skip to main content
10.1145/2232817.2232819acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesjcdlConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

On the institutional archiving of social media

Published:10 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

Social media records the thoughts and activities of countless cultures and subcultures around the globe. Yet institutional efforts to archive social media content remain controversial. We report on 988 responses across six surveys of social media users that included questions to explore this controversy. The quantitative and qualitative results show that the way people think about the issue depends on how personal and ephemeral they view the content to be. They use concepts such as creator privacy, content characteristics, technological capabilities, perceived legal rights, and intrinsic social good to reason about the boundaries of institutional social media archiving efforts.

References

  1. Acquisti, A. and Grossklags, J. Privacy Attitudes and Privacy Behavior, in J. Camp and S. Lewis (Eds.) The Economics of Information Security, Kluwer, Boston, pp. 165--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. Boyle, J. The Public Domain: Enclosing the Commons of the Mind, Yale University Press, New Haven & London, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Connelly K, Khalil A, Liu Y. "Do I Do What I Say?: Observed Versus Stated Privacy Preferences," Proc. INTERACT 2007. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  4. Downs, J., Holbrook, M., Sheng, S., and Cranor, L. Are your participants gaming the system?: Screening Mechanical Turk workers. Proc. of CHI'10. ACM, 2399--2402. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Faridani, S., Bitton, E., Ryokai, K., and Goldberg, K. 2010. Opinion space: a scalable tool for browsing online comments. Proc. of CHI '10. ACM, 1175--1184. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Gilbert, E. and Karahalios, K. Understanding Deja Reviewers. Proc. of CSCW '10, 225--228. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Hill, B., Monroy-Hernandez, A., and Olson, K. Responses to Remixing on a Social Media Website. Proc. AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. 2010. 74--81.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Ipeirotis, P. Analyzing the Amazon Mechanical Turk Marketplace. ACM XRDS 17, 2, Winter 2010. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Jakobsson, M. (2009) Experimenting on Mechanical Turk: How Tos. ITWorld, September 3, 2009.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Java, A., Song, X., Finin, T. and Tseng, B. Why We Twitter: Understanding Microblogging Usage and Communities, Proc. KDD'07, ACM, 56--65. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. John, J.L., Rowlands, I., Williams, P., Dean, K. Digital Lives >> An Initial Synthesis version 0.2. Digital Lives Research Paper Series, British Library, 3 March 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Kittur, A., Chi, E., and Suh, B. Crowdsourcing User Studies with Mechanical Turk. Proc. of CHI'08. ACM, 453--456. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Lessig, L. Remix: Making Art and Commerce Thrive in the Hybrid Economy, Penguin, New York, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Levy, D. "Fixed or Fluid: Document Stability and New Media." Proc. ECHT'94, 1994, 24--31. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Library of Congress: Digital Preservation Video Series. 2010. Digital Natives Explore Digital Preservation.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Marshall, C.C., and Shipman, F.M. 2011. Social media ownership: using Twitter as a window onto current attitudes and beliefs. Proc. of CHI'11. ACM, 1081--1090. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Marshall, C.C., and Shipman, F.M. 2011. The ownership and reuse of visual media. Proc. of JCDL'11. ACM, 157--166. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Marshall, C.C., and Shipman, F.M. 2011. Attitudes about Institutional Archiving of Social Media. Proc Archiving'11.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. McDonough, J., Olendorf, R., Kirschenbaum, M., Kraus, K., Reside, D., Donahue, R., Phelps, A., Egert, C., Lowood, H., Rojo, S. Preserving Virtual Worlds Final Report. 8/ 31/2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Munson, S., Avrahami, D., Consolvo, S., Fogarty, J., Friedman, B., Smith, I. Attitudes toward online availability of US public records. dg.o '11, ACM Press, 2--9. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Odom, W., Sellen, A., Harper, R., Thereska, E. Lost in Translation: Understanding the Possession of Digital Things in the Cloud. to appear in Proc CHI 2012. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Owens, T. Tripadvisor rates Einstein: using the social web to unpack the public meanings of a cultural heritage site. IJWC 8, 1, 40 -- 56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Shinen, B. Twitterlogical: The Misunderstandings of Ownership. http://www.canyoucopyrightatweet.com/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. Basics of Qualitative Research, Sage Publications, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Stutzman, F. Twitter and the Library of Congress. http://fstutzman.com/2010/04/14/twitter-and-the-library-of-congress/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. On the institutional archiving of social media

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in
    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      JCDL '12: Proceedings of the 12th ACM/IEEE-CS joint conference on Digital Libraries
      June 2012
      458 pages
      ISBN:9781450311540
      DOI:10.1145/2232817

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 10 June 2012

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      Overall Acceptance Rate415of1,482submissions,28%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader