skip to main content
research-article

A-MAC: A versatile and efficient receiver-initiated link layer for low-power wireless

Published:25 September 2012Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

We present A-MAC, a receiver-initiated link layer for low-power wireless networks that supports several services under a unified architecture, and does so more efficiently and scalably than prior approaches. A-MAC's versatility stems from layering unicast, broadcast, wakeup, pollcast, and discovery above a single, flexible synchronization primitive. A-MAC's efficiency stems from optimizing this primitive and with it the most consequential decision that a low-power link makes: whether to stay awake or go to sleep after probing the channel. Today's receiver-initiated protocols require more time and energy to make this decision, and they exhibit worse judgment as well, leading to many false positives and negatives, and lower packet delivery ratios. A-MAC begins to make this decision quickly, and decides more conclusively and correctly in both the negative and affirmative. A-MAC's scalability comes from reserving one channel for the initial handshake and different channels for data transfer. Our results show that: (i) a unified implementation is possible; (ii) A-MAC's idle listening power increases by just 1.12× under interference, compared to 17.3× for LPL and 54.7× for RI-MAC; (iii) A-MAC offers high single-hop delivery ratios; (iv) network wakeup is faster and more channel efficient than LPL; and (v) collection routing performance exceeds the state-of-the-art.

References

  1. Arnbak, J. and van Blitterswijk, W. 1987. Capacity of slotted ALOHA in rayleigh-fading channels. IEEE J. Select. Areas Comm. 5, 2, 261--269. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  2. Association of Radio Industries and Businesses (ARIB). 2005. ARIB STD-T67: Telemeter, telecontrol, and data transmission radio equipment for specified low-power radio station, version 1.1. ARIB STD-T67.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Atmel. AT86RF230. http://www.atmel.com/dyn/products/product_card.asp?part_id=3941.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Boano, C. A., Voigt, T., Tsiftes, N., Mottola, L., Roemer, K., and Zuniga, M. A. 2010. Making sensornet MAC protocols robust against interference. In Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Wireless Sensor Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  5. Buettner, M., Yee, G., Anderson, E., and Han, R. 2006. X-MAC: A short preamble MAC protocol for duty-cycled wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Connors, D. P. and Pottie, G. J. 2000. Response initiated multiple access (RIMA), a medium access control protocol for satellite channels. In Proceedings of the IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Crossbow. Wireless module - IRIS 2.4GHz. http://www.xbow.com/Products/productdetails.aspx?sid=264.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Degesys, J., Rose, I., Patel, A., and Nagpal, R. 2007. DESYNC: Self-Organizing desynchronization and tdma on wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. 11--20. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Demirbas, M., Soysal, O., and Hussain, M. 2008. A singlehop collaborative feedback primitive for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 27th Conference on Computer Communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dutta, A., Saha, D., Grunwald, D., and Sicker, D. 2009. SMACK: A SMart ACKnowledgment scheme for broadcast messages in wireless networks. In Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Data Communication. 15--26. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Dutta, P. and Culler, D. 2008. Practical asynchronous neighbor discovery and rendezvous for mobile sensing applications. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 71--84. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dutta, P., Culler, D., and Shenker, S. 2007. Procrastination might lead to a longer and more useful life. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutta, P., Musăloiu-E., R., Stoica, I., and Terzis, A. 2008a. Wireless ACK collisions not considered harmful. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Hot Topics in Networks.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dutta, P., Taneja, J., Jeong, J., Jiang, X., and Culler, D. E. 2008b. A building block approach to sensornet systems. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 267--280. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. El-Hoiydi, A. and Decotignie, J.-D. 2005. Low power downlink MAC protocols for infrastructure wireless sensor networks. Mobile Netw. Appl. 10, 5, 675--690. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fonseca, R., Dutta, P., Levis, P., and Stoica, I. 2008. Quanto: Tracking energy in networked embedded systems. In Proceedings of the 8th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 323--338. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Garcia-Luna-Aceves, J. J. and Tzamaloukas, A. 1999. Reversing the collision-avoidance handshake in wireless networks. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking. 120--131. