skip to main content
10.1145/2317956.2318012acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesdisConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Co-creating games through intergenerational design workshops

Authors Info & Claims
Published:11 June 2012Publication History

ABSTRACT

In this paper, we present a co-design study into the development of intergenerational games. Three separate design workshops were conducted with 50 participants aged between 15-21 and 55-74 years old, representing younger and older cohorts respectively. A range of design activities were used to elicit ideas and allow participants of different ages to self-reflect, negotiate and collectively create games that they desired to play. The analysis reports on the game concepts envisaged from early brainstorming, group sketching and more refined storyboards. A number of genres and game-types are illustrated, as we compare the different game features designed. These ideas reflect a combination of interests from mixed-age groups. The paper concludes by discussing recommendations to developing intergenerational games.

References

  1. Antonucci, T. C., Jackson, J. S., and Biggs, S. Intergenerational relations: Theory, research, and policy. Journal of Social Issues, 63, 4 (2007), 679--693.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Campbell, E. Design and rehabilitation. A three-day workshop in design for people with spinal cord injuries. RSA, London (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Chiong, C. Can video games promote intergenerational play and literacy learning? The Joan Ganz Cooney Center at Sesame Workshop (2009).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Docampo Rama D, M. Technology generations handling complex user interfaces. Ph.D. thesis, Eindhoven University of Technology, 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Druin, A. The role of children in the design of new technology. Behav. Inform. Tech. 21, 1 (2002), 1--25.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  6. Entertainment Software Association. Sales, demographics and usage data. www.theesa.com/facts/pdfs/ESA_EF_2008.pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Ezer, N. Is a robot an appliance, teammate, or friend? Age-related differences in expectations of and attitudes towards personal home-based robots. Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, 2008. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  8. Giles, H., and Gasiorek J. Intergenerational communication practices. Handbook of the psychology of ageing. Academic Press (2011) 233--247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  9. Kern, D., Stringer, M., Fitzpatrick, and G., Schmidt, A. Curball - A prototype tangible game for inter-generational play. In Proc. of WETICE '06. (2006) 412--418. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  10. Khoo, E., Merritt, T., and Cheok, A. Designing physical and social intergenerational family entertainment. Inter. with computers, 21 (2009), 76--87. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  11. Knudtzon, K., Druin, A., Kaplan, N., Summers, K., Chisik, Y., Kulkarni, R., Mouthrop, S., Weeks, H., and Bederson, B. Starting an intergenerational technology design team: a case study. In Proc. of IDC (2003), 51--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Lloyd, J. The state of intergenerational relations today. ILC-UK, 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Mahmud A. A., Mubin, O., Shahid D., and Martens J. B. Designing social games for children and older adults: Two related case studies. Entertain. Computing (2010), 233--247.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. McCann R. M, Cargile A. C, Giles H, and Bui C. T. Communication ambivalence toward elders: data from North Vietnam, South Vietnam, and the U. S. A. Cross Cult Gerontol. 19, 4 (2004), 275--97.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Owen, A. M., Hampshire, A., Grahn, J. A., Stenton, R., Dajani, S. Burns, A. S., Howard, R. J., and Ballard, C. G. Putting brain training to the test, Nature 465, 7299 (2010) 775--778.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Rice, M., and Carmichael, A. Factors facilitating or impeding older adults' creative contributions in the collaborative design of a novel DTV-based application. Univ. Access. Info. Society (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Rosenberg, D., Depp, C. A., Vahia, I. V., Reichstadt, J., Palmer, B. W., Kerr, J., Norman, G., Jeste, D. V. and Dilip, V. Exergames for subsyndromal depression in older adults: A pilot study of a novel intervention. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18, 3, (2010) 221--226.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. Basics of qualitative research. Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage Publications, 1998.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Tam, T., Hewstone, M., Harwood, J., Voci, A., and Kenworthy, J. B. Intergroup contact and grandparent-grandchild communication: The effects of self-disclosure on implicit and explicit biases against older people. GPIR (2006), 413--430.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Vanden Abeele, V., De Schutter. B. Designing intergenerational play via enactive interaction, competition and acceleration. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, (2010), 425--433. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Voida, A., and Greenberg, S. Console gaming across generations: Exploring intergenerational interactions in collocated console gaming. Univ. Access. Info. Society (2011). Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  22. Xie, B., A Druin, A., Fails, J., Massey, S., Golub, E., Franckel, S., and Schneider, K. Connecting generations: Developing co-design methods for older adults and children. Behav. Inform. Tech. (2010), 1--11. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library

Index Terms

  1. Co-creating games through intergenerational design workshops

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Login options

          Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

          Sign in
          • Published in

            cover image ACM Conferences
            DIS '12: Proceedings of the Designing Interactive Systems Conference
            June 2012
            828 pages
            ISBN:9781450312103
            DOI:10.1145/2317956

            Copyright © 2012 ACM

            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            • Published: 11 June 2012

            Permissions

            Request permissions about this article.

            Request Permissions

            Check for updates

            Qualifiers

            • research-article

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate1,158of4,684submissions,25%

            Upcoming Conference

            DIS '24
            Designing Interactive Systems Conference
            July 1 - 5, 2024
            IT University of Copenhagen , Denmark

          PDF Format

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader