deskilled: The proletarianization of clerical work. See. ProbL 25, 1 (Oct, 1977), 52-64.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. 37 Glenn, E., and Feldberg, R. Proletarianization of clerical work: Technology and organizational control in the office, In Case Studies on the Labor Process, A. Zimhalist, Ed. Monthly Review, New York, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. 38 Glenn. E., aud Feldberg, R. Technology and work degradation: Reexamining the impacts of office automation. Mimeo manuser., Dept, of Sociology, Boston Univ., Boston, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. 39 Cranovetter, M Small is bountiful: Labor markets and establishment size. Am. Social, Roe. To be published.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. 40 Greenbaum, J. In the Name of Efficiency: A Study of Change in Data Processing Work. Temple Univ. Press, Philadelphia, Pa., 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. 41 Gregory, J., and Nussbaum, K. Race agaiust time: Automaliou in the office. Off, Technot. People 1.2-3 (1982), 197-236.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. 42 Haber, W., a Farman, L,, and Hudson, I. The Impact of Technological Change: The American Experience. W,E, Upjohn lustitute for Employment Research, Kalamazoo, Mich., 1963.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. 43 Helfgott, R.B. EDP and the office workforce. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 19 (July 1966), 503-517.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. 44 Hiltz, S.R., and Turoff, M. The Network Nation. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  45. 45 Hines, C., and Scoria, G. Automatic Unemployment. Earth Resources Research, London, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. 46 Hoes, I. Automation in the Office. Public Affairs Press, Washington, D.C., 1960.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. 47 Horrowitz, M, and Herrenstadt, L. Changes in skill requirements of occupations in selected industries. In The Employment Impact of Technological Change, vol. 2. National Commission on Technology. Automation, and Economic Progress, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C,, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. 48 Howe, L. Pink Collar Workers, G.P. Putnam, New York, 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. 49 Huse, E. The impact of computers on mauagers and organizations: A case study in an integrated manufacturing company, In The Impact of Computers on Management, C.A.s Myers, Ed. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  50. 50 International Conference on Automation, Full Employment, and a Balanced Economy. In Proceedings. Americau Foundation on Automotion and Employment, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. 51 Jaffa, A.J., and Froomkm, J, Technology and Jobs Automation in Perspective. Praeger, New York, 1960,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  52. 52 Jenkins, C., and Sherman, B. The Collapse of Work. Eyre Methuen, London, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  53. 53 JIPDEC (Japan Information Processing Development Center). The impact of microelectrooics on employment, JIPDEC Rap. (Spring, 1980). 1-19.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  54. 54 JIPDEC (Japan Information Processing Development Center). The office of today and tomorrow. JIPDEC Rep. 47 (1981).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  55. 55 JIPDEC (Japan Information Processing Development Center). The robots are coming, JIPDEC Rap. 50 (1982).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. 56 Kahn, H. The future of the corporation. In The Future of the Corporation, H. Kahn, Ed. Mason and Lipscomb, New York, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  57. 57 King, I.L., and Kraemer, K. Cost as a social impact of telecommunications and other information technologies. Public Policy Research Organization, Irvine, Calif., 1990.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  58. 58 Klatzky, S.R. Automation, size, and locus of decision-making, J. Bus. 43, 2 {Apr. 1970}, 141-151.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. 59 Kling, R. The impacts of computing on the work of managers, data analysts and clerks. Mimeo maunscr., Dept. of Information and Computing Science, Univ. of California. Irvine, Calif., 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. 60 Kling, R. Social analyses of computing: Theoretical perspectives in recent empirical research. ACM Comput, Surv. 12. 1 (Mar. 1900), 61-110 Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  61. 61 Kling, R., and Scacchi. W, The web of computing: Computer technology as social organizalion. Adv. Comput. 21 (1982), 1-90.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. 62 Kraemer, K., and Danziger, J. Computers and control in the work environment. Mimeo manuscr,. Public Policy Research Organizetion, Irvina, Calif., 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  63. 63 Kraft, P. Programmers and Managers: The Routinization of Computer Programming in the United States. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1977. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  64. 64 Keeps, J.M. Automation and Employment, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York. 1964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  65. 65 Lane, R. The decline of politics and ideology in a knowledgeable society, Am. Social Rev, 32.5 (Oct. 1966), 649-662.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  66. 66 Laudon, K. Computers and Bureaucratic Reform, Wiley. New York, 1964.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  67. 67 Leavitt, H., and Whisler, T. Management in the 1968s. Harvard Bus. Roy. 36, 6 (Now-Dec. 1058), 41-48.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  68. 68 Leduc, N. Communicating through computers. Telecommun. Policy (Sept. 1979). 235-244.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  69. 69 Lee, H.C. Electronic data processing and skill requirements. Pets. Adm. 29 (May-June 1966), 50-53.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  70. 70 Leoutief, W. The distribution of work and income. Scientific American 247, 3 (1982), 188-204.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  71. 71 Lippitt, M., Miller, J.P., and Lalamsj, J. Patterns of use and correlates of adoption of an electronic mail system. Proceedings of the American Institute of Decision Sciences, Las Vegas, May., 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  72. 72 Lowi, T. The information revolution, polilics, and the prospects for an open society. In Government Secrecy in Democracies. I. Galnoor, Ed, Harper and Row, New York. 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  73. 73 Mann. F., and Williams, L, Organizational impact of white collar automation. In Annual Proceedings. Industrial Relations Research Association, Madison, Wis,. 1958, pp. 59-69.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  74. 74 Mann. F., and William, L. Some effects of the changing work environment in the office, J. Soc. Issues 18 (1962), 90-101.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  75. 75 Morkus, M.L. Systems in Organizations. Pitman Publishing, Marshfield, Mass., 1084.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  76. 76 Mechanic, D. Sources of power and lower participants in complex organizations. Adm. Sci. Q. 7 (1962), 349-364.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  77. 77 Menzies, H. Women and the Chip: Case Studies of the Effects of Informatics on Employment in Canada, Institute for Public Policy. Montreal, Canada. 1081.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  78. 78 Mowshowitz, A. The Conquest of Will: Information Processing in Human Affairs. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1976.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  79. 79 Moynihan, D.P. The professionalization of reform, Public Interest 1, 1 (Fall 1965), 6-16.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  80. 80 Mueller, E. Technological Advance in an Expanding Economy: Its Impact on a Cross-Section of the Labor Force. Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  81. 81 Mumford, E., and Banks, O. The Computer and the Clerk. Routlodge, Kegan Paul, London, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  82. 82 Myers, C. The Impact of Computers on Management. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  83. 83 National Commission on Technology, Automation and Economic Progress, Technology and the American Economy, vol. 1. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C,. 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  84. 84 National Commission on Technology, Autemalion and Economic Progress. The employment impact of technologlcal change. In Technology and the American Economy, vol. 2. U.S Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C,, 1966.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  85. 85 Netherlands Government, The Impact of Chip Technology on Employment and the Labour Market. Ministerie Van Sociala Zaken, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  86. 86 Netherlands Government, The Social Impact of Micro-Electronics. Netherlands Government Publishing Office, The Hague, The Netherlands, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  87. 87 Nora, S., and Minc, A. The Computerization of Society: A Report to the President of France. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1980. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  88. 88 Olson, M.H. New informolion technology and organizational culture, Manage, Int. Syst. Q. (1982).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  89. 89 Olson, M.H. and Lucas, H.C, The impact of office automation on the organization: Some implications for research and practice. Commun. ACM 25, 11 (Nov. 1982), 838-847. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  90. 90 Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, The Requirements of Automated Jobs. OECD, Paris, France, 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  91. 91 Proffer, J. Organizational Design. AHM Publishing, Arlinglon Heights, Ill., 1978.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  92. 92 Proffer, J. Power in Organizations. Pitman Publishing, Marshfield, Mass., 1981.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  93. 93 Processed World 1, 1 {Spring 1981}.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  94. 94 Response Analysis Corporation. Office Automation and the Workplace. Honeywell, Minneapolis, Minn., 1983,Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  95. 95 Rico, L. The staffing process and the computer. Manage. Pers, Q. I, 4 (Autumn-Winter 1992), 32-38.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  96. 96 Robey. D. Computers and management structure: Some empirical findings re-examined. Hum. Relat. 30, 11 (1077), 963-976.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  97. 97 Robey, D. Computer information systems and organizational structure. Commun. ACM 24. 10 (Oct. 1981), 679-687. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  98. 98 Rothwell, R., and Zegveld, W. Technical Change and Employment. Frances Pinter, London, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  99. 99 Rule, J. Private Lives and Public Surveillance. Schocken, New York, 1974.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  100. 100 Rule, J., McAdam, D., Stearns, L, and Uglow, D. The Politics of Privacy. Elsevier, New York, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  101. 101 Rule, J., McAdam, D., Stearns, L., and Uglow, D. Documentary identity and bureaucratic surveillance in America. Sac. Probl. To be published.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  102. 102 Rumberger, R. The changing skill requirements of jobs in the U.S. economy. Ind. Labor Relat. Ray. 34 (1981), 578-590.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  103. 103 Shepard, I. Automation and Alienation: A Study of Office and Factory Workers. MIT Press. Cambridge, Mass, 1971.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  104. 104 Shils, E. Center and Periphery: Essays in Macrosociology. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago. Ill., 1975.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  105. 105 Sleigh, J., Boatwright, B. Irwin, P., and Stanyan, R. The Manpower Implications of Micro-Electronic Technology. H.M. Stationary Office, London, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  106. 106 Smith, A. The Geopolitics of Information. Oxford Univ, Now York. 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  107. 107 Smith. A, Goodbye Gutenberg. Oxford Univ., New York, 1980.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  108. 108 Spenner, K. Temporal changes in work content. Am. Social. Rev. 44, (1979), 965-975.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  109. 109 Stinchcombe, A. Institutions of privacy in the determination of police administrative proctice. Am, J. Social 69, 2 (Sept, 1963), 1-10.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  110. 110 Terborgh, G. The Aotomation Hysteria. W.W. Norton, New York. 1965.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  111. 111 Turkle, S. Study of human interactions with computers. The Second Self Simon and Schuster. New York, 1984.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  112. 112 United Kingdom Government. Technological Change: Threats and Opportunities for the United Kingdom, H.M. Stationery Office, London. 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  113. 113 U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. The introduction of an electronic computer in a large insurauce company, In Studies on Automation Technology 2, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington. D.C. 1955.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  114. 114 U.S. Dept. of Health, Education and Welfare Work in America. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1973.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  115. 115 Verbatim Corporation. The Verbatim Survey: Office Worker Views and Perceptions of New Technology in the Workplace. The Verbatim Corporation, Sunnyvale, Calif., 1982.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  116. 116 Wallace, M, and Kalleberg, A, Industrial transformation and Ihe decline of craft: The decomposition of skill in the printing industry, 1931-1978, Am. Social Rev. 47, 3 (1982), 307-324.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  117. 117 Weber, C,E, Impact of electronic data processing on clerical skills, Pars. Adm, 22-33, 1 (Jan.-Feb. 1959), 20-28Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  118. 118 Waizenbaum, J. Computer Power and Human Reason. W.H. Freeman, San Francisco, calif., 1976. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  119. 119 Weslin, A., and Baker, M. Databanks in a Free Society. Quadrangle Times Books, New York, 1972.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  120. 120 Whisler, T. The impact of Computers on Organizations. Praeger, New York, 1970.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  121. 121 Whisler, T., and Meyer, H. The impact of EDP on life company organization. Pars. Adm. Rap, 34, Life Office Management Association, 1967.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  122. 122 Winner, L. Autonomous Technology. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1977.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  123. 123 Withington, F. The Real Computer Its Influences, Uses end Effects. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1969.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  124. 124 Zimbalist. A., Ed. Case Studies on the Labor Process. Monthly Review. New York, 1979.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  125. 125 Zuboff, S, New worlds of compuler-mediated work. Harvard Bus. Roy. (Sept.-Oct. 1982), 142-152.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Computing and organizations: what we know and what we don't know

        Recommendations

        Reviews

        William Edward Mihalo

        What effect do computers have upon quality of work, unemployment, organizational management, interaction with the public, and innovation within organizations__?__ These are questions that are examined and discussed in this interesting article. Attewell and Rule give a comprehensive survey of the research that has attempted to investigate these questions over the years. They find conflicting results in many of the studies and note that a thorough investigation of these topics has not occurred. The authors conclude that two problems are associated with research in this area. The first of these problems is to “determine, as far as possible, what particular cause-effect relations prevail in specific contexts.” The second problem is to “locate such cases as closely as possible within larger ranges of cases in which similar cause-effect relations can be expected to prevail.” Attewell and Rule say that in remedying this second problem a partial solution will be to use large samples. Extensive replication of research will be needed to characterize the effects of computing upon organizational life. This particular article should be of interest to computer professionals and scholars who are investigating this area.

        Access critical reviews of Computing literature here

        Become a reviewer for Computing Reviews.

        Comments

        Login options

        Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

        Sign in

        Full Access

        • Published in

          cover image Communications of the ACM
          Communications of the ACM  Volume 27, Issue 12
          Special section on management of information systems
          Dec. 1984
          71 pages
          ISSN:0001-0782
          EISSN:1557-7317
          DOI:10.1145/2135
          Issue’s Table of Contents

          Copyright © 1984 ACM

          Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          • Published: 1 December 1984

          Permissions

          Request permissions about this article.

          Request Permissions

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          Qualifiers

          • article

        PDF Format

        View or Download as a PDF file.

        PDF

        eReader

        View online with eReader.

        eReader