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Gnawali, O., Fonseca, R., Jamieson, K., Moss, D., and Levis, P. 2009. Collection tree protocol. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  19. Gronomeyer, S. A. and McBride, A. L. 1976. MSK and offset QPSK modulation. IEEE Trans. Comm. 24, 8.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Hill, J. and Culler, D. 2002. Mica: A wireless platform for deeply embedded networks. IEEE Micro 22, 6, 12--24. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Hill, J., Szewczyk, R., Woo, A., Hollar, S., Culler, D., and Pister, K. 2000. System architecture directions for network sensors. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Hui, J. W. and Culler, D. E. 2008. IP is dead, long live IP for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 15--28. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. IEEE Std 802.15.4-2003. 2003. IEEE standard for information technology -- Telecommunications and information exchange between systems -- Local and metropolitan area networks. Specific requirements -- Part 15.4: Wireless medium access control (MAC) and physical layer (PHY) specifications for low-rate wireless personal area networks (LR-WPANs). ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/most Recent Issue.jsp?pnumber6012485.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Jennic. 2007. Wireless microcontrollers: JN5121 and JN513x. http://www.jennic.com/products/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  25. Liang, C.-J. M., Musaloiu-E, R., and Terzis, A. 2008. Typhoon: A reliable data dissemination protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proccedings of the 5th European Conference on Sensor Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Lu, J. and Whitehouse, K. 2009. Flash flooding: Exploiting the capture effect for rapid flooding in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Computer Communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  27. Moss, D. 2010. Personal communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Musăloiu-E., R., Liang, C.-J., and Terzis, A. 2008. Koala: Ultra-Low power data retrieval in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Pasupathy, S. 1979. Minimum shift keying: A spectrally efficient modulation. IEEE Comm. Mag. 17, 4, 14--22. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Polastre, J., Hill, J., and Culler, D. 2004. Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  31. Polastre, J., Szewczyk, R., and Culler, D. 2005. Telos: Enabling ultra-low power wireless research. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Sun, Y., Gurewitz, O., Du, S., Tang, L., and Johnson, D. B. 2009. ADB: An efficient multihop broadcast protocol based on asynchronous duty-cycling in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 43--56. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  33. Sun, Y., Gurewitz, O., and Johnson, D. B. 2008. RI-MAC: A receiver-initiated asynchronous duty cycle MAC protocol for dynamic traffic loads in wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 6thth International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 1--14. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  34. Texas Instruments. 2006. CC2420: 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee-ready RF transceiver. http://www.chipcon. com/files/CC2420_Data_Sheet_1_3.pdf.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  35. Texas Instruments. 2007a. CC2430: System-on-Chip solution for 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4/ZigBee. http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/cc2430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Texas Instruments. 2007b. CC2520: Second generation 2.4 GHz IEEE 802.15.4 /ZigBee-ready RF transceiver. http://www.ti.com/lit/gpn/cc2520.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. van Dam, T. and Langendoen, K. 2003. An adaptive energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 171--180. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Ye, W., Heidemann, J., and Estrin, D. 2002. An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In Proceedings of the 21st Conference on Computer Communications.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Ye, W., Silva, F., and Heidemann, J. 2006. Ultra-Low duty cycle MAC with scheduled channel polling. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems. 321--334. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. A-MAC: A versatile and efficient receiver-initiated link layer for low-power wireless

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks
      ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks  Volume 8, Issue 4
      September 2012
      292 pages
      ISSN:1550-4859
      EISSN:1550-4867
      DOI:10.1145/2240116
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2012 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 25 September 2012
      • Revised: 1 May 2011
      • Accepted: 1 May 2011
      • Received: 1 January 2011
      Published in tosn Volume 8, Issue 4

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article
      • Research
      • Refereed

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